Currently there is a race condition where if concurrent TAP tests both
test that they can open a port they will assume that it is free and use
it, causing one of them to fail. To prevent this we record a reservation
using an exclusive lock, and any TAP test that discovers a reservation
checks to see if the reserving process is still alive, and looks for
another free port if it is.
Ports are reserved in a directory set by the environment setting
PG_TEST_PORT_DIR, or if that doesn't exist a subdirectory of the top
build directory as set by meson or Makefile.global, or its own
tmp_check directory.
The prove_check recipe in Makefile.global.in is extended to export
top_builddir to the TAP tests. This was already exported by the
prove_installcheck recipes.
Per complaint from Andres Freund
This will be backpatched in due course after some testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221002164931.d57hlutrcz4d2zi7@awork3.anarazel.de
The test output varies when debug_discard_caches is enabled,
because that causes extra executions of recomputeNamespacePath.
Maybe putting a hook in that was a bad idea, but as a stopgap,
just turn off debug_discard_caches in this test.
Per buildfarm (now that we have debug_discard_caches coverage
again). Back-patch to v15 where this module was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2267406.1668804934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Similar to how the INHERIT option controls whether or not the
permissions of the granted role are automatically available to the
grantee, the new SET permission controls whether or not the grantee
may use the SET ROLE command to assume the privileges of the granted
role.
In addition, the new SET permission controls whether or not it
is possible to transfer ownership of objects to the target role
or to create new objects owned by the target role using commands
such as CREATE DATABASE .. OWNER. We could alternatively have made
this controlled by the INHERIT option, or allow it when either
option is given. An advantage of this approach is that if you
are granted a predefined role with INHERIT TRUE, SET FALSE, you
can't go and create objects owned by that role.
The underlying theory here is that the ability to create objects
as a target role is not a privilege per se, and thus does not
depend on whether you inherit the target role's privileges. However,
it's surely something you could do anyway if you could SET ROLE
to the target role, and thus making it contingent on whether you
have that ability is reasonable.
Design review by Nathan Bossat, Wolfgang Walther, Jeff Davis,
Peter Eisentraut, and Stephen Frost.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmob+zDSRS6JXYrgq0NWdzCXuTNzT5eK54Dn2hhgt17nm8A@mail.gmail.com
The object_address test file turns to psql unaligned output for some
tests to avoid huge diffs for changes. But this is useful also to the
other large test in that file, so apply it there as well. This also
makes verifying the null and whitespace behavior easier.
Version strings with unequal numbers of parts were being compared
incorrectly. We cure this by treating a missing part in the shorter
version as 0.
per complaint from Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais, but the fix is mine, not
his.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220628225325.53d97b8d@karst
Backpatch to release 14 where this code was introduced.
As introduced in 006b69f, the order of the headers was incorrect.
However, it happens that lwlock.h can just be dropped from the list, so
let's be clean and remove it, fixing the order of the listed headers.
Commit 1cc29fe7c, which taught EXPLAIN to print PARAM_EXEC Params as
the referenced expressions, included some checks to prevent matching
Params found in SubPlans or InitPlans to NestLoopParams of upper query
levels. At the time, this seemed possibly necessary to avoid false
matches because of the planner's habit of re-using the same PARAM_EXEC
slot in multiple places in a plan. Furthermore, in the absence of
LATERAL no such reference could be valid anyway. But it's possible
now that we have LATERAL, and in the wake of 46c508fbc and 1db5667ba
I believe the false-match hazard is gone. Hence, remove the
in_same_plan_level checks. As shown in the regression test changes,
this provides a useful improvement in readability for EXPLAIN of
LATERAL-using subplans.
Richard Guo, reviewed by Greg Stark and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-YSOcQXAagJetP95cAeZPqzOy5kM5yijG0PVW5ztRb4w@mail.gmail.com
We can re-use the clusters set up for this test script's first test,
instead of generating new ones. On my machine this is good for
about a 20% reduction in this script's runtime, from ~6.5 sec to
~5.2 sec.
This idea could be taken further, but it'd require a much more invasive
patch. These cases are easy because the Perl variable names were
already being re-used.
Anton A. Melnikov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/eb7aa992-c2d7-6ce7-4942-0c784231a362@inbox.ru
This commit introduces a basic facility to test SLRUs, in terms of
initialization, page reads, writes, flushes, truncation and deletions,
using SQL wrappers around the APIs of slru.c. This should be easily
extensible at will, and it can be used as a starting point for someone
willing to implement an external module that makes use of SLRUs (LWLock
tranche registering and SLRU initialization particularly).
