The loop in MatchText() processed a leading '\' without regard to
nondeterministic locales, which is problematic if what the '\'
precedes is an ordinary character that should be subject to
nondeterministic matching. We'd insist on a literal match for it,
which is not right and is not like what happens with a '\' that
follows some ordinary characters. Worse, we'd then advance the text
and pattern pointers by one byte, so that if the escaped character
is multibyte the next loop iteration would take the nondeterministic
code path starting at a point within the character. That could very
possibly cause pg_strncoll() to misbehave.
The fix is quite simple: move the stanza that handles '\' down past
the one that handles nondeterminism. The stanzas for '%' and '_'
are fine where they are, but the '\' stanza is only correct for
deterministic matching. The logic for nondeterministic cases is
already prepared to do the right things with a '\'.
While here, I replaced tests of "locale && !locale->deterministic"
with a boolean local variable, reasoning that those are in the hot
loop paths so saving a branch and indirect fetch is worth the
trouble. I also improved a number of related comments.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/391592.1783187986@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 85b7efa1c added support for LIKE with nondeterministic
collations, but it included a bug in the de-escaping logic for
literal pattern substrings. That unconditionally skipped all
backslashes, but when it encounters '\\' it should emit the second
backslash as a de-escaped character. That led to acting as though
the escaped backslash was not there.
Bug: #19474
Reported-by: Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138@gmail.com>
Author: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19474-5b86a95f3d9a7ecb@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH5HC94yU+K8Gcdy12M5BS8gwD_SXLSHzc9k5tNk7JDnpBiFMA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit 85b7efa1c introduced support for LIKE with non-deterministic
collations. By moving some conditionals around, it accidentally broke
the optimization for converting a LIKE or regex exact-match pattern
to an equality indexqual when the index collation doesn't match the
expression collation. That should be allowed if the expression
collation is deterministic. This patch re-introduces the optimization
for that common case.
One important beneficiary of this optimization is the "\d tablename"
command in psql. Without this fix that will do a seqscan on pg_class
instead of an index point lookup.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DHBQIZX8SZVI.ZX614ZMFL645@jeltef.nl
Backpatch-through: 18
In commit ec8719ccbf, I added switch statements with all expected
shift counts to vector8_shift_{left,right} because vshlq_n_u32()
and vshrq_n_u32() require integer literals. But we can use
vshlq_u32() instead for both cases, which does not require an
integer literal, thereby avoiding the need for the switch
statements. This compiles to the same machine code on newer
versions of popular compilers.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/akWxkA-mszMm57cV%40nathan
Commit 2f094e7ac6 added a mention of SECURITY LABEL ON PROPERTY GRAPH
to the SECURITY LABEL reference page, and it added support to psql tab
completion. However, security labels on property graphs are not
actually supported (per SecLabelSupportsObjectType()). The syntax
does work, but that is just a result of how gram.y is factored. We
don't document or tab-complete the syntax of SECURITY LABEL for other
object types that are not actually supported, so it was inconsistent
to do this for property graphs. Thus, remove this.
Reported-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20260704221210.08.noahmisch%40microsoft.com
With virtual generated columns there is no column to assign to, and we
shouldn't assign directly to stored generated columns either. (Once
we have PERIODs, we will allow a stored generated column here, but we
will assign to its start/end inputs.)
We can't do this in parse analysis, because views haven't yet been
rewritten, so they mask generated columns.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/agOOykf2HV26yVfU%40nathan
The planner has two optimizations that move a qual clause across a
grouping boundary: subquery_planner transfers HAVING clauses to WHERE
so they can be evaluated before aggregation, and qual_is_pushdown_safe
pushes outer restriction clauses into a subquery past its DISTINCT,
DISTINCT ON, window PARTITION BY, or set-operation grouping layer.
Both produce wrong results when the moved clause's equivalence
relation disagrees with the grouping's, since the clause then filters
rows the grouping would have merged.
The disagreement has two forms. A type may belong to multiple btree
opfamilies whose equality operators disagree (e.g. record_ops vs
record_image_ops); or the grouping may use a nondeterministic
collation, where comparing the column under a different collation, or
wrapping it in a function or operator, can distinguish values the
collation considers equal. Because we cannot prove an arbitrary
expression preserves that equality, a grouping column with a
nondeterministic collation is safe to push only as a direct operand of
a comparison under its own collation.
