The code intends to allow GUCs to be set within parallel workers
via function SET clauses, but not otherwise. However, doing so fails
for "session_authorization" and "role", because the assign hooks for
those attempt to set the subsidiary "is_superuser" GUC, and that call
falls foul of the "not otherwise" prohibition. We can't switch to
using GUC_ACTION_SAVE for this, so instead add a new GUC variable
flag GUC_ALLOW_IN_PARALLEL to mark is_superuser as being safe to set
anyway. (This is okay because is_superuser has context PGC_INTERNAL
and thus only hard-wired calls can change it. We'd need more thought
before applying the flag to other GUCs; but maybe there are other
use-cases.) This isn't the prettiest fix perhaps, but other
alternatives we thought of would be much more invasive.
While here, correct a thinko in commit 059de3ca4: when rejecting
a GUC setting within a parallel worker, we should return 0 not -1
if the ereport doesn't longjmp. (This seems to have no consequences
right now because no caller cares, but it's inconsistent.) Improve
the comments to try to forestall future confusion of the same kind.
Despite the lack of field complaints, this seems worth back-patching.
Thanks to Nathan Bossart for the idea to invent a new flag,
and for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2833457.1723229039@sss.pgh.pa.us
To deparse a reference to a field of a RECORD-type output of a
subquery, EXPLAIN normally digs down into the subquery's plan to try
to discover exactly which anonymous RECORD type is meant. However,
this can fail if the subquery has been optimized out of the plan
altogether on the grounds that no rows could pass the WHERE quals,
which has been possible at least since 3fc6e2d7f. There isn't
anything remaining in the plan tree that would help us, so fall back
to printing the field name as "fN" for the N'th column of the record.
(This will actually be the right thing some of the time, since it
matches the column names we assign to RowExprs.)
In passing, fix a comment typo in create_projection_plan, which
I noticed while experimenting with an alternative fix for this.
Per bug #18576 from Vasya B. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Richard Guo and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18576-9feac34e132fea9e@postgresql.org
Trying to attach a table as a partition which is already on the
referenced side of a foreign key on the partitioned table that it is
being attached to, leads to strange behavior: we try to clone the
foreign key from the parent to the partition, but this new FK points to
the partition itself, and the mix of pg_constraint rows and triggers
doesn't behave well.
Rather than trying to untangle the mess (which might be possible given
sufficient time), I opted to forbid the ATTACH. This doesn't seem a
problematic restriction, given that we already fail to create the
foreign key if you do it the other way around, that is, having the
partition first and the FK second.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
When pg_dump retrieves the list of database objects and performs the
data dump, there was possibility that objects are replaced with others
of the same name, such as views, and access them. This vulnerability
could result in code execution with superuser privileges during the
pg_dump process.
This issue can arise when dumping data of sequences, foreign
tables (only 13 or later), or tables registered with a WHERE clause in
the extension configuration table.
To address this, pg_dump now utilizes the newly introduced
restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind GUC parameter to restrict the
accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during the dump
process. This new GUC parameter is added to back branches too, but
these changes do not require cluster recreation.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2024-7348
Backpatch-through: 12
This reverts commit 849326e49a.
Some buildfarm animals are failing with "cannot change
"client_encoding" during a parallel operation". It looks like
assign_client_encoding is unhappy at being asked to roll back a
client_encoding setting after a parallel worker encounters a
failure. There must be more to it though: why didn't I see this
during local testing? In any case, it's clear that moving the
RestoreGUCState() call is not as side-effect-free as I thought.
Given that the bug f5f30c22e intended to fix has gone unreported
for years, it's not something that's urgent to fix; I'm not
willing to risk messing with it further with only days to our
next release wrap.
Parallel workers failed after a sequence like
BEGIN;
CREATE USER foo;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION foo;
because check_session_authorization could not see the uncommitted
pg_authid row for "foo". This is because we ran RestoreGUCState()
in a separate transaction using an ordinary just-created snapshot.
The same disease afflicts any other GUC that requires catalog lookups
and isn't forgiving about the lookups failing.
