An extra check for pending bytes in the SSL layer has been part of
pqReadReady() for a very long time (79ff2e96d). But when GSS transport
encryption was added, it didn't receive the same treatment. (As
79ff2e96d notes, "The bug that I fixed in this patch is exceptionally
hard to reproduce reliably.")
Without that check, it's possible to hit a hang in gssencmode, if the
server splits a large libpq message such that the final message in a
streamed response is part of the same wrapped token as the split
message:
DataRowDataRowDataRowDataRowDataRowData
-- token boundary --
RowDataRowCommandCompleteReadyForQuery
If the split message takes up enough memory to nearly fill libpq's
receive buffer, libpq may return from pqReadData() before the later
messages are pulled out of the PqGSSRecvBuffer. Without additional
socket activity from the server, pqReadReady() (via pqSocketCheck())
will never again return true, hanging the connection.
Pull the pending-bytes check into the pqsecure API layer, where both
SSL and GSS now implement it.
Note that this does not fix the root problem! Third party clients of
libpq have no way to call pqsecure_read_is_pending() in their own
polling. This just brings the GSS implementation up to par with the
existing SSL workaround; a broader fix is left to a subsequent commit.
In preparation for the broader fix, this patch already changes the
*_read_pending() functions to return the number of bytes in the buffer
rather than just a boolean. The current callers don't need that, but
the subsequent fix will.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi%2BmpymrgZ76Jre2dx_PwRniS9YZojwH0rZnTuiGHCsj0rA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Three error messages were using the default file name pg_hosts.conf
and not the variable backing the GUC, which would make logging be
confusing for users who have renamed the file using the GUC. Fix
by consistently using the HostsFileName variable.
Backpatch down to v19 where serverside SNI was introduced.
Author: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Surya Poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN4CZFMARYjQfgyRaCKOXDO=Q91kuKn=pSC02DAOOr23ojhEGQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
ParallelBackupStart() stored _beginthreadex()'s return value as the
worker's thread handle without checking it. On failure that value is 0,
which would later reach WaitForMultipleObjects() as a null handle, caught
only by an Assert. The fork() path already calls pg_fatal() when it
fails; do the same for _beginthreadex(), as pgbench does.
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8c712d76-ecf7-4749-a6d8-dddc01f298ec@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
9d9c02ccd added code to allow the executor to stop early when processing
WindowAgg nodes where a monotonic window function starts producing
values that result in a pushed-down qual no longer matching, and will
never match again due to the window function's monotonic properties.
That commit requires a SupportRequestWFuncMonotonic to exist on the
window function and for it to detect when the function is monotonic. For
COUNT(ANY) and COUNT(*), the support function failed to consider some
cases where the WindowClause used EXCLUDE to exclude certain rows from
being aggregated. Some WindowClause definitions mean we aggregate rows
that come after the current row, and when processing those rows later,
if we EXCLUDE certain rows, the monotonic property can be broken.
Wrongly treating the COUNT(*) or COUNT(ANY) aggregate as monotonic could
lead to rows being filtered that should not be filtered from the result
set.
Another issue was that the support function for the COUNT aggregate
mistakenly thought that a WindowClause without an ORDER BY meant that
the results would be both monotonically increasing and decreasing, but
that's only true when in RANGE mode, where all rows are peers.
It is possible to support various cases that do have an EXCLUDE clause,
but getting the logic correct for the exact set of cases that are valid
is quite complex and would likely better be left for a future project.
Here, we mostly disable run condition pushdown when there is an EXCLUDE
clause unless the clause is for EXCLUDE CURRENT ROW, uses COUNT(*)
(rather than COUNT(ANY)), and the window aggregate has no FILTER clause.
