In the wake of commit b073c3ccd, it's necessary to grant create
permissions on the public schema to PUBLIC to get many of the
core regression test scripts to pass. That commit did so via the
quick-n-dirty expedient of adding the GRANT to the tablespace test,
which runs first. This is problematic for single-machine
replication testing, though. The least painful way to run the
regression tests on such a setup is to skip the tablespace test,
and that no longer works.
To fix, let's invent a separate "test_setup" script to run first,
and put the GRANT there. Revert b073c3ccd's changes to
the tablespace.source files.
In the future it might be good to try to reduce coupling between
the various test scripts by having test_setup create widely-used
objects, with the goal that most of the scripts could run after
having run only test_setup. That's going to take some effort,
so this commit just addresses my immediate pain point.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1363170.1639763559@sss.pgh.pa.us
Fix the code changed by commit 5c056b0c2 so that we always generate
RelabelType, not something else, for a cast to unspecified typmod.
Otherwise planner optimizations might not happen.
It appears we missed this point because the previous experiments were
done on type numeric: the parser undesirably generates a call on the
numeric() length-coercion function, but then numeric_support()
optimizes that down to a RelabelType, so that everything seems fine.
It misbehaves for types that have a non-optimized length coercion
function, such as bpchar.
Per report from John Naylor. Back-patch to all supported branches,
as the previous patch eventually was. Unfortunately, that no longer
includes 9.6 ... we really shouldn't put this type of change into a
nearly-EOL branch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsEfbFHEkouc+FSj+3K1sHipLPbEC67L0SAe-9-da8QtYg@mail.gmail.com
Nobody has filled in these stubs for upwards of twenty years,
so it's time to drop the idea that they might get implemented
any day now. The associated pg_operator and pg_proc entries
are just confusing wastes of space.
Per complaint from Anton Voloshin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3426566.1638832718@sss.pgh.pa.us
The multirange_get_range() function fails when two boundaries of the same
range have different alignments. Fix that by adding proper pointer alignment.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17300-dced2d01ddeb1f2f%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
The test added by 5753d4ee32 relies on statistics collector, and so it
may occasionally fail when the UDP packet gets lost. Some machines may
be susceptible to this, probably depending on load etc.
Move the test to stats.sql, which is known to already have this issue
and people know to ignore it.
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFp7QwpMRGcDAQumN7onN9HjrJ3u4X3ZRXdGFT0K5G2JWvnbWg%40mail.gmail.com
We publish the child table's data twice for a publication that has both
child and parent tables and is published with publish_via_partition_root
as true. This happens because subscribers will initiate synchronization
using both parent and child tables, since it gets both as separate tables
in the initial table list.
Ensure that pg_publication_tables returns only parent tables in such
cases.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Greg Nancarrow, Amit Langote, Vignesh C, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57167F45D481F78CDC5986F794B99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Extend the foreign key ON DELETE actions SET NULL and SET DEFAULT by
allowing the specification of a column list, like
CREATE TABLE posts (
...
FOREIGN KEY (tenant_id, author_id) REFERENCES users ON DELETE SET NULL (author_id)
);
If a column list is specified, only those columns are set to
null/default, instead of all the columns in the foreign-key
constraint.
This is useful for multitenant or sharded schemas, where the tenant or
shard ID is included in the primary key of all tables but shouldn't be
set to null.
Author: Paul Martinez <paulmtz@google.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACqFVBZQyMYJV=njbSMxf+rbDHpx=W=B7AEaMKn8dWn9OZJY7w@mail.gmail.com
We show duplicate values for child tables in publications that have both
child and parent tables and are published with publish_via_partition_root
as false which is not what the user would expect.
We decided not to backpatch this as there is no user complaint about this
and it doesn't seem to be a critical issue.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Amit Langote, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716E97F00732B52DC2BBC2594989@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
This simplifies the code so as it is not necessary anymore for the
caller of parse_subscription_options() to zero SubOpts, holding a
bitmaps of the provided options as well as the default/parsed option
values. This also simplifies some checks related to the options
supported by a command when checking for incompatibilities.