To fix, postpone RestoreGUCState() into the worker's main transaction
after we've set up a snapshot duplicating the leader's. This affects
check_transaction_isolation and check_transaction_deferrable, which
think they should only run during transaction start. Make them
act like check_transaction_read_only, which already knows it should
silently accept the value when InitializingParallelWorker.
Per bug #18545 from Andrey Rachitskiy. Back-patch to all
supported branches, because this has been wrong for awhile.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18545-feba138862f19aaa@postgresql.org
01e2b7f0fd introduced a test which generated dead tuples for
vacuum with an UPDATE. The test only required enough dead TIDs for two
rounds of index vacuuming. This can be accomplished with a DELETE
instead of an UPDATE -- which generates about 50% less WAL and makes the
test 20% faster in many cases. The test takes several seconds (more on
slow buildfarm animals) because we need quite a few tuples to trigger
two rounds of index vacuuming; so it is worth a follow-on commit to
speed it up.
Suggested-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bWmMjmqL%2BOZ2duEQ80u7cRvpsExLNZNjzk-pXX5skwMQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, the first version containing this test.
pg_size_pretty(bigint) would return the value in bytes rather than PB
for the smallest-most bigint value. This happened due to an incorrect
assumption that the absolute value of -9223372036854775808 could be
stored inside a signed 64-bit type.
Here we fix that by instead storing that value in an unsigned 64-bit type.
This bug does exist in versions prior to 15 but the code there is
sufficiently different and the bug seems sufficiently non-critical that
it does not seem worth risking backpatching further.
Author: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHdTsMZPWEHUrZ=h3cky9Ccc3Mtx2whUHygY+ABP-mCmUw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
We don't allow inheritance parents as partitions, and have checks to
prevent this; but if a table _was_ in the past an inheritance parents
and all their children are removed, the pg_class.relhassubclass flag
may remain set, which confuses the partition pruning code (most
obviously, it results in an assertion failure; in production builds it
may be worse.)
Fix by resetting relhassubclass on attach.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18550-d5e047e9a897a889@postgresql.org
When provided an empty initial array, array_set_slice() fails to
check for overflow when computing the new array's dimensions.
While such overflows are ordinarily caught by ArrayGetNItems(),
commands with the following form are accepted:
INSERT INTO t (i[-2147483648:2147483647]) VALUES ('{}');
To fix, perform the hazardous computations using overflow-detecting
arithmetic routines. As with commit 18b585155a, the added test
cases generate errors that include a platform-dependent value, so
we again use psql's VERBOSITY parameter to suppress printing the
message text.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Joseph Koshakow
Reviewed-by: Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31ad2cd1-db94-bdb3-f91a-65ffdb4bef95%40gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
If a view has some updatable and some non-updatable columns, we failed
to verify updatability of any columns for which an INSERT or UPDATE
on the view explicitly specifies a DEFAULT item (unless the view has
a declared default for that column, which is rare anyway, and one
would almost certainly not write one for a non-updatable column).
This would lead to an unexpected "attribute number N not found in
view targetlist" error rather than the intended error.
Per bug #18546 from Alexander Lakhin. This bug is old, so back-patch
to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18546-84a292e759a9361d@postgresql.org
If vacuum fails to prune a tuple killed before OldestXmin, it will later
find that tuple dead in lazy_scan_prune() and loop infinitely.
Add a test reproducing this scenario to the recovery suite which creates
a table on a primary, updates the table to generate dead tuples for
vacuum, and then, during the vacuum, uses a replica to force
GlobalVisState->maybe_needed on the primary to move backwards and
precede the value of OldestXmin set at the beginning of vacuuming the
table.
This commit is separate from the fix in case there are test stability
issues.