Bug: #19533
Reported-by: Qifan Liu <imchifan@163.com>
Author: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19533-413a1014e5d0e766@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 15
This was the dominant style already, but some places used %llu
instead. Since off_t/pgoff_t are signed types, using %lld seems a
better match, and it might handle obscure error conditions with
negative values better.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20ce62fa-47fc-457b-b504-12f3c1651726%40eisentraut.org
pgoff_t is most likely a 64-bit integer, so casting it to a 32-bit
type for output could lose data. In the cases addressed here, the
files cannot actually get that large, so this is only cosmetic and to
set better examples for the future. (Similar issues that could have
actual practical impact were addressed separately in commit
e8f851d6172.)
In one case, the 32-bit size is baked into the protocol, so here we
add an elog and document this discrepancy.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20ce62fa-47fc-457b-b504-12f3c1651726%40eisentraut.org
Commit 28972b6fc should have done this, but didn't.
While at it, remove an extra blank line in fetch_remote_statistics()
introduced by that commit.
Reported-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Co-authored-by: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6ED81190-B398-44C9-A1E9-8EFE4ED183AF%40gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
When GROUP BY ALL was added in commit ef38a4d975, the SQL standard
working draft was silent on what to do with window functions. This
has now been fixed in the SQL standard working draft. Update the
documentation and code comments about that.
Also make the documentation more specific that we are only talking
about aggregate functions referring to the same query level, which is
another thing that has been made more precise in the SQL standard
working draft since.
The PostgreSQL implementation was already doing the right thing for
both aspects, so no functionality changes.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHM0NXjz0kDwtzoe-fnHAqPB1qA8_VJN0XAmCgUZ%2BiPnvP5LbA%40mail.gmail.com
transformJsonBehavior() coerced an ON EMPTY / ON ERROR DEFAULT
expression only when its type differed from the RETURNING type's OID.
When the base type matched but the RETURNING type carried a type
modifier (e.g. numeric(4,1) or varchar(3)), the coercion that enforces
the typmod was skipped, so the DEFAULT value could violate the
declared type:
SELECT JSON_VALUE(jsonb '{}', '$.a'
RETURNING numeric(4,1) DEFAULT 99999.999 ON EMPTY);
returned 99999.999, which 99999.999::numeric(4,1) would reject; the
value could even be stored into a numeric(4,1) column, as later
coercions trust its already-correct type label.
Fix by also coercing when the RETURNING type has a typmod, except for
a NULL constant. coerce_to_target_type() is a no-op when the typmod
already matches. The matching-OID short-circuit dates to 74c96699be.
Reported-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Author: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAON2xHPO9f4cAmyGn1mQ=VqoS7wN5rz4yOiqudxX78zninZpCw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
We forgot to use the PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT in some newly added modules:
pg_plan_advice, pg_stash_advice and the pgrepack output plugin and
instead used the older PG_MODULE_MAGIC macro.
Author: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/ad7b910c-d145-4120-994d-2e55c456aa75@proxel.se
Backpatch-through: 19
The loop in MatchText() processed a leading '\' without regard to
nondeterministic locales, which is problematic if what the '\'
precedes is an ordinary character that should be subject to
nondeterministic matching. We'd insist on a literal match for it,
which is not right and is not like what happens with a '\' that
follows some ordinary characters. Worse, we'd then advance the text
and pattern pointers by one byte, so that if the escaped character
is multibyte the next loop iteration would take the nondeterministic
code path starting at a point within the character. That could very
possibly cause pg_strncoll() to misbehave.
The fix is quite simple: move the stanza that handles '\' down past
the one that handles nondeterminism. The stanzas for '%' and '_'
are fine where they are, but the '\' stanza is only correct for
deterministic matching. The logic for nondeterministic cases is
already prepared to do the right things with a '\'.
While here, I replaced tests of "locale && !locale->deterministic"
with a boolean local variable, reasoning that those are in the hot
loop paths so saving a branch and indirect fetch is worth the
trouble. I also improved a number of related comments.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/391592.1783187986@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 85b7efa1c added support for LIKE with nondeterministic
collations, but it included a bug in the de-escaping logic for
literal pattern substrings. That unconditionally skipped all
backslashes, but when it encounters '\\' it should emit the second
backslash as a de-escaped character. That led to acting as though
the escaped backslash was not there.