While on it, the errors generated for unsupported combinations with
"slot_name = NONE" are reordered. This may generate a different errors
compared to the previous major versions, but users have to go through
all those errors to get a correct command in this case when using
incorrect values for options "enabled" and "create\slot", so at the end
the resulting command would remain the same.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtXHfLgLHDDJ8ZN5f5Be_37mJoxpEsRg8LNmm4XCr06Rw@mail.gmail.com
An extension can already de facto reserve a GUC prefix using
EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders(). But this was only checked against
settings that exist at the time the extension is loaded (or the
extension chooses to call this). No diagnostic is given when a SET
command later uses a nonexisting setting with a custom prefix.
With this change, EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders() saves the prefixes it
reserves in a list, and SET checks when it finds a "placeholder"
setting whether it belongs to a reserved prefix and issues a warning
in that case.
Add a regression test that checks the patch using the "plpgsql"
registered prefix.
Author: Florin Irion <florin.irion@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+HEvJDhWuuTpGTJT9Tgbdzm4QS4EzPAwDBScWK18H2Q=FVJFw@mail.gmail.com
When determining whether an index update may be skipped by using HOT, we
can ignore attributes indexed only by BRIN indexes. There are no index
pointers to individual tuples in BRIN, and the page range summary will
be updated anyway as it relies on visibility info.
This also removes rd_indexattr list, and replaces it with rd_attrsvalid
flag. The list was not used anywhere, and a simple flag is sufficient.
Patch by Josef Simanek, various fixes and improvements by me.
Author: Josef Simanek
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFp7QwpMRGcDAQumN7onN9HjrJ3u4X3ZRXdGFT0K5G2JWvnbWg%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 6aaaa76bb added support for the GRANTED BY clause in GRANT and
REVOKE statements, but missed adding support for checking the role in
the REVOKE ROLE case. Fix by checking that the parsed role matches the
CURRENT_ROLE/CURRENT_USER requirement, and also add some tests for it.
Backpatch to v14 where GRANTED BY support was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B7F6699A-A984-4943-B9BF-CEB84C003527@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 14
Replica identities that depend directly on an index rely on a set of
properties, one of them being that all the columns defined in this index
have to be marked as NOT NULL. There was a hole in the logic with ALTER
TABLE DROP NOT NULL, where it was possible to remove the NOT NULL
property of a column part of an index used as replica identity, so block
it to avoid problems with logical decoding down the road.
The same check was already done columns part of a primary key, so the
fix is straight-forward.
Author: Haiying Tang, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB6113338C102BEE8B2FFC5BD9FB619@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 10
It's possible that a subplan below a Memoize node contains a parameter
from above the Memoize node. If this parameter changes then cache entries
may become out-dated due to the new parameter value.
Previously Memoize was mistakenly not aware of this. We fix this here by
flushing the cache whenever a parameter that's not part of the cache
key changes.
Bug: #17213
Reported by: Elvis Pranskevichus
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17213-988ed34b225a2862@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was added
It's possible that a subplan below a Memoize node contains a parameter
from above the Memoize node. If this parameter changes then cache entries
may become out-dated due to the new parameter value.
Previously Memoize was mistakenly not aware of this. We fix this here by
flushing the cache whenever a parameter that's not part of the cache
key changes.
Bug: #17213
Reported by: Elvis Pranskevichus
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17213-988ed34b225a2862@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was added
Memoize would always use the hash equality operator for the cache key
types to determine if the current set of parameters were the same as some
previously cached set. Certain types such as floating points where -0.0
and +0.0 differ in their binary representation but are classed as equal by
the hash equality operator may cause problems as unless the join uses the
same operator it's possible that whichever join operator is being used
would be able to distinguish the two values. In which case we may
accidentally return in the incorrect rows out of the cache.