Discussion of the bug: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_Y_NJzF4-8gzTTeaOuUL3CcGoXPjXcAHbTTygT8AyVqag%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion of the test: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_apNU2MPBK96V%2BbXjTq0RiZ-%3DA4ZTaysakpx9jxbq1dbQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan
checkWellFormedRecursion would issue "missing recursive reference"
if a WITH RECURSIVE query contained a single self-reference but
that self-reference was inside a top-level WITH, ORDER BY, LIMIT,
etc, rather than inside the second arm of the UNION as expected.
We already intended to throw more-on-point errors for such cases,
but those error checks must be done before examining the UNION arm
in order to have the desired results. So this patch need only
move some code (and improve the comments).
Per bug #18536 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18536-0a342ec07901203e@postgresql.org
ANALYZE sets relhassubclass=f when a partitioned table no longer has
partitions. An ANALYZE doing that proceeded to apply the inplace update
of pg_class.reltuples to the old pg_class tuple instead of the new
tuple, losing that reltuples=0 change if the ANALYZE committed.
Non-partitioning inheritance trees were unaffected. Back-patch to v14,
where commit 375aed36ad introduced
maintenance of partitioned table pg_class.reltuples.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a295b499-dcab-6a99-c06e-01cf60593344@gmail.com
When a partitioned table has an index that doesn't support a constraint,
but a partition has an equivalent index that does, then a DETACH
operation would misbehave: a crash in assertion-enabled systems (because
we fail to find the constraint in the parent that we expect to), or a
broken coninhcount value (-1) in production systems (because we blindly
believe that we've successfully detached the parent).
While we should reject an ATTACH of a partition with such an index, we
have failed to do so in existing releases, so adding an error in stable
releases might break the (unlikely) existing applications that rely on
this behavior. At this point I don't even want to reject them in
master, because it'd break pg_upgrade if such databases exist, and there
would be no easy way to fix existing databases without expensive index
rebuilds.
(Later on we could add ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT USING INDEX to
partitioned tables, which would allow the user to fix such patterns. At
that point we could add more restrictions to prevent the problem from
its root.)
Also, add a test case that leaves one table in this condition, so that
we can verify that pg_upgrade continues to work if we later decide to
change the policy on the master branch.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18500-62948b6fe5522f56@postgresql.org
This back-patches HEAD commits 066e8ac6e, 6082b3d5d, e7192486d,
and 896cd266f into supported branches. Changes:
* Use xmlAddChildList not xmlAddChild in XMLSERIALIZE
(affects v16 and up only). This was a flat-out coding mistake
that we got away with due to lax checking in previous versions
of xmlAddChild.
* Use xmlParseInNodeContext not xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory.
This is to dodge a bug in xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory in libxm2
releases 2.13.0-2.13.2. While that bug is now fixed upstream and
will probably never be seen in any production-oriented distro, it is
currently a problem on some more-bleeding-edge-friendly platforms.
* Suppress "chunk is not well balanced" errors from libxml2,
unless it is the only error. This eliminates an error-reporting
discrepancy between 2.13 and older releases. This error is
almost always redundant with previous errors, if not flat-out
inappropriate, which is why 2.13 changed the behavior and why
nobody's likely to miss it.
Erik Wienhold and Tom Lane, per report from Frank Streitzig.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/trinity-b0161630-d230-4598-9ebc-7a23acdb37cb-1720186432160@3c-app-gmx-bap25
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/trinity-361ba18b-541a-4fe7-bc63-655ae3a7d599-1720259822452@3c-app-gmx-bs01
If we choose ports in the range typically used for ephemeral ports there
is a danger of encountering a port conflict due to a race condition
between the time we choose the port in a range below that typically used
to allocate ephemeral ports, but higher than the range typically used by
well known services.
Author: Jelte Fenema-Nio, with some editing by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d6ee8761-39d1-0033-1afb-d5a57ee056f2@gmail.com
Backpatch to all live branches (12 and up)
Currently they are started in unix socket mode in ost cases, and then
converted to run in TCP mode. This can result in port collisions, and
there is no virtue in startng in unix socket mode, so start as we will
be going on.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d6ee8761-39d1-0033-1afb-d5a57ee056f2@gmail.com
Backpatch to all live branches (12 and up).