Bug: #19474
Reported-by: Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138@gmail.com>
Author: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19474-5b86a95f3d9a7ecb@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH5HC94yU+K8Gcdy12M5BS8gwD_SXLSHzc9k5tNk7JDnpBiFMA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 85b7efa1c introduced support for LIKE with non-deterministic
collations. By moving some conditionals around, it accidentally broke
the optimization for converting a LIKE or regex exact-match pattern
to an equality indexqual when the index collation doesn't match the
expression collation. That should be allowed if the expression
collation is deterministic. This patch re-introduces the optimization
for that common case.
One important beneficiary of this optimization is the "\d tablename"
command in psql. Without this fix that will do a seqscan on pg_class
instead of an index point lookup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DHBQIZX8SZVI.ZX614ZMFL645@jeltef.nl
Backpatch-through: 18
In commit ec8719ccbf, I added switch statements with all expected
shift counts to vector8_shift_{left,right} because vshlq_n_u32()
and vshrq_n_u32() require integer literals. But we can use
vshlq_u32() instead for both cases, which does not require an
integer literal, thereby avoiding the need for the switch
statements. This compiles to the same machine code on newer
versions of popular compilers.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/akWxkA-mszMm57cV%40nathan
Commit 2f094e7ac6 added a mention of SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH
to the SECURITY LABEL reference page, and it added support to psql tab
completion. However, security labels on property graphs are not
actually supported (per SecLabelSupportsObjectType()). The syntax
does work, but that is just a result of how gram.y is factored. We
don't document or tab-complete the syntax of SECURITY LABEL for other
object types that are not actually supported, so it was inconsistent
to do this for property graphs. Thus, remove this.
Reported-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20260704221210.08.noahmisch%40microsoft.com
With virtual generated columns there is no column to assign to, and we
shouldn't assign directly to stored generated columns either. (Once
we have PERIODs, we will allow a stored generated column here, but we
will assign to its start/end inputs.)
We can't do this in parse analysis, because views haven't yet been
rewritten, so they mask generated columns.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/agOOykf2HV26yVfU%40nathan
The planner has two optimizations that move a qual clause across a
grouping boundary: subquery_planner transfers HAVING clauses to WHERE
so they can be evaluated before aggregation, and qual_is_pushdown_safe
pushes outer restriction clauses into a subquery past its DISTINCT,
DISTINCT ON, window PARTITION BY, or set-operation grouping layer.
Both produce wrong results when the moved clause's equivalence
relation disagrees with the grouping's, since the clause then filters
rows the grouping would have merged.
The disagreement has two forms. A type may belong to multiple btree
opfamilies whose equality operators disagree (e.g. record_ops vs
record_image_ops); or the grouping may use a nondeterministic
collation, where comparing the column under a different collation, or
wrapping it in a function or operator, can distinguish values the
collation considers equal. Because we cannot prove an arbitrary
expression preserves that equality, a grouping column with a
nondeterministic collation is safe to push only as a direct operand of
a comparison under its own collation.
Fix both call sites through a shared walker parameterized by a
callback that maps each Var to the grouping equality operator for its
column (or InvalidOid for non-grouping Vars). For HAVING, the
callback recovers the SortGroupClause's eqop via the GROUP Var's
varattno, which requires running before flatten_group_exprs while
havingQual still contains GROUP Vars. For subquery pushdown, the
callback recovers the eqop from subquery->distinctClause, a window's
partitionClause, or any grouping node in the SetOperationStmt tree.
The walker fires only when there is an equivalence boundary to cross,
gated by either the existing UNSAFE_NOTIN_DISTINCTON_CLAUSE and
UNSAFE_NOTIN_PARTITIONBY_CLAUSE flags or by a recursive check for any
grouping node in the set-op tree.