As this requires a loaded library, the tests use a custom configuration
file and are disabled under installcheck.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Daniel Gustafsson, Noah Misch, Maxim Orlov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TOFoWcHOW4BVe3BG_uikCrO9B91ayx9d6rh5JZr_tPESg@mail.gmail.com
This adds a new psql command \bind that sets query parameters and
causes the next query to be sent using the extended query protocol.
Example:
SELECT $1, $2 \bind 'foo' 'bar' \g
This may be useful for psql scripting, but one of the main purposes is
also to be able to test various aspects of the extended query protocol
from psql and to write tests more easily.
Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e8dd1cd5-0e04-3598-0518-a605159fe314@enterprisedb.com
The current code looks for the sample file in the source directory, but
it seems better to test against the installed sample file.
Backpatch to release 15 where the test was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/73eea68e-3b6f-5f63-6024-25ed26b52016@dunslane.net
Reviewed by Tom Lane, Alvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier.
Currently this only allows for one argument, which must be present, and
always returns a single string. With this change the following now all
work:
$all_config = $node->config_data;
%config_map = ($node->config_data);
$incdir = $node->config_data('--include-dir');
($incdir, $sharedir) = $node->config_data(
qw(--include-dir --share-dir));
Backpatch to release 15 where this was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/73eea68e-3b6f-5f63-6024-25ed26b52016@dunslane.net
Reviewed by Tom Lane, Alvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier.
Test files should now ignore has_wal_read_bug() so long as
wait_for_catchup() is their only known way of reaching the bug. That's
at least five files today, a number expected to grow over time. This
commit removes skip logic from three. By doing so, systems having the
bug regain the ability to catch other kinds of defects via those three
tests. The other two, 002_databases.pl and 031_recovery_conflict.pl,
have been unprotected. Back-patch to v15, where done_testing() first
became our standard.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221030031639.GA3082137@rfd.leadboat.com
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the expected table
rewrite to actually happen.
Fix that, and add the missing checks that would have exposed the
problem to begin with.
Noted while reviewing a patch that made changes in this test case.
Back-patch to v11 where the problem came in.
Previously, trying to set storage parameters on a partitioned table
always led to "unrecognized parameter foo", because the code expected
there might be some valid parameters; but there aren't any. The docs
make clear that it's intended that there never will be any, so let's
replace this useless search with a more to-the-point message.
Simon Riggs and Karina Litskevich
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-H=eZ9kTR9mUgKGK0Qv9uXP=U+dQg3rinQHfTdFMhBA2A@mail.gmail.com
\d+ is already able to show if a partition or a child table is
"PARTITIONED" via its relkind, hence the addition of a keyword for
"FOREIGN" in the relation description is basically free.
Author: Ian Lawrence Barwick
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB8KJ=iwzbEz2HR9EhNxQLVhMk2G_OYtQPJ9V=jWLadseggrOA@mail.gmail.com
A NULL result should be reported when a stats timestamp is set to 0, but
c037471 missed that, leading to a confusing timestamp value after for
example a DML on a freshly-created relation with no scans done on it
yet.
This impacted the following attributes for two system views:
- pg_stat_all_tables.last_idx_scan
- pg_stat_all_tables.last_seq_scan
- pg_stat_all_indexes.last_idx_scan
Reported-by: Robert Treat
Analyzed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Author: Dave Page
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABV9wwPzMfSaz3EfKXXDxKmMprbxwF5r6WPuxqA=5mzRUqfTGg@mail.gmail.com
"Triggers on partitioned tables cannot have transition tables." is
incorrect as we allow statement-level triggers on partitioned tables to
have transition tables.
This has been wrong since commit 86f575948; back-patch to v11 where that
commit came in.
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17gk4vXLzz2iG%2BG4LWRWCoVyam70nZ3OuGm1hMJwDrhcg%40mail.gmail.com
Commit f56f8f8da6 added some code in CloneFkReferencing that's way too
lax about a Constraint node it manufactures, not initializing enough
struct members -- initially_valid in particular was forgotten. This
causes some FKs in partitions added by ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION to
be marked as not validated. Set initially_valid true, which fixes the
bug.
While at it, make the struct initialization more complete. Very similar
code was added in two other places by the same commit; make them all
follow the same pattern for consistency, though no bugs are apparent
there.
This bug has never been reported: I only happened to notice while
working on commit 614a406b4f. The test case that was added there with
the improper result is repaired.