Fix both call sites through a shared walker parameterized by a
callback that maps each Var to the grouping equality operator for its
column (or InvalidOid for non-grouping Vars). For HAVING, the
callback recovers the SortGroupClause's eqop via the GROUP Var's
varattno, which requires running before flatten_group_exprs while
havingQual still contains GROUP Vars. For subquery pushdown, the
callback recovers the eqop from subquery->distinctClause, a window's
partitionClause, or any grouping node in the SetOperationStmt tree.
The walker fires only when there is an equivalence boundary to cross,
gated by either the existing UNSAFE_NOTIN_DISTINCTON_CLAUSE and
UNSAFE_NOTIN_PARTITIONBY_CLAUSE flags or by a recursive check for any
grouping node in the set-op tree.
Back-patch to v18 only. The HAVING half relies on the RTE_GROUP
mechanism introduced in v18 (commit 247dea89f), which is what lets us
identify grouping expressions via GROUP Vars on pre-flatten
havingQual. Pre-v18 branches lack that machinery, so a back-patch
there would need a different approach. Given the absence of field
reports of these bugs on back branches, the risk of carrying a
different fix on stable branches is not justified.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Florin Irion <irionr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chengpeng Yan <chengpeng_yan@outlook.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-QLZpn3UVOpeG2fOxxhdnkDNMZ_3Zcm3dqJwRAphz68g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
When io_min_workers is set strictly higher than io_max_workers, the
minimum has no effect since the pool will never grow past
io_max_workers. Previously this was silently accepted, which could
be confusing for users expecting at least io_min_workers workers to
always be running.
In order to avoid noise in the server logs, the following restrictions
are in place:
- The only process printing the WARNING is the IO worker with ID 0, on
startup and reload, which is we know the only process always running
when using IO workers.
- At reload, the message shows only if one of the bounds has changed.
Note that this commit reuses a log message updated by 7905416eef.
Author: Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@partin.io>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fm-RO_O7-XThg2qjj=ir35x9nOFbZYu07gttqAbM5T88QB4Q@mail.gmail.com
pgstat_register_kind() did not validate that required callbacks are
set, which could lead to NULL pointer dereferences when trying to
register a stats kind. This adds a couple of checks:
- Fox fixed-sized kinds, init_shmem_cb, reset_all_cb, and snapshot_cb
are required.
- For variable-sized kinds, flush_pending_cb is called when there is
pending data, pending_size being required.
These issues should be easy to notice for someone developing an
extension that relies on the custom pgstats APIs. No backpatch is done
as it is mainly a life improvement.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0uNoe=xT7QsU1K0mMRg-QAwPtupPWZ2J3weM2PjVL2tiA@mail.gmail.com
"prev_tuple" was overwritten with a new tuple coming from
CopyIndexTuple() on each loop, leaking memory for every tuple processed
on entry tree pages. The function uses a dedicated memory context, but
this could leave unused large areas of memory while processing a large
GIN index, the larger the worse.
Oversight in 14ffaece0f.
Author: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPjTS6TYe5=5NfMUBYZyQu5cn=ABL6K5_OZjzGWqnwXeBw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
psql decided whether to use the pager in expanded output without
accounting for possible wrapping of column values. This could
allow it to not use the pager in cases where it should do so.
To fix, move the IsPagerNeeded decision in print_aligned_vertical()
down until after the wrapped data width is known. Then, if we're in
wrapped mode, prepare a width_wrap array specifying that width (which,
in vertical mode, is the same for all columns).
This is fixing an omission in 27da1a796, so back-patch to v19
where that came in.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A44110E7-6A03-4C67-95AD-527192A6C768@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 19
There's no need to create and free a temporary copy of the input,
since str_tolower() is already able to cope with not-certainly-
nul-terminated input. (Before v18, copying was needed because
this code used lowerstr(), but now we can do without.)
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19525-b0be8e4eb7dbaf07@postgresql.org
AlterPropGraph() cleans up pg_propgraph_property entries that are
orphaned by dropping an element or by dropping properties associated
with an element. But it did not clean up pg_propgraph_property
entries that are orphaned by dropping labels associated with an
element. Fix this missing case.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Author: zengman <zengman@halodbtech.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/tencent_76F6ACA2364EAA1E5DBD7A47%40qq.com
ON SELECT rules must be named "_RETURN", while other kinds of rules
must not be; this ancient restriction is depended on by various client
code. We successfully enforced this convention in most places, but
ALTER RULE allowed renaming a non-SELECT rule to "_RETURN". Notably,
that would break dump/restore, since the eventual CREATE RULE command
would reject the name.