The numeric round() and trunc() functions clamp the scale argument to
the range between +/- NUMERIC_MAX_RESULT_SCALE (2000), which is much
smaller than the actual allowed range of type numeric. As a result,
they return incorrect results when asked to round/truncate more than
2000 digits before or after the decimal point.
Fix by using the correct upper and lower scale limits based on the
actual allowed (and documented) range of type numeric.
While at it, use the new NUMERIC_WEIGHT_MAX constant instead of
SHRT_MAX in all other overflow checks, and fix a comment thinko in
power_var() introduced by e54a758d24 -- the minimum value of
ln_dweight is -NUMERIC_DSCALE_MAX (-16383), not -SHRT_MAX, though this
doesn't affect the point being made in the comment, that the resulting
local_rscale value may exceed NUMERIC_MAX_DISPLAY_SCALE (1000).
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Joel Jacobson.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXB%2BrDTuMjhK5ZxcouufigSc-X4tGJCBTMpZ3n%3DxxQuhg%40mail.gmail.com
For an inner_unique join, we always assume that the executor will stop
scanning for matches after the first match. Therefore, for a mergejoin
that is inner_unique and whose mergeclauses are sufficient to identify a
match, we set the skip_mark_restore flag to true, indicating that the
executor need not do mark/restore calls. However, merge-right-anti-join
did not get this memo and continues scanning the inner side for matches
after the first match. If there are duplicates in the outer scan, we
may incorrectly skip matching some inner tuples, which can lead to wrong
results.
Here we fix this issue by ensuring that merge-right-anti-join also
advances to next outer tuple after the first match in inner_unique
cases. This also saves cycles by avoiding unnecessary scanning of inner
tuples after the first match.
Although hash-right-anti-join does not suffer from this wrong results
issue, we apply the same change to it as well, to help save cycles for
the same reason.
Per bug #18522 from Antti Lampinen, and bug #18526 from Feliphe Pozzer.
Back-patch to v16 where right-anti-join was introduced.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18522-c7a8956126afdfd0@postgresql.org
This covers both regular and inplace changes, since bugs arise at their
intersection. Where marked, these witness extant bugs. Back-patch to
v12 (all supported versions).
Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
We did not recover the subtransaction IDs of prepared transactions
when starting a hot standby from a shutdown checkpoint. As a result,
such subtransactions were considered as aborted, rather than
in-progress. That would lead to hint bits being set incorrectly, and
the subtransactions suddenly becoming visible to old snapshots when
the prepared transaction was committed.
To fix, update pg_subtrans with prepared transactions's subxids when
starting hot standby from a shutdown checkpoint. The snapshots taken
from that state need to be marked as "suboverflowed", so that we also
check the pg_subtrans.
Backport to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6b852e98-2d49-4ca1-9e95-db419a2696e0@iki.fi
This went unnoticed, because only a few existing callers of
BackgroundPsql->query used the result, and the ones that did were not
bothered by an extra newline. I noticed because I was about to add a
new test that checks the result.
Backport to all supported versions, since I just backported the
BackgroundPsql facility to all supported versions too.
Backport the new BackgroundPsql modules and the constructor functions,
background_psql() and interactive_psql, to all supported
branches. That makes it easier to backpatch tests that use it.
BackgroundPsql was introduced in version 16. On version 16, this
commit backports just the new timeout argument from master (commit
334f512f45). On older branches, the whole facility. This includes the
change to `use warnings FATAL => 'all'`, which we haven't otherwise
backported, but it seems good to keep the file identical across
branches.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b7c64f20-ea01-4f15-9088-0cd6832af149@iki.fi
afterTriggerInvokeEvents and AfterTriggerExecute have always
treated it as an error if the trigger OID mentioned in a queued
after-trigger event can't be found. However, that fails to
account for the edge case where the trigger's been dropped in
the current transaction since queueing the event. There seems
no very good reason to disallow that case, so instead silently
do nothing if the trigger OID can't be found.