Backpatch to 12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221005105523.bhuhkdx4olajboof@alvherre.pgsql
Based on the existing coverage report, some combinations were not
checked at all, so add some tests to do so. Spotted while looking at
the area.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y2DNm9u7hzIxCXHn@paquier.xyz
Some cases would result in "cache lookup failed for statistics object",
due to trying to fetch inherited statistics when only non-inherited
ones are available or vice versa.
Richard Guo and Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221030170520.GM16921@telsasoft.com
Add some simple tests that the planner recognizes all the
standard idioms for SEMI and ANTI joins. Failure to optimize
in this way won't necessarily cause any visible change in
query results, so check the plans. We had no similar coverage
before, at least for some variants of antijoin, as noted by
Richard Guo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-mvPPCJ1W6iK6dD5HiNwoJdi6mZp=-7mE8N9Sh+cd0tQ@mail.gmail.com
When all of the query's DISTINCT pathkeys have been marked as redundant
due to EquivalenceClasses existing which contain constants, we can just
implement the DISTINCT operation on a query by just limiting the number of
returned rows to 1 instead of performing a Unique on all of the matching
(duplicate) rows.
This applies in cases such as:
SELECT DISTINCT col,col2 FROM tab WHERE col = 1 AND col2 = 10;
If there are any matching rows, then they must all be {1,10}. There's no
point in fetching all of those and running a Unique operator on them to
leave only a single row. Here we effectively just find the first row and
then stop. We are obviously unable to apply this optimization if either
the col = 1 or col2 = 10 were missing from the WHERE clause or if there
were any additional columns in the SELECT clause.
Such queries are probably not all that common, but detecting when we can
apply this optimization amounts to checking if the distinct_pathkeys are
NULL, which is very cheap indeed.
Nothing is done here to check if the query already has a LIMIT clause. If
it does then the plan may end up with 2 Limits nodes. There's no harm in
that and it's probably not worth the complexity to unify them into a
single Limit node.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqS0j8RUWRUSgCAXxOqnYjHUXmKwspRj4GzVfOO25ByHA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYPR01MB7101CD5DA0A07C9DE2B74850A4239@MEYPR01MB7101.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com
When we decide we need to make a derived clause equating a.x and
b.y, we already will re-use a previously-made clause "a.x = b.y".
But we might instead have "b.y = a.x", which is perfectly usable
because equivclass.c has never promised anything about the
operand order in clauses it builds. Saving construction of a
new RestrictInfo doesn't matter all that much in itself --- but
because we cache selectivity estimates and so on per-RestrictInfo,
there's a possibility of saving a fair amount of duplicative
effort downstream.
Hence, check for commutative matches as well as direct ones when
seeing if we have a pre-existing clause. This changes the visible
clause order in several regression test cases, but they're all
clearly-insignificant changes.
Checking for the reverse operand order is simple enough, but
if we wanted to check for operator OID match we'd need to call
get_commutator here, which is not so cheap. I concluded that
we don't really need the operator check anyway, so I just
removed it. It's unlikely that an opfamily contains more than
one applicable operator for a given pair of operand datatypes;
and if it does they had better give the same answers, so there
seems little need to insist that we use exactly the one
select_equality_operator chose.
Using the current core regression suite as a test case, I see
this change reducing the number of new join clauses built by
create_join_clause from 9673 to 5142 (out of 26652 calls).
So not quite 50% savings, but pretty close to it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/78062.1666735746@sss.pgh.pa.us
As the recent commit 05d4cbf (reverted after as a448e49) has proved,
there is zero coverage for the four SQL functions that can scan the
control file data:
- pg_control_checkpoint()
- pg_control_init()
- pg_control_recovery()
- pg_control_system()
This commit adds a minimal coverage for these functions, checking that
their execution is able to complete. This would have been enough to
catch the problems introduced in the commit mentioned above. More
checks could be done for each individual fields, but it is unclear
whether this would be better than the other checks in place in the
backend code.
Per discussion with Bharath Rupireddy.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y1d2FZmQmyAhPSRG@paquier.xyz
These numbers are strictly-monotone identifiers assigned to each rule
of pg_hba_file_rules and each map of pg_ident_file_mappings when loading
the HBA and ident configuration files, indicating the order in which
they are checked at authentication time, until a match is found.