While at it, remove DefineQueryRewrite's hack to substitute "_RETURN"
for the convention that was used before 7.3. We dropped other
server-side code that supported restoring pre-7.3 dumps some time ago
(notably in e58a59975 and nearby commits), but this bit was missed.
Bug: #19543
Reported-by: Adam Pickering <adamkpickering@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19543-461228e77f3b32fc@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
getObjectDescription() currently constructs property graph-related
object descriptions incrementally with appendStringInfo(). This
effectively fixes the word order in English, which makes the messages
difficult to translate naturally into languages such as Japanese.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20260528.121622.1662808269492494574.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
gbt_var_node_cp_len() contained logic to ensure that its choice of
a common prefix length didn't truncate away part of a multibyte
character. However, that was really dead code, because we have not
allowed truncation of text-string data types since ef770cbb6, and
it seems unlikely that that behavior could ever get resurrected.
The code is still reachable via gbt_var_penalty, but for that
usage it hardly matters if we break in the middle of a multibyte
character: we're just calculating a small correction factor that
is arguably bunkum anyway in non-C locales.
Hence, delete said code. That actually removes all need for
gbtree_vinfo.eml, which allows const-ification of the gbtree_vinfo
structs in which we were changing it, which removes one headache
for future attempts to thread-ify the backend.
(Curiously, all this infrastructure was itself added by ef770cbb6.
Not sure why Teodor didn't see the contradiction.)
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Truncating an internal node's upper bound can cause it to compare
less than some values that in fact are included in the represented
leaf page. So we need a hack to make sure it looks large enough
to include all values that could be on the page. But there's no
equivalent issue for the lower bound. The fact that the code did
fuzzy comparisons for the lower bound too seems to be the result of
fuzzy thinking. Or maybe there was a desire to not assume too much
about what the datatype's comparison rule is; but we've already
fully bought into the premise that internal keys compare like bytea.
Hence, remove the useless check against the key's lower bound in
gbt_var_node_pf_match. The comparable check in gbt_var_penalty may
also be useless, but I'm not quite sure. In any case that seems
negligible from a performance standpoint, so I left it alone.
Also, in the strategy cases in gbt_var_consistent that only
require comparisons to the lower bound, there's no need to call
gbt_var_node_pf_match at all. Refactor that logic by inventing
macros lower_is_below_query and upper_is_above_query to directly
express what we need to test. I also took this opportunity to flip
all the tests around to be "indexkey OP query" rather than mostly
being the reverse: IMO this makes the code less confusing since the
tests now match the names of the strategies.
Also, in the name of consistency, make gbt_num_consistent look
like that too. There's no functional change there, but this
should be more readable going forward.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
For some odd reason we pass the strategy number to gbt_num_consistent
as "const StrategyNumber *strategy". There's no reason for that:
it almost certainly costs more at both callers and callee to pass a
pointer than to pass a small integer value. And it's inconsistent
with gbt_var_consistent(), so fix it.
gbt_var_consistent() had its own infelicity, which was not marking
the input "key" value const. Fix that too while we're here.
This is primarily cosmetic, so I see no need to backpatch.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
We were skipping a bunch of things that are mostly unnecessary for
REPACK. However, one thing that seems would be better to pass closer to
truth, is the updatedCols bitmapset in the range table entry for the
repacked table. Cons up an RTE and install it into the EState.
This only has an effect on btree indexes, because certain operations are
optimized in the case of unchanged columns; and even then, correctnesss
is not being compromised.
The values we pass after this commit are not fully trustworthy either,
because we simply say "all columns were updated" for all insert/updates,
regardless of whether their values were actually modified or not.
However, this way we err to the side of caution rather than to the
opposite direction as we were originally doing. This could be refined
in the future, but there's a trade-off: determining whether the column
was in fact updated could be expensive.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18222.1782126731@localhost
gbt_var_consistent() handled the <> (BtreeGistNotEqual) strategy without
distinguishing leaf from internal pages, unlike every other strategy.