To fix this here we add a binary mode to Memoize to allow it to the
current set of parameters to previously cached values by comparing
bit-by-bit rather than logically using the hash equality operator. This
binary mode is always used for LATERAL joins and it's used for normal
joins when any of the join operators are not hashable.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3004308.1632952496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was added
This commit adds a set of functions able to look at the contents of
various paths related to replication slots:
- pg_ls_logicalsnapdir, for pg_logical/snapshots/
- pg_ls_logicalmapdir, for pg_logical/mappings/
- pg_ls_replslotdir, for pg_replslot/<slot_name>/
These are intended to be used by monitoring tools. Unlike pg_ls_dir(),
execution permission can be granted to non-superusers. Roles members of
pg_monitor gain have access to those functions.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWsfizZjMN6bzzdxOk1ADQQeSw8HhEjhmVXn_Pu+7VzLw@mail.gmail.com
Commit ac9099fc1 rearranged the logic in spgGetCache() that determines
the index's attType (nominal input data type) and leafType (actual
type stored in leaf index tuples). Turns out this broke things for
the case where (a) the actual input data type is different from the
nominal type, (b) the opclass's config function leaves leafType
defaulted, and (c) the opclass has no "compress" function. (b) caused
us to assign the actual input data type as leafType, and then since
that's not attType, we complained that a "compress" function is
required. For non-polymorphic opclasses, condition (a) arises in
binary-compatible cases, such as using SP-GiST text_ops for a varchar
column, or using any opclass on a domain over its nominal input type.
To fix, use attType for leafType when the index's declared column type
is different from but binary-compatible with attType. Do this only in
the defaulted-leafType case, to avoid overriding any explicit
selection made by the opclass.
Per bug #17294 from Ilya Anfimov. Back-patch to v14.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17294-8f6c7962ce877edc@postgresql.org
This commit adds to the main regression test suite a table with all
the in-core data types (some exceptions apply). This table is not
dropped, so as pg_upgrade would be able to check the binary
compatibility of the types tracked in the table. If a new type is added
in core, this part of the tests would need a refresh but the tests are
designed to fail if that were to happen.
As this is useful for upgrades and that these rely on the objects
created in the regression test suite of the old version upgraded from,
a backpatch down to 12 is done, which is the last point where a binary
incompatible change has been done (7c15cef). This will hopefully be
enough to find out if something gets broken during the development of a
new version of Postgres, so as it is possible to take actions in
pg_upgrade itself in this case (like 0ccfc28 for sql_identifier).
An area that is not covered yet is related to external modules, which
may create their own types. The testing infrastructure of pg_upgrade is
not integrated yet with the external modules stored in core
(src/test/modules/ or contrib/, all use the same database name for their
tests so there would be an overlap). This could be improved in the
future.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion, Peter Eisentraut, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201206180248.GI24052@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 12
This fills in some gaps in planner support for starts_with() and
the equivalent ^@ operator:
* A condition such as "textcol ^@ constant" can now use a regular
btree index, not only an SP-GiST index, so long as the index's
collation is C. (This works just like "textcol LIKE 'foo%'".)
* "starts_with(textcol, constant)" can be optimized the same as
"textcol ^@ constant".
* Fixed-prefix LIKE and regex patterns are now more like starts_with()
in another way: if you apply one to an SPGiST-indexed column, you'll
get an index condition using ^@ rather than two index conditions with
>= and <.
Per a complaint from Shay Rojansky. Patch by me; thanks to
Nathan Bossart for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/232599.1633800229@sss.pgh.pa.us
If a SQL-standard function body contains an INSERT ... SELECT statement,
any function parameters referenced within the SELECT were always printed
in $N style, rather than using the parameter name if any. While not
strictly incorrect, this wasn't the intention, and it's inconsistent
with the way that such parameters would be printed in any other kind
of statement.
The cause is that the recursion to get_query_def from
get_insert_query_def neglected to pass down the context->namespaces
list, passing constant NIL instead. This is a very ancient oversight,
but AFAICT it had no visible consequences before commit e717a9a18
added an outermost namespace with function parameters. We don't allow
INSERT ... SELECT as a sub-query, except in a top-level WITH clause,
where it couldn't contain any outer references that might need to access
upper namespaces. So although that's arguably a bug, I don't see any
point in changing it before v14.
In passing, harden the code added to get_parameter by e717a9a18 so that
it won't crash if a PARAM_EXTERN Param appears in an unexpected place.
