Use the built-in TypeError, not SPIError, for errors having to do with
argument counts or types. Use SPIError, not simply plpy.Error, for
errors in PLy_spi_execute_plan. Finally, do not set a Python
exception if PyArg_ParseTuple failed, as it already sets the correct
exception.
Jan Urbański
It's not clear to me what should happen to the other plpython_unicode
variant expected files, but this patch gets things passing on my own
machines and at least some of the buildfarm.
Mimic the Python interpreter's own logic for printing exceptions instead
of just using the straight str() call, so that
you get
plpy.SPIError
instead of
<class 'plpy.SPIError'>
and for built-in exceptions merely
UnicodeEncodeError
Besides looking better this cuts down on the endless version differences
in the regression test expected files.
Check calls of PyUnicode_AsEncodedString() for NULL return, probably
because the encoding name is not known. Add special treatment for
SQL_ASCII, which Python definitely does not know.
Since using SQL_ASCII produces errors in the regression tests when
non-ASCII characters are involved, we have to put back various regression
test result variants.
PL/Python now accepts Unicode objects where it previously only accepted string
objects (for example, as return value). Unicode objects are converted to the
PostgreSQL server encoding as necessary.
This change is also necessary for future Python 3 support, which treats all
strings as Unicode objects.
Since this removes the error conditions that the plpython_unicode test file
tested for, the alternative result files are no longer necessary.
Extract the "while creating return value" and "while modifying trigger
row" parts of some error messages into another layer of error context.
This will simplify the upcoming patch to improve data type support, but
it can stand on its own.
of the previous monolithic setup-create-run sequence, that was apparently
inherited from a previous test infrastructure, but makes working with the
tests and adding new ones weird.