Back-patch to v18 only. The HAVING half relies on the RTE_GROUP
mechanism introduced in v18 (commit 247dea89f), which is what lets us
identify grouping expressions via GROUP Vars on pre-flatten
havingQual. Pre-v18 branches lack that machinery, so a back-patch
there would need a different approach. Given the absence of field
reports of these bugs on back branches, the risk of carrying a
different fix on stable branches is not justified.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Irion <irionr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-QLZpn3UVOpeG2fOxxhdnkDNMZ_3Zcm3dqJwRAphz68g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
When io_min_workers is set strictly higher than io_max_workers, the
minimum has no effect since the pool will never grow past
io_max_workers. Previously this was silently accepted, which could
be confusing for users expecting at least io_min_workers workers to
always be running.
In order to avoid noise in the server logs, the following restrictions
are in place:
- The only process printing the WARNING is the IO worker with ID 0, on
startup and reload, which is we know the only process always running
when using IO workers.
- At reload, the message shows only if one of the bounds has changed.
Note that this commit reuses a log message updated by 7905416eef.
Author: Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@partin.io>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fm-RO_O7-XThg2qjj=ir35x9nOFbZYu07gttqAbM5T88QB4Q@mail.gmail.com
pgstat_register_kind() did not validate that required callbacks are
set, which could lead to NULL pointer dereferences when trying to
register a stats kind. This adds a couple of checks:
- Fox fixed-sized kinds, init_shmem_cb, reset_all_cb, and snapshot_cb
are required.
- For variable-sized kinds, flush_pending_cb is called when there is
pending data, pending_size being required.
These issues should be easy to notice for someone developing an
extension that relies on the custom pgstats APIs. No backpatch is done
as it is mainly a life improvement.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0uNoe=xT7QsU1K0mMRg-QAwPtupPWZ2J3weM2PjVL2tiA@mail.gmail.com
"prev_tuple" was overwritten with a new tuple coming from
CopyIndexTuple() on each loop, leaking memory for every tuple processed
on entry tree pages. The function uses a dedicated memory context, but
this could leave unused large areas of memory while processing a large
GIN index, the larger the worse.
Oversight in 14ffaece0f.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPjTS6TYe5=5NfMUBYZyQu5cn=ABL6K5_OZjzGWqnwXeBw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
psql decided whether to use the pager in expanded output without
accounting for possible wrapping of column values. This could
allow it to not use the pager in cases where it should do so.
To fix, move the IsPagerNeeded decision in print_aligned_vertical()
down until after the wrapped data width is known. Then, if we're in
wrapped mode, prepare a width_wrap array specifying that width (which,
in vertical mode, is the same for all columns).
This is fixing an omission in 27da1a796, so back-patch to v19
where that came in.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A44110E7-6A03-4C67-95AD-527192A6C768@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
There's no need to create and free a temporary copy of the input,
since str_tolower() is already able to cope with not-certainly-
nul-terminated input. (Before v18, copying was needed because
this code used lowerstr(), but now we can do without.)
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19525-b0be8e4eb7dbaf07@postgresql.org
AlterPropGraph() cleans up pg_propgraph_property entries that are
orphaned by dropping an element or by dropping properties associated
with an element. But it did not clean up pg_propgraph_property
entries that are orphaned by dropping labels associated with an
element. Fix this missing case.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Author: zengman <zengman@halodbtech.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/tencent_76F6ACA2364EAA1E5DBD7A47%40qq.com
ON SELECT rules must be named "_RETURN", while other kinds of rules
must not be; this ancient restriction is depended on by various client
code. We successfully enforced this convention in most places, but
ALTER RULE allowed renaming a non-SELECT rule to "_RETURN". Notably,
that would break dump/restore, since the eventual CREATE RULE command
would reject the name.
While at it, remove DefineQueryRewrite's hack to substitute "_RETURN"
for the convention that was used before 7.3. We dropped other
server-side code that supported restoring pre-7.3 dumps some time ago
(notably in e58a59975 and nearby commits), but this bit was missed.