With only one file loaded currently, this is equivalent to the line
numbers assigned to the entries loaded if one wants to know their order,
but this becomes mandatory once the inclusion of external files is
added to the HBA and ident files to be able to know in which order the
rules and/or maps are applied at authentication. Note that NULL is used
when a HBA or ident entry cannot be parsed or validated, aka when an
error exists, contrary to the line number.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220223045959.35ipdsvbxcstrhya@jrouhaud
Commit df3737a651 added an incorrect assertion about the preconditions
for invoking the backup cleanup callback: it misfires at session end in
case a backup completes successfully. Fix it, using coding from Michaël
Paquier. Also add some tests for the various cases.
Reported by Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221021.161038.1277961198945653224.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
While looking at how these are handled in the parser and the executor, I
have noticed that there is no test coverage for most of these when
reverse-engineering an expression for a SQLValueFunction node in
ruleutils.c, including how these are reparsed when included in a FROM
clause. Some hacking in this area has showed me that these could break
easily, so add some coverage to track the existing compatibility.
Extracted from a much larger patch by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzaG3MoryCguUOym@paquier.xyz
The new tests have been reporting a warning hidden in the logs, as of
"Odd number of elements in hash assignment" (perlcritic or similar did
not report an issue, actually). This comes down to a typo in the test
"matching regexp for username" for a double-quoted regexp using commas,
where we passed an extra argument. The test is intended to pass, but
this was causing the test to fail. This also pointed out that the
newly-added role "md5,role" lacks an entry in the password file used to
provide the password, so add one.
While on it, make the tests pickier by checking the contents of the logs
generated on successful authentication.
Oversights in 8fea868.
As of this commit, any database or user entry beginning with a slash (/)
is considered as a regular expression. This is particularly useful for
users, as now there is no clean way to match pattern on multiple HBA
lines. For example, a user name mapping with a regular expression needs
first to match with a HBA line, and we would skip the follow-up HBA
entries if the ident regexp does *not* match with what has matched in
the HBA line.
pg_hba.conf is able to handle multiple databases and roles with a
comma-separated list of these, hence individual regular expressions that
include commas need to be double-quoted.
At authentication time, user and database names are now checked in the
following order:
- Arbitrary keywords (like "all", the ones beginning by '+' for
membership check), that we know will never have a regexp. A fancy case
is for physical WAL senders, we *have* to only match "replication" for
the database.
- Regular expression matching.
- Exact match.
The previous logic did the same, but without the regexp step.
We have discussed as well the possibility to support regexp pattern
matching for host names, but these happen to lead to tricky issues based
on what I understand, particularly with host entries that have CIDRs.
This commit relies heavily on the refactoring done in a903971 and
fc579e1, so as the amount of code required to compile and execute
regular expressions is now minimal. When parsing pg_hba.conf, all the
computed regexps needs to explicitely free()'d, same as pg_ident.conf.
Documentation and TAP tests are added to cover this feature, including
cases where the regexps use commas (for clarity in the docs, coverage
for the parsing logic in the tests).
Note that this introduces a breakage with older versions, where a
database or user name beginning with a slash are treated as something to
check for an equal match. Per discussion, we have discarded this as
being much of an issue in practice as it would require a cluster to
have database and/or role names that begin with a slash, as well as HBA
entries using these. Hence, the consistency gained with regexps in
pg_ident.conf is more appealing in the long term.
**This compatibility change should be mentioned in the release notes.**
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fff0d7c1-8ad4-76a1-9db3-0ab6ec338bf7@amazon.com
Various test suites use the "openssl" program as part of their setup.
There isn't a way to override which openssl program is to be used,
other than by fiddling with the path, perhaps. This has gotten
increasingly problematic because different versions of openssl have
different capabilities and do different things by default.
This patch checks for an openssl binary in configure and meson setup,
with appropriate ways to override it. This is similar to how "lz4"
and "zstd" are handled, for example. The meson build system actually
already did this, but the result was only used in some places. This
is now applied more uniformly.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dc638b75-a16a-007d-9e1c-d16ed6cf0ad2%40enterprisedb.com
This makes the choice of result scale of numeric power() for integer
exponents consistent with the choice for non-integer exponents, and
with the result scale of other numeric functions. Specifically, the
result scale will be at least as large as the scale of either input,
and sufficient to ensure that the result has at least 16 significant
digits.
Formerly, the result scale was based only on the scale of the first
input, without taking into account the weight of the result. For
results with negative weight, that could lead to results with very few
or even no non-zero significant digits (e.g., 10.0 ^ (-18) produced
0.0000000000000000).
Fix this by moving responsibility for the choice of result scale into
power_var_int(), which already has code to estimate the result weight.