In particular, it tried to apply the datatype-specific f_eq method,
which is completely wrong since internal keys might not have the same
representation as leaf keys. This led to OOB reads and potentially
crashes, and most likely to wrong query results as well.
On leaf pages we can apply the inverse of what the Equal strategy does.
On internal pages, use a correct implementation of what the previous
code intended: we can descend if the query value equals both bounds,
*so long as the bounds aren't truncated*. With truncated bounds we
don't quite know the range of what's below, so we must always descend.
Adjust the code in gbt_num_consistent() to look similar, too. This
fixes a performance buglet in that there's no need to do two comparisons
on a leaf entry, but the main point is just to keep code consistency.
Reported-by: 王跃林 <violin0613@tju.edu.cn>
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Backpatch-through: 14
There are a number of rather subtle points about the behavior of
this code, which its original authors did not deign to document.
Try to improve that. In particular, explain how internal and leaf
keys can differ and what the restrictions are on that.
This work arose from trying to fix some bugs, and in the process
I believe I've identified some more, but this patch does not attempt
to fix anything, only document it. I did make a few purely cosmetic
code changes, such as removing dead (and confusing!) initializations
of variables and choosing more appropriate types for some pointers.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
If we're dealing with leaf entries, the function to call is bitcmp
not byteacmp. Using byteacmp didn't lead to any obvious failure,
but it did result in sorting the entries in a way not matching the
datatype's actual sort order. Hence the constructed index would be
less efficient than one would expect, and in particular worse than
what you got before this code was added in v18 (by commit e4309f73f).
We might want to recommend that users reindex btree_gist indexes
on bit/varbit columns.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AH*AvQCYKhQGVvPWi1GiU4oY.8.1781609375063.Hmail.3020001251@tju.edu.cn
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit ce146621 ensures that ERROR is raised if a session tries to read
pages of another session's temp table. But there is a corner case where
the other session's temp table is empty -- in this case the INSERT
command bypasses our checks and executes without any errors.
Such behavior is inconsistent and erroneous: it leaves an invalid buffer
in the temp buffers pool. Since the buffer was created for another
session's temp table, we get an error "no such file or directory" when
trying to flush it.
This commit fixes it by adding a RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP check in the
relation-extension path.
Backpatch to 16, because it is the first release after 31966b151e, which
introduced a separate local relation extension function
ExtendBufferedRelLocal(), which lacks of RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP() check.
As this fix introduces more checks to 013_temp_obj_multisession.pl, backpatch
the whole test script to 16.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJDiXgiX2XZBHDNo%2BzBbvku%2BtchrUurvPRaN1_40mEQ1_sG90g%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Reviewed-by: Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: ZizhuanLiu X-MAN <44973863@qq.com>
Backpatch-through: 16
When dropping a property by name from a label, the code checked only
whether the property existed in the graph's property catalog. It did
not verify that the property was actually associated with the given
label, resulting in passing InvalidOid to performDeletion(). Fix it
by explicilty checking the label property association.
While at it also rearrange the code so as to avoid multiple ereport
calls for the same error in the same block.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1DA5D52A-4AFA-426E-83F7-42ED974D682B%40gmail.com
BackendKeyData length was increased from 4 bytes to a variable-length
length (up to 256 bytes) in a460251f0a. However, pqTrace still traces
it as a 4 bytes key, leading to a "mismatched message length" warning
message. The same issue impacts the tracing of CancelRequest.
This patch fixes the issue by using pqTraceOutputNchar instead of
pqTraceOutputInt32 in both cases.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAO6_Xqo6gTv9=76H=k2qDRFU+KHuBiY2S=bQynEr6J8gS7L6xA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
In order to replay concurrent changes, REPACK CONCURRENTLY needs the
pg_attrdef tuples for the transient table to be there, in case a tuple
is modified concurrently with REPACK and requires to store the value
from the generated column (which, with the current arrangements, means
all tuples concurrently updated or inserted). Fix by creating a copy of
them from the original table. Add a test that tickles the bug.
Author: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reported-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAON2xHMrELwx9vKg6niSf8fMBA=-MGXmG=MPQU6+vMVhGjF8kQ@mail.gmail.com
Per SQL/PGQ standard, every graph element must have at least one
label. When dropping a label from a graph element, ensure that there
exists at least one other label on the element. If the label being
dropped is the only label on the element, raise an error.