Per report from Erki Eessaar. Code fix by me, regression test case
by Masahiko Sawada.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM9PR01MB8268347BED344848555167FAFE949@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
Commit 81d5995b4b introduced more fine-grained errormessages for
incorrect relkinds for publication, while unlogged and temporary
tables were reported with using the same message. This provides
separate error messages for these types of relpersistence.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACW9S=AswyQHjtO6WMcsergMkCBTtzXGrM8DX26DzfeTLQ@mail.gmail.com
pg_stat_get_slru() in pgstatfuncs.c would point to one element after the
end of the array PgStat_SLRUStats when finishing to scan its entries.
This had no direct consequences as no data from the extra memory area
was read, but static analyzers would rightfully complain here. So let's
be clean.
While on it, this adds one regression test in the area reserved for
system views.
Reported-by: Alexander Kozhemyakin, via AddressSanitizer
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17280-37da556e86032070@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
PostgreSQL 13 and newer versions are directly impacted by that through
the SQL function normalize(), which would cause a call of this function
to write one byte past its allocation if using in input an empty
string after recomposing the string with NFC and NFKC. Older versions
(v10~v12) are not directly affected by this problem as the only code
path using normalization is SASLprep in SCRAM authentication that
forbids the case of an empty string, but let's make the code more robust
anyway there so as any out-of-core callers of this function are covered.
The solution chosen to fix this issue is simple, with the addition of a
fast-exit path if the decomposed string is found as empty. This would
only happen for an empty string as at its lowest level a codepoint would
be decomposed as itself if it has no entry in the decomposition table or
if it has a decomposition size of 0.
Some tests are added to cover this issue in v13~. Note that an empty
string has always been considered as normalized (grammar "IS NF[K]{C,D}
NORMALIZED", through the SQL function is_normalized()) for all the
operations allowed (NFC, NFD, NFKC and NFKD) since this feature has been
introduced as of 2991ac5. This behavior is unchanged but some tests are
added in v13~ to check after that.
I have also checked "make normalization-check" in src/common/unicode/,
while on it (works in 13~, and breaks in older stable branches
independently of this commit).
The release notes should just mention this commit for v13~.
Reported-by: Matthijs van der Vleuten
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17277-0c527a373794e802@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 10
The tsvector data type has always forbidden lexemes to be empty.
However, array_to_tsvector() didn't get that memo, and would
allow an empty-string array element to become an empty lexeme.
This could result in dump/restore failures later, not to mention
whatever semantic issues might be behind the original prohibition.
However, other functions that take a plain text input directly as
a lexeme value do not need a similar restriction, because they only
match the string against existing tsvector entries. In particular
it'd be a bad idea to make ts_delete() reject empty strings, since
that is the most convenient way to clean up any bad data that might
have gotten into a tsvector column via this bug.
Reflecting on that, let's also remove the prohibition against NULL
array elements in tsvector_delete_arr and tsvector_setweight_by_filter.
It seems more consistent to ignore them, as an empty-string element
would be ignored.
There's a case for back-patching this, since it's clearly a bug fix.
On balance though, it doesn't seem like something to change in a
minor release.
Jean-Christophe Arnu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHZmTm1YVndPgUVRoag2WL0w900XcoiivDDj-gTTYBsG25c65A@mail.gmail.com
When calculating distance between float4/float8 values, we need to be a
bit more careful about NaN values in order not to trigger assert. We
consider NaN values to be equal (distace 0.0) and in infinite distance
from all other values.
On builds without asserts, this issue is mostly harmless - the ranges
may be merged in less efficient order, but the index is still correct.
Per report from Andreas Seltenreich. Backpatch to 14, where this new
BRIN opclass was introduced.
Reported-by: Andreas Seltenreich
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87r1bw9ukm.fsf@credativ.de
Commit b4af70cb, which simplified state managed by VACUUM, performed
refactoring of parallel VACUUM in passing. Confusion about the exact
details of the tasks that the leader process is responsible for led to
code that made it possible for parallel VACUUM to miss a subset of the
table's indexes entirely. Specifically, indexes that fell under the
min_parallel_index_scan_size size cutoff were missed. These indexes are
supposed to be vacuumed by the leader (alongside any parallel unsafe
indexes), but weren't vacuumed at all. Affected indexes could easily
end up with duplicate heap TIDs, once heap TIDs were recycled for new
heap tuples. This had generic symptoms that might be seen with almost
any index corruption involving structural inconsistencies between an
index and its table.