Per report by Adrian Klaver and suggested fix by Tom Lane.
No back-patch -- arguably this is a bug fix, but one which is easy to
work around, so it doesn't seem worth the risk of changing query
results in stable branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12a40226-70ac-3a3b-3d3a-fdaf9e32d312%40aklaver.com
Set up a signal handler for INT/TERM so that we run our END block if we
get them. In END, if the exit status indicates a problem, call
_update_pid(-1) to improve chances of the stop working in case start()
hasn't returned yet.
Also, change END's teardown_node() so that it passes fail_ok=>1, so that
if a node fails to stop, we still stop the other nodes in the same test.
Per complaint from Andres Freund.
This doesn't seem important enough to backpatch, at least for now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220930040734.mbted42oiynhn2t6@awork3.anarazel.de
As currently designed, with a callback registered in a ERROR_CLEANUP
block, the shutdown callback would get called twice when updating
archive_library on SIGHUP, which is something that we want to avoid to
ease the life of extension writers.
Anyway, an ERROR in the archiver process is treated as a FATAL, stopping
it immediately, hence there is no need for a ERROR_CLEANUP block.
Instead of that, the shutdown callback is not called upon
before_shmem_exit(), giving to the modules the opportunity to do any
cleanup actions before the server shuts down its subsystems.
While on it, this commit adds some testing coverage for the shutdown
callback. Neither shell_archive nor basic_archive have been using it,
and one is added to shell_archive, whose trigger is checked in a TAP
test through a shutdown sequence.
Author: Nathan Bossart, Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221015221328.GB1821022@nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 15
Per discussion, the existing routine name able to initialize a SRF
function with materialize mode is unpopular, so rename it. Equally, the
flags of this function are renamed, as of:
- SRF_SINGLE_USE_EXPECTED -> MAT_SRF_USE_EXPECTED_DESC
- SRF_SINGLE_BLESS -> MAT_SRF_BLESS
The previous function and flags introduced in 9e98583 are kept around
for compatibility purposes, so as any extension code already compiled
with v15 continues to work as-is. The declarations introduced here for
compatibility will be removed from HEAD in a follow-up commit.
The new names have been suggested by Andres Freund and Melanie
Plageman.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221013194820.ciktb2sbbpw7cljm@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch-through: 15
When creating a cast that uses a conversion function, we've
historically allowed the input and result types to be
binary-compatible with the function's input and result types,
rather than necessarily being identical. This means that the new
cast is logically dependent on the binary-compatible cast or casts
that it references: if those are defined by pg_cast entries, and you
try to restore the new cast without having defined them, it'll fail.
Hence, we should make pg_depend entries to record these dependencies
so that pg_dump knows that there is an ordering requirement.
This is not the only place where we allow such shortcuts; aggregate
functions for example are similarly lax, and in principle should gain
similar dependencies. However, for now it seems sufficient to fix
the cast-versus-cast case, as pg_dump's other ordering heuristics
should keep it out of trouble for other object types.
Per report from David Turoň; thanks also to Robert Haas for
preliminary investigation. I considered back-patching, but
seeing that this issue has existed for many years without
previous reports, it's not clear it's worth the trouble.
Moreover, back-patching wouldn't be enough to ensure that the
new pg_depend entries exist in existing databases anyway.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OF0A160F3E.578B15D1-ONC12588DA.003E4857-C12588DA.0045A428@notes.linuxbox.cz
There is already some coverage for that in the kerberos test suite,
though it requires PG_TEST_EXTRA to be set as per its insecure nature.
This provides coverage in a default setup, as long as peer is supported
on the platform where its test is run.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7f87ca27-e184-29da-15d6-8be4325ad02e@gmail.com
If the non-recursive term of a SEARCH BREADTH FIRST recursive
query has only constants in its target list, the planner will
fold the starting RowExpr added by rewrite into a simple Const
of type RECORD. The executor doesn't have any problem with
that --- but EXPLAIN VERBOSE will encounter the Const as the
ultimate source of truth about what the field names of the
SET column are, and it didn't know what to do with that.
Fortunately, we can pull the identifying typmod out of the
Const, in much the same way that record_out would.
For reasons that remain a bit obscure to me, this only fails
with SEARCH BREADTH FIRST, not SEARCH DEPTH FIRST or CYCLE.
But I added regression test cases for both of those options
too, just to make sure we don't break it in future.
Per bug #17644 from Matthijs van der Vleuten. Back-patch
to v14 where these constructs were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17644-3bd1f3036d6d7a16@postgresql.org