We hold a ShareRowExclusiveLock when modifying a property graph.
Hence the label will not be dropped even when multiple labels are
being dropped concurrently.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Author: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Satyanarayana Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHg+QDeP=mTHTV48R23zKMy1SBmCKZ_L7-z5zKnYyw+K0x-gCg@mail.gmail.com
Buildfarm member prion reported a failure in the test added by commit
c8bd8387c2 to verify that the server logs an empty statement body
when log_statement_max_length = 0.
The test assumed that "statement:" would appear immediately after
"LOG:" in the logged statement message. However, prion runs with
log_error_verbosity = verbose, which inserts the SQLSTATE between
"LOG:" and the message text. As a result, the test failed even though
the server behaved correctly.
Per buildfarm member prion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFiQKwvLVG+U0WWNo2kgkQ88FVGhYH_MBZu9Y0SJ8BjDw@mail.gmail.com
Commit fb421231da extended \df to include procedures, but its tab
completion continued not to show procedures.
Update \df tab completion to include procedures as well.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Surya Poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10fbfdfe-80f6-4ef9-b8b3-f7be0eb53a50@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: 14
GetBufferDescriptor() and GetLocalBufferDescriptor() took a uint32
buffer index, but every real caller derives the index from a Buffer:
- Unsigned value for shared buffers.
- Signed value for local buffers.
Both routines now take in input a signed number, GetBufferDescriptor()
gaining an assertion checking that the input value is in the range
allowed by the GUC shared_buffers. This work is a follow-up of
e18b0cb734, where we found that passing down a value for a local
buffer was undetected and finished outside the range of NBuffers.
While monitoring all the existing callers of *BufferDescriptor(), the
only consumer that passes does an unsigned value is ClockSweepTick(),
whose result is always a module of NBuffers.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5uzRMYVZsXXS3HXXT0fG_sNrpUhUqwP4NorhaCqH9JDhA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, MultiXactId wraparound hints suggested dropping stale
replication slots. While that advice is appropriate for transaction ID
wraparound, where replication slots can hold back XID horizons,
it was misleading for MultiXactId wraparound. Following it could lead
users to drop replication slots unnecessarily without helping resolve
the MultiXactId wraparound condition.
MultiXact cleanup is not directly delayed by replication slots.
Instead, it depends on whether old MultiXactIds can still be seen
as live by running transactions.
This commit removes the replication slot advice from MultiXactId
wraparound hints, and documents that stale replication slots are
normally not relevant to resolving MultiXactId wraparound problems.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
BUG #18876
Reported-by: Haruka Takatsuka <harukat@sraoss.co.jp>
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18876-0d0b53bad5a1f4c1@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
Very large statements can make server logs grow unexpectedly. This is
particularly painful when applications accidentally or intentionally
send huge literal values and statement logging is enabled: the full
statement text may be written to the log even when DBA sees only
its leading part is useful for normal operations.
This commit adds log_statement_max_length GUC that limits the number
of bytes of statement text emitted by statement logging. The setting
applies to statements logged by log_statement, log_min_duration_statement,
log_min_duration_sample, and log_transaction_sample_rate. A positive
value truncates the logged statement body to at most that many bytes,
zero logs an empty statement body, and the default value -1 preserves
the existing behavior of logging statements in full.
Truncation is byte-based, matching the GUC unit, but it clips only
at multibyte character boundaries so that the log output remains valid.
This setting does not affect statements logged because of
log_min_error_statement; handling error-statement logging can be
considered separately.
Author: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Author: Kirill Gavrilov <diphantxm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Maxym Kharchenko <maxymkharchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+E0NR4S+NC6+QHyY_vUuQZMzLhKqczMx-jJVqtjAxF6+=JwAA@mail.gmail.com
A foreign scan can target a single relation while still reaching the
fs_relids branch of pgpa_build_scan() -- for example, when postgres_fdw
pushes an aggregate down over one foreign table. In that case, no
advice should be emitted.