This does give up a little bit of bug-detection ability, but I don't
recall that these error messages have ever actually revealed a bug,
so it seems mostly theoretical. Alternatives such as marking
pending events DONE at the time of dropping a trigger would be
complicated and perhaps introduce bugs of their own.
Per bug #18517 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18517-af2d19882240902c@postgresql.org
DeleteInitPrivs did not get the memo about how, when dropping a
whole object (with subid == 0), you should drop entries relating
to its sub-objects too. This is visible in the test_pg_dump test
case if one drops the extension at the end: the entry for
GRANT SELECT(col1) ON regress_pg_dump_table TO public;
was still present in pg_init_privs afterwards, although it was
pointing to a dangling table OID.
Noted while fooling with a fix for REASSIGN OWNED for pg_init_privs
entries. This bug is aboriginal in the pg_init_privs feature
though, and there seems no reason not to back-patch the fix.
The manual says clearly that punctuation in the input of
websearch_to_tsquery() is ignored, except for the special cases
of dashes and quotes. However, this failed for cases like
"(foo bar) or something", or in general an ISOPERATOR character
in front of the "or". We'd switch back to WAITOPERAND state,
then ignore the operator character while remaining in that state,
and then reach the "or" in WAITOPERAND state which (intentionally)
makes us treat it as data.
The fix is simple enough: if we see an ISOPERATOR character while in
WAITOPERATOR state, we have to skip it while staying in that state.
(We don't need to worry about other punctuation characters: those will
be consumed as though they were words, but then rejected by lexizing.)
In v14 and up (since commit eb086056f) we can simplify the code a bit
more too, because there is no longer a reason for the WAITOPERAND
state to distinguish between quoted and unquoted operands.
Per bug #18479 from Manos Emmanouilidis. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18479-d9b46e2fc242c33e@postgresql.org
infer_arbiter_indexes failed to renumber varnos in index expressions
or predicates that it got from the catalogs. This escaped detection
up to now because the stored varnos in such trees will be 1, and an
INSERT's result relation is usually the first rangetable entry,
so that that was fine. However, in cases such as inserting through
an updatable view, it's not fine, leading to failure to match the
expressions to the query with ensuing "there is no unique or exclusion
constraint matching the ON CONFLICT specification" errors.
Fix by copy-and-paste from get_relation_info().
Per bug #18502 from Michael Wang. Back-patch to all supported
versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18502-545b53f5b81e54e0@postgresql.org
test_predtest() neglected to consider the possibility that
SPI_plan_get_cached_plan would return NULL. This led to a core
dump if the input (incorrectly) contains more than one SQL
command.
While here, let's expend more than zero effort on the error
message for this case and nearby ones.
Per (half of) bug #18483 from Alexander Kozhemyakin.
Back-patch to all supported branches, not because this is
very significant (it's merely test scaffolding) but to make
our world a bit safer for fuzz testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18483-30bfff42de238000@postgresql.org
Before the v13-era commit 913bbd88d, check_sql_fn_retval fails to
resolve polymorphic output types and then just throws up its hands and
assumes the check will be made at runtime. I think that's true for
ordinary functions returning RECORD, but it doesn't happen in CALL,
potentially resulting in crashes if the actual output of the SQL
procedure's SELECT doesn't match the type inferred from polymorphism.
With a little bit of rearrangement, we can use get_call_result_type
instead of get_func_result_type and thereby infer the correct types.
I'm still unwilling to back-patch all of 913bbd88d, so if the types
don't match you'll get an error rather than perhaps silently inserting
a cast as v13 and later can. That's consistent with prior behavior
though, so it seems fine.
Prior to 70ffb27b2, you'd typically get other errors due to other
shortcomings of CALL's management of polymorphism. Nonetheless,
this is an independent bug.
Although there is no bug in v13 and up, it seems prudent to add
the test case for this to the newer branches too. It's clearly
an under-tested area.