To fix, make sure that the parallel VACUUM leader process performs any
required index vacuuming for indexes that happen to be below the size
cutoff. Also document the design of parallel VACUUM with these
below-size-cutoff indexes.
It's unclear how many users might be affected by this bug. There had to
be at least three indexes on the table to hit the bug: a smaller index,
plus at least two additional indexes that themselves exceed the size
cutoff. Cases with just one additional index would not run into
trouble, since the parallel VACUUM cost model requires two
larger-than-cutoff indexes on the table to apply any parallel
processing. Note also that autovacuum was not affected, since it never
uses parallel processing.
Test case based on tests from a larger patch to test parallel VACUUM by
Masahiko Sawada.
Many thanks to Kamigishi Rei for her invaluable help with tracking this
problem down.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-By: Kamigishi Rei <iijima.yun@koumakan.jp>
Reported-By: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Diagnosed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Bug: #17245
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245-ddf06aaf85735f36@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211030023740.qbnsl2xaoh2grq3d@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 14-, where the refactoring commit appears.
The opclass parameter Datums from the old index are fetched in the same
way as for predicates and expressions, by grabbing them directly from
the system catalogs. They are then copied into the new IndexInfo that
will be used for the creation of the new copy.
This caused the new index to be rebuilt with default parameters rather
than the ones pre-defined by a user. The only way to get back a new
index with correct opclass parameters would be to recreate a new index
from scratch.
The issue has been introduced by 911e702.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YX0CG/QpLXcPr8HJ@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
We had a test showing that a variable isn't referenceable in its
own initialization expression, nor in prior ones in the same block.
It *is* referenceable in later expressions in the same block, but
AFAICS there is no test case exercising that. Add one, and also
add some error cases.
Also, document that this is possible, since the docs failed to
cover the point.
Per question from tomás at tuxteam. I don't feel any need to
back-patch this, but we should ensure we don't break it in future.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211029121435.GA5414@tuxteam.de
Grant privileges on views pg_backend_memory_contexts and
pg_shmem_allocations to the role pg_read_all_stats. Also grant on the
underlying functions that those views depend on.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWAZo3Ar_EVsn2Zf9irG+hYK3cmh1KWhZS_Od45nd01RA@mail.gmail.com
A new option "FOR ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA" in Create/Alter Publication allows
one or more schemas to be specified, whose tables are selected by the
publisher for sending the data to the subscriber.
The new syntax allows specifying both the tables and schemas. For example:
CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR TABLE t1,t2,t3, ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA s1,s2;
OR
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD TABLE t1,t2,t3, ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA s1,s2;
A new system table "pg_publication_namespace" has been added, to maintain
the schemas that the user wants to publish through the publication.
Modified the output plugin (pgoutput) to publish the changes if the
relation is part of schema publication.
Updates pg_dump to identify and dump schema publications. Updates the \d
family of commands to display schema publications and \dRp+ variant will
now display associated schemas if any.
Author: Vignesh C, Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila
Syntax-Suggested-by: Tom Lane, Alvaro Herrera
Reviewed-by: Greg Nancarrow, Masahiko Sawada, Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila, Haiying Tang, Ajin Cherian, Rahila Syed, Bharath Rupireddy, Mark Dilger
Tested-by: Haiying Tang
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0OANxuJ6RXqwZsM1MSY4s19nuH3734j4a72etDwvBETQ@mail.gmail.com
Remove superuser check, allowing any user granted permissions on
pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() to log the memory contexts of any
backend.
Note that this could allow a privileged non-superuser to log the
memory contexts of a superuser backend, but as discussed, that does
not seem to be a problem.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Bharath Rupireddy, Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e5cf6684d17c8d1ef4904ae248605ccd6da03e72.camel@j-davis.com
The foreign data wrapper's validator function provides a HINT message with
list of valid options for the object specified in CREATE or ALTER command,
when the option given in the command is invalid. Previously
postgresql_fdw_validator() and the validator functions for postgres_fdw and
dblink_fdw worked in that way even there were no valid options in the object,
which could lead to the HINT message with empty list (because there were
no valid options). For example, ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw
OPTIONS (format 'csv') reported the following ERROR and HINT messages.