Author: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAKYtNAofuAJBz6++SeikpCb=Y=MO1QgEuZNJ+KZOP2johF1r4Q@mail.gmail.com
For ease of review, and to be able to put the indentation changes
in .git-blame-ignore-revs, I did not fix the indentation of the
last 3 commits. Do that now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/adZ4j88Dq9r8y9_9%40nathan
Per discussion, it seems like a good time to bump the minimum
supported version for various applications. Our current policy is
to support at least 10 previous major versions, so this bumps the
minimum to v10 for the v20 release. For reference, the minimum was
last bumped to v9.2 in 2021 for v15 (see commits 30e7c175b8,
e469f0aaf3, cf0cab868a, and 492046fa9e).
For ease of review, and to be able to put the indentation changes
in .git-blame-ignore-revs, I did not fix the indentation in this
patch. I'll push a separate pgindent commit after these changes
are applied.
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/adZ4j88Dq9r8y9_9%40nathan
Per discussion, it seems like a good time to bump the minimum
supported version for various applications. Our current policy is
to support at least 10 previous major versions, so this bumps the
minimum to v10 for the v20 release. For reference, the minimum was
last bumped to v9.2 in 2021 for v15 (see commits 30e7c175b8,
e469f0aaf3, cf0cab868a, and 492046fa9e).
For ease of review, and to be able to put the indentation changes
in .git-blame-ignore-revs, I did not fix the indentation in this
patch. I'll push a separate pgindent commit after these changes
are applied.
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/adZ4j88Dq9r8y9_9%40nathan
Per discussion, it seems like a good time to bump the minimum
supported version for various applications. Our current policy is
to support at least 10 previous major versions, so this bumps the
minimum to v10 for the v20 release. For reference, the minimum was
last bumped to v9.2 in 2021 for v15 (see commits 30e7c175b8,
e469f0aaf3, cf0cab868a, and 492046fa9e). As in previous changes of
this sort, we aren't removing pg_restore's ability to read older
archive files, though it's fair to wonder how that might be tested
nowadays.
For ease of review, and to be able to put the indentation changes
in .git-blame-ignore-revs, I did not fix the indentation in this
patch. I'll push a separate pgindent commit after these changes
are applied.
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/adZ4j88Dq9r8y9_9%40nathan
The int2, oid, and oid8 "fastcmp" comparators are functionally
equivalent to the ssup_datum_int32_cmp (for int2) and
ssup_datum_unsigned_cmp (for oid, oid8) functions added by commit
697492434, so simplify by using the latter instead. This has the
added benefit of making these types eligible for radix sort.
Author: Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fm-RMyLC94NfrxCh273+dKs44U0ZJjRczznvzvgw=KtpPNVw@mail.gmail.com
Previously, test_custom_var_stats and test_custom_fixed_stats silently
skipped pgstat_register_kind() when not loaded via
shared_preload_libraries, behavior inherited from injection_points.
This left the SQL functions callable without the kind registered,
leading to various issues on the backend side.
This code is not designed to work without the pgstats kinds registered.
pgstat_register_kind() gets now called when these libraries are loaded,
with or without shared_preload_libraries, letting the registration fail
if loading the modules at a later step than startup. test_custom_rmgrs
does the same thing.
Oversight in 31280d96a6.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/akS/ldidWeqG1FWk@bdtpg
Backpatch-through: 19
Multiplying by the constant 0.001 can produce trailing-digit noise in
displayed values (for example 0.009000000000000001 instead of 0.009,
with default extra_float_digits) because 0.001 cannot be represented
exactly in binary floating point. Use division by 1000.0 instead,
matching code elsewhere in the tree.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/akIYkMK4bHe9qX/N@bdtpg
The existing comment explained that a user-created slot could reuse the
same shared memory as 'local_slot' during the window between selecting a
slot to drop and locking its database, and that we therefore recheck
before dropping. It did not, however, spell out the fuller consequence:
because local_slot points to a reusable slot-array entry, its fields may
already describe a replacement slot, so the earlier drop decision and the
slot_database used for locking could relate to an unrelated slot/database.
Expand the comment to describe this, and note that the recheck prevents
us from dropping a user-created replacement slot while the residual risk
(such as briefly locking an unrelated database) is confined to the cycle
and is acceptable given the race is rare and non-fatal.
No functional change.
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGGyEDL3dh7uJ6qPsGvnq4QK_R8+U=12CaprnzwrwaLGA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwHqQ1PPVFfYKVxLfRyC-byRdwSN0NeaHj9SLYV97oO5cw@mail.gmail.com