Bug: #19543
Reported-by: Adam Pickering <adamkpickering@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19543-461228e77f3b32fc@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
getObjectDescription() currently constructs property graph-related
object descriptions incrementally with appendStringInfo(). This
effectively fixes the word order in English, which makes the messages
difficult to translate naturally into languages such as Japanese.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20260528.121622.1662808269492494574.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
gbt_var_node_cp_len() contained logic to ensure that its choice of
a common prefix length didn't truncate away part of a multibyte
character. However, that was really dead code, because we have not
allowed truncation of text-string data types since ef770cbb6, and
it seems unlikely that that behavior could ever get resurrected.
The code is still reachable via gbt_var_penalty, but for that
usage it hardly matters if we break in the middle of a multibyte
character: we're just calculating a small correction factor that
is arguably bunkum anyway in non-C locales.
Hence, delete said code. That actually removes all need for
gbtree_vinfo.eml, which allows const-ification of the gbtree_vinfo
structs in which we were changing it, which removes one headache
for future attempts to thread-ify the backend.
(Curiously, all this infrastructure was itself added by ef770cbb6.
Not sure why Teodor didn't see the contradiction.)
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Truncating an internal node's upper bound can cause it to compare
less than some values that in fact are included in the represented
leaf page. So we need a hack to make sure it looks large enough
to include all values that could be on the page. But there's no
equivalent issue for the lower bound. The fact that the code did
fuzzy comparisons for the lower bound too seems to be the result of
fuzzy thinking. Or maybe there was a desire to not assume too much
about what the datatype's comparison rule is; but we've already
fully bought into the premise that internal keys compare like bytea.
Hence, remove the useless check against the key's lower bound in
gbt_var_node_pf_match. The comparable check in gbt_var_penalty may
also be useless, but I'm not quite sure. In any case that seems
negligible from a performance standpoint, so I left it alone.
Also, in the strategy cases in gbt_var_consistent that only
require comparisons to the lower bound, there's no need to call
gbt_var_node_pf_match at all. Refactor that logic by inventing
macros lower_is_below_query and upper_is_above_query to directly
express what we need to test. I also took this opportunity to flip
all the tests around to be "indexkey OP query" rather than mostly
being the reverse: IMO this makes the code less confusing since the
tests now match the names of the strategies.
Also, in the name of consistency, make gbt_num_consistent look
like that too. There's no functional change there, but this
should be more readable going forward.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
For some odd reason we pass the strategy number to gbt_num_consistent
as "const StrategyNumber *strategy". There's no reason for that:
it almost certainly costs more at both callers and callee to pass a
pointer than to pass a small integer value. And it's inconsistent
with gbt_var_consistent(), so fix it.
gbt_var_consistent() had its own infelicity, which was not marking
the input "key" value const. Fix that too while we're here.
This is primarily cosmetic, so I see no need to backpatch.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
We were skipping a bunch of things that are mostly unnecessary for
REPACK. However, one thing that seems would be better to pass closer to
truth, is the updatedCols bitmapset in the range table entry for the
repacked table. Cons up an RTE and install it into the EState.
This only has an effect on btree indexes, because certain operations are
optimized in the case of unchanged columns; and even then, correctnesss
is not being compromised.
The values we pass after this commit are not fully trustworthy either,
because we simply say "all columns were updated" for all insert/updates,
regardless of whether their values were actually modified or not.
However, this way we err to the side of caution rather than to the
opposite direction as we were originally doing. This could be refined
in the future, but there's a trade-off: determining whether the column
was in fact updated could be expensive.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18222.1782126731@localhost
gbt_var_consistent() handled the <> (BtreeGistNotEqual) strategy without
distinguishing leaf from internal pages, unlike every other strategy.