This behavior was confusing.
ERROR: invalid option "format"
HINT: Valid options in this context are:
There is no such issue in file_fdw. The validator function for file_fdw
reports the HINT message "There are no valid options in this context."
instead in that case.
This commit improves postgresql_fdw_validator() and the validator functions
for postgres_fdw and dblink_fdw so that they do likewise. For example,
this change causes the above ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER command to
report the following messages.
ERROR: invalid option "nonexistent"
HINT: There are no valid options in this context.
Author: Kosei Masumura
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/557d06cebe19081bfcc83ee2affc98d3@oss.nttdata.com
Commit 1b5d797cd4 intended to relax the lock level used to rename
indexes, but inadvertently allowed *any* relation to be renamed with a
lowered lock level, as long as the command is spelled ALTER INDEX.
That's undesirable for other relation types, so retry the operation with
the higher lock if the relation turns out not to be an index.
After this fix, ALTER INDEX <sometable> RENAME will require access
exclusive lock, which it didn't before.
Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Onder Kalaci <onderk@microsoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH0PR21MB1328189E2821CDEC646F8178D8AE9@PH0PR21MB1328.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
An update such as "UPDATE ... SET fld[n].subfld = whatever"
failed if the array elements were domains rather than plain
composites. That's because isAssignmentIndirectionExpr()
failed to cope with the CoerceToDomain node that would appear
in the expression tree in this case. The result would typically
be a crash, and even if we accidentally didn't crash, we'd not
correctly preserve other fields of the same array element.
Per report from Onder Kalaci. Back-patch to v11 where arrays of
domains came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH0PR21MB132823A46AA36F0685B7A29AD8BD9@PH0PR21MB1328.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
The grammar of this command run on indexes with column names has always
been authorized by the parser, and it has never been documented.
Since 911e702, it is possible to define opclass parameters as of CREATE
INDEX, which actually broke the old case of ALTER INDEX/TABLE where
relation-level parameters n_distinct and n_distinct_inherited could be
defined for an index (see 76a47c0 and its thread where this point has
been touched, still remained unused). Attempting to do that in v13~
would cause the index to become unusable, as there is a new dedicated
code path to load opclass parameters instead of the relation-level ones
previously available. Note that it is possible to fix things with a
manual catalog update to bring the relation back online.
This commit disables this command for now as the use of column names for
indexes does not make sense anyway, particularly when it comes to index
expressions where names are automatically computed. One way to properly
support this case properly in the future would be to use column numbers
when it comes to indexes, in the same way as ALTER INDEX .. ALTER COLUMN
.. SET STATISTICS.
Partitioned indexes were already blocked, but not indexes. Some tests
are added for both cases.
There was some code in ANALYZE to enforce n_distinct to be used for an
index expression if the parameter was defined, but just remove it for
now until/if there is support for this (note that index-level parameters
never had support in pg_dump either, previously), so this was just dead
code.
Reported-by: Matthijs van der Vleuten
Author: Nathan Bossart, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing, Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17220-15d684c6c2171a83@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Failing to do that, any direct inserts/updates of those partitions
would fail to enforce the correct constraint, that is, one that
considers the new partition constraint of their parent table.
Backpatch to 10.
Reported by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB5718DA1C4609A25186D1FBF194089%40OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
If a function-in-FROM laterally references the output of some sub-SELECT
earlier in the FROM clause, and we are able to flatten that sub-SELECT
into the outer query, the expression(s) copied into the function RTE
missed being processed by eval_const_expressions. This'd lead to trouble
and probable crashes at execution if such expressions contained
named-argument function call syntax or functions with defaulted arguments.
The bug is masked if the query contains any explicit JOIN syntax, which
may help explain why we'd not noticed.
Per bug #17227 from Bernd Dorn. This is an oversight in commit 7266d0997,
so back-patch to v13 where that came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17227-5a28ed1512189fa4@postgresql.org
This fixes a loss of precision that occurs when the first input is
very close to 1, so that its logarithm is very small.
Formerly, during the initial low-precision calculation to estimate the
result weight, the logarithm was computed to a local rscale that was
capped to NUMERIC_MAX_DISPLAY_SCALE (1000). However, the base may be
as close as 1e-16383 to 1, hence its logarithm may be as small as
1e-16383, and so the local rscale needs to be allowed to exceed 16383,
otherwise all precision is lost, leading to a poor choice of rscale
for the full-precision calculation.
