Commit 600086f47 added (several bespoke copies of) size_t addition with
overflow checks to libpq. Move this to common/int.h, along with
its subtraction and multiplication counterparts.
pg_neg_size_overflow() is intentionally omitted; I'm not sure we should
add SSIZE_MAX to win32_port.h for the sake of a function with no
callers.
Back-patch of commit 8934f2136, done now because pg_add_size_overflow()
and friends are needed more widely for security fixes.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi%2B%3D%2BpqUd2MUitvgW1pAJuXgG_TKCVc3_Ek7pe8z9nkf%2BAg%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14-18
Security: CVE-2026-6473
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return INT64_MIN.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Patch be me. Thanks to Jian He for initial investigation, and Laurenz
Albe and Tom Lane for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUNK-AZSD0jVdgkk0N%3DNcAXBWeAEX-QU9AnJPensikmdQ%40mail.gmail.com
Similarly to the signed versions added in 4d6ad31, this adds a set of
inline functions for overflow checks with unsigned integers, including
uint16, uint32 and uint64. This relies on compiler built-in overflow
checks by default if available. The behavior of unsigned integers is
well-defined so the fallback implementations checks are simple for
additions and subtractions. Multiplications avoid division-based checks
which are expensive if possible, still this can happen for uint64 if
128-bit integers are not available.
While on it, the code in common/int.h is reorganized to avoid too many
duplicated comments. The new macros will be used in a follow-up patch.
All thanks to Andres Freund for the input provided.
Author: Fabien Coelho, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190830073423.GB2354@paquier.xyz
Some older compilers otherwise sometimes complain about undefined
values, even though the return value should not be used in the
overflow case. We assume that any decent compiler will optimize away
the unnecessary assignment in performance critical cases.
We do not want to restrain the returned value to a specific value,
e.g. 0 or the wrapped-around value, because some fast ways to
implement overflow detecting math do not easily allow for
that (e.g. msvc intrinsics). As the function documentation already
documents the returned value in case of intrinsics to be
implementation defined, no documentation has to be updated.
Per complaint from Tom Lane and his buildfarm member prairiedog.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18169.1513958454@sss.pgh.pa.us
It's not easy to get signed integer overflow checks correct and
fast. Therefore abstract the necessary infrastructure into a common
header providing addition, subtraction and multiplication for 16, 32,
64 bit signed integers.
The new macros aren't yet used, but a followup commit will convert
several open coded overflow checks.
Author: Andres Freund, with some code stolen from Greg Stark
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171024103954.ztmatprlglz3rwke@alap3.anarazel.de