In particular, it tried to apply the datatype-specific f_eq method,
which is completely wrong since internal keys might not have the same
representation as leaf keys. This led to OOB reads and potentially
crashes, and most likely to wrong query results as well.
On leaf pages we can apply the inverse of what the Equal strategy does.
On internal pages, use a correct implementation of what the previous
code intended: we can descend if the query value equals both bounds,
*so long as the bounds aren't truncated*. With truncated bounds we
don't quite know the range of what's below, so we must always descend.
Adjust the code in gbt_num_consistent() to look similar, too. This
fixes a performance buglet in that there's no need to do two comparisons
on a leaf entry, but the main point is just to keep code consistency.
Reported-by: 王跃林 <violin0613@tju.edu.cn>
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Backpatch-through: 14
There are a number of rather subtle points about the behavior of
this code, which its original authors did not deign to document.
Try to improve that. In particular, explain how internal and leaf
keys can differ and what the restrictions are on that.
This work arose from trying to fix some bugs, and in the process
I believe I've identified some more, but this patch does not attempt
to fix anything, only document it. I did make a few purely cosmetic
code changes, such as removing dead (and confusing!) initializations
of variables and choosing more appropriate types for some pointers.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
If we're dealing with leaf entries, the function to call is bitcmp
not byteacmp. Using byteacmp didn't lead to any obvious failure,
but it did result in sorting the entries in a way not matching the
datatype's actual sort order. Hence the constructed index would be
less efficient than one would expect, and in particular worse than
what you got before this code was added in v18 (by commit e4309f73f).
We might want to recommend that users reindex btree_gist indexes
on bit/varbit columns.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit ce146621 ensures that ERROR is raised if a session tries to read
pages of another session's temp table. But there is a corner case where
the other session's temp table is empty -- in this case the INSERT
command bypasses our checks and executes without any errors.
Such behavior is inconsistent and erroneous: it leaves an invalid buffer
in the temp buffers pool. Since the buffer was created for another
session's temp table, we get an error "no such file or directory" when
trying to flush it.
This commit fixes it by adding a RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP check in the
relation-extension path.
Backpatch to 16, because it is the first release after 31966b151e, which
introduced a separate local relation extension function
ExtendBufferedRelLocal(), which lacks of RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP() check.
As this fix introduces more checks to 013_temp_obj_multisession.pl, backpatch
the whole test script to 16.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJDiXgiX2XZBHDNo%2BzBbvku%2BtchrUurvPRaN1_40mEQ1_sG90g%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Reviewed-by: Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: ZizhuanLiu X-MAN <44973863@qq.com>
Backpatch-through: 16
When dropping a property by name from a label, the code checked only
whether the property existed in the graph's property catalog. It did
not verify that the property was actually associated with the given
label, resulting in passing InvalidOid to performDeletion(). Fix it
by explicilty checking the label property association.
While at it also rearrange the code so as to avoid multiple ereport
calls for the same error in the same block.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1DA5D52A-4AFA-426E-83F7-42ED974D682B%40gmail.com
BackendKeyData length was increased from 4 bytes to a variable-length
length (up to 256 bytes) in a460251f0a. However, pqTrace still traces
it as a 4 bytes key, leading to a "mismatched message length" warning
message. The same issue impacts the tracing of CancelRequest.
This patch fixes the issue by using pqTraceOutputNchar instead of
pqTraceOutputInt32 in both cases.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAO6_Xqo6gTv9=76H=k2qDRFU+KHuBiY2S=bQynEr6J8gS7L6xA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
In order to replay concurrent changes, REPACK CONCURRENTLY needs the
pg_attrdef tuples for the transient table to be there, in case a tuple
is modified concurrently with REPACK and requires to store the value
from the generated column (which, with the current arrangements, means
all tuples concurrently updated or inserted). Fix by creating a copy of
them from the original table. Add a test that tickles the bug.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reported-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAON2xHMrELwx9vKg6niSf8fMBA=-MGXmG=MPQU6+vMVhGjF8kQ@mail.gmail.com
Per SQL/PGQ standard, every graph element must have at least one
label. When dropping a label from a graph element, ensure that there
exists at least one other label on the element. If the label being
dropped is the only label on the element, raise an error.