Fix this by removing the cap on the local rscale during the initial
low-precision calculation, as we already do in the full-precision
calculation. This doesn't change the fact that the initial calculation
is a low-precision approximation, computing the logarithm to around 8
significant digits, which is very fast, especially when the base is
very close to 1.
Patch by me, reviewed by Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCV-Ceu%2BHpRMf416yUe4KKFv%3DtdgXQAe5-7S9tD%3D5E-T1g%40mail.gmail.com
Prior to v14, we insisted that the query in RETURN QUERY be of a type
that returns tuples. (For instance, INSERT RETURNING was allowed,
but not plain INSERT.) That happened indirectly because we opened a
cursor for the query, so spi.c checked SPI_is_cursor_plan(). As a
consequence, the error message wasn't terribly on-point, but at least
it was there.
Commit 2f48ede08 lost this detail. Instead, plain RETURN QUERY
insisted that the query be a SELECT (by checking for SPI_OK_SELECT)
while RETURN QUERY EXECUTE failed to check the query type at all.
Neither of these changes was intended.
The only convenient place to check this in the EXECUTE case is inside
_SPI_execute_plan, because we haven't done parse analysis until then.
So we need to pass down a flag saying whether to enforce that the
query returns tuples. Fortunately, we can squeeze another boolean
into struct SPIExecuteOptions without an ABI break, since there's
padding space there. (It's unlikely that any extensions would
already be using this new struct, but preserving ABI in v14 seems
like a smart idea anyway.)
Within spi.c, it seemed like _SPI_execute_plan's parameter list
was already ridiculously long, and I didn't want to make it longer.
So I thought of passing SPIExecuteOptions down as-is, allowing that
parameter list to become much shorter. This makes the patch a bit
more invasive than it might otherwise be, but it's all internal to
spi.c, so that seems fine.
Per report from Marc Bachmann. Back-patch to v14 where the
faulty code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1F2F75F0-27DF-406F-848D-8B50C7EEF06A@gmail.com
Updates/Deletes on a partition were allowed even without replica identity
after the parent table was added to a publication. This would later lead
to an error on subscribers. The reason was that we were not invalidating
the partition's relcache and the publication information for partitions
was not getting rebuilt. Similarly, we were not invalidating the
partitions' relcache after dropping a partitioned table from a publication
which will prohibit Updates/Deletes on its partition without replica
identity even without any publication.
Reported-by: Haiying Tang
Author: Hou Zhijie and Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB6113D77F583C922F1CEAA1C3FBD29@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Commit 55dc86eca changed pull_varnos to use (if possible) the associated
ph_eval_at for a PlaceHolderVar. I missed a fine point though: we might
be looking at a PHV in the quals or tlist of a child appendrel, in which
case we need to compute a ph_eval_at value that's been translated in the
same way that the PHV itself has been (cf. adjust_appendrel_attrs).
Fortunately, enough info is available in the PlaceHolderInfo to make
such translation possible without additional outside data, so we don't
need another round of uglification of planner APIs. This is a little
bit complicated, but since it's a hard-to-hit corner case, I'm not much
worried about adding cycles here.
Per report from Jaime Casanova. Back-patch to v12, like the previous
commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210915230959.GB17635@ahch-to
The rewriter transformation for SEARCH BREADTH FIRST produces a
FieldSelect on a Var of type RECORD, where the Var references the
recursive union's worktable output. EXPLAIN VERBOSE failed to handle
this case, because it only expected such Vars to appear in CteScans
not WorkTableScans. Fix that, and add some test cases exercising
EXPLAIN on SEARCH and CYCLE queries.
In principle this oversight is an old bug, but it seems that the
case is unreachable without SEARCH BREADTH FIRST, because the
parser fails when attempting to create such a reference manually.
So for today I'll just patch HEAD/v14. Someday we might find that
the code portion of this patch needs to be back-patched further.
Per report from Atsushi Torikoshi.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5bafa66ad529e11860339565c9e7c166@oss.nttdata.com