We hold a ShareRowExclusiveLock when modifying a property graph.
Hence the label will not be dropped even when multiple labels are
being dropped concurrently.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Author: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHg+QDeP=mTHTV48R23zKMy1SBmCKZ_L7-z5zKnYyw+K0x-gCg@mail.gmail.com
Buildfarm member prion reported a failure in the test added by commit
c8bd8387c2 to verify that the server logs an empty statement body
when log_statement_max_length = 0.
The test assumed that "statement:" would appear immediately after
"LOG:" in the logged statement message. However, prion runs with
log_error_verbosity = verbose, which inserts the SQLSTATE between
"LOG:" and the message text. As a result, the test failed even though
the server behaved correctly.
Per buildfarm member prion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFiQKwvLVG+U0WWNo2kgkQ88FVGhYH_MBZu9Y0SJ8BjDw@mail.gmail.com
Commit fb421231da extended \df to include procedures, but its tab
completion continued not to show procedures.
Update \df tab completion to include procedures as well.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Surya Poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10fbfdfe-80f6-4ef9-b8b3-f7be0eb53a50@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: 14
GetBufferDescriptor() and GetLocalBufferDescriptor() took a uint32
buffer index, but every real caller derives the index from a Buffer:
- Unsigned value for shared buffers.
- Signed value for local buffers.
Both routines now take in input a signed number, GetBufferDescriptor()
gaining an assertion checking that the input value is in the range
allowed by the GUC shared_buffers. This work is a follow-up of
e18b0cb734, where we found that passing down a value for a local
buffer was undetected and finished outside the range of NBuffers.
While monitoring all the existing callers of *BufferDescriptor(), the
only consumer that passes does an unsigned value is ClockSweepTick(),
whose result is always a module of NBuffers.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5uzRMYVZsXXS3HXXT0fG_sNrpUhUqwP4NorhaCqH9JDhA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, MultiXactId wraparound hints suggested dropping stale
replication slots. While that advice is appropriate for transaction ID
wraparound, where replication slots can hold back XID horizons,
it was misleading for MultiXactId wraparound. Following it could lead
users to drop replication slots unnecessarily without helping resolve
the MultiXactId wraparound condition.
MultiXact cleanup is not directly delayed by replication slots.
Instead, it depends on whether old MultiXactIds can still be seen
as live by running transactions.
This commit removes the replication slot advice from MultiXactId
wraparound hints, and documents that stale replication slots are
normally not relevant to resolving MultiXactId wraparound problems.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
BUG #18876
Reported-by: Haruka Takatsuka <harukat@sraoss.co.jp>
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18876-0d0b53bad5a1f4c1@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
Very large statements can make server logs grow unexpectedly. This is
particularly painful when applications accidentally or intentionally
send huge literal values and statement logging is enabled: the full
statement text may be written to the log even when DBA sees only
its leading part is useful for normal operations.
This commit adds log_statement_max_length GUC that limits the number
of bytes of statement text emitted by statement logging. The setting
applies to statements logged by log_statement, log_min_duration_statement,
log_min_duration_sample, and log_transaction_sample_rate. A positive
value truncates the logged statement body to at most that many bytes,
zero logs an empty statement body, and the default value -1 preserves
the existing behavior of logging statements in full.
Truncation is byte-based, matching the GUC unit, but it clips only
at multibyte character boundaries so that the log output remains valid.
This setting does not affect statements logged because of
log_min_error_statement; handling error-statement logging can be
considered separately.
Author: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Author: Kirill Gavrilov <diphantxm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Maxym Kharchenko <maxymkharchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+E0NR4S+NC6+QHyY_vUuQZMzLhKqczMx-jJVqtjAxF6+=JwAA@mail.gmail.com