Per report from Andrew Bille.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJnzarw9EeWHAQRm76dXd=7j+rgw6ERqC=nCay8jeFqTwKwhqQ@mail.gmail.com
Commit faff8f8e47 allowed integer literals to contain underscores, but
failed to update the lexer's "numericfail" rule. As a result, a
decimal integer literal containing underscores would fail to parse, if
used in an integer range with no whitespace after the first number,
such as "1_001..1_003" in a PL/pgSQL FOR loop.
Fix and backpatch to v16, where support for underscores in integer
literals was added.
Report and patch by Erik Wienhold.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/808ce947-46ec-4628-85fa-3dd600b2c154%40ewie.name
This test was failing when using wal_debug=on and -DWAL_DEBUG because of
additional log entries that made the test grab an LSN not mapping with
the error expected in the test.
Previously the test would look for the first matching line to get the
LSN to skip up to. This is improved by having the test scan the logs
with a regexp that checks for the expected ERROR string, ensuring that
the wanted LSN comes from the correct context.
Backpatch down to 15 where this test has been introduced.
Author: Ian Ilyasov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GV1P251MB100415F17E6B2FDD7188777ECDE32@GV1P251MB1004.EURP251.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit 3e1a373e2 missed teaching DecodeTimeOnly the same "ptype"
manipulations it added to DecodeDateTime. While likely harmless
at the time, it became a problem after 5b3c59535 added an error check
that ptype must be zero once we exit the parsing loop (that is, there
shouldn't be any unused prefixes). The consequence was that we'd
reject time or timetz input like T12:34:56 (the "extended" format
per ISO 8601-1:2019), even though that still worked in timestamp
input.
Since this is clearly under-tested code, add test cases covering all
the ISO 8601 time formats. (Note: although 8601 allows just "Thh",
we have never accepted that, and this patch doesn't change that.
I'm content to leave that as-is because it seems too likely to be
a mistake rather than intended input. If anyone wants to allow
that, it should be a separate patch anyway, and not back-patched.)
Per bug #18470 from David Perez. Back-patch to v16 where we
broke it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18470-34fad4c829106848@postgresql.org
transformTableLikeClause believed that it could process extended
statistics immediately because "the representation of CreateStatsStmt
doesn't depend on column numbers". That was true when extended stats
were first introduced, but it was falsified by the addition of
extended stats on expressions: the parsed expression tree is fed
forward by the LIKE option, and that will contain Vars. So if the
new table doesn't have attnums identical to the old one's (typically
because there are some dropped columns in the old one), that doesn't
work. The CREATE goes through, but it emits invalid statistics
objects that will cause problems later.
Fortunately, we already have logic that can adapt expression trees
to the possibly-new column numbering. To use it, we have to delay
processing of CREATE_TABLE_LIKE_STATISTICS into expandTableLikeClause,
just as for other LIKE options that involve expressions.
Per bug #18468 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v14 where
extended statistics on expressions were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18468-f5add190e3fa5902@postgresql.org
We are capable of optimizing MIN() and MAX() aggregates on indexed
columns into subqueries that exploit the index, rather than the normal
thing of scanning the whole table. When we do this, we replace the
Aggref node(s) with Params referencing subquery outputs. Such Params
really ought to be included in the per-plan-node extParam/allParam
sets computed by SS_finalize_plan. However, we've never done so
up to now because of an ancient implementation choice to perform
that substitution during set_plan_references, which runs after
SS_finalize_plan, so that SS_finalize_plan never sees these Params.
The cleanest fix would be to perform a separate tree walk to do
these substitutions before SS_finalize_plan runs. That seems
unattractive, first because a whole-tree mutation pass is expensive,
and second because we lack infrastructure for visiting expression
subtrees in a Plan tree, so that we'd need a new function knowing
as much as SS_finalize_plan knows about that. I also considered
swapping the order of SS_finalize_plan and set_plan_references,
but that fell foul of various assumptions that seem tricky to fix.
So the approach adopted here is to teach SS_finalize_plan itself
to check for such Aggrefs. I refactored things a bit in setrefs.c
to avoid having three copies of the code that does that.
Back-patch of v17 commits d0d44049d and 779ac2c74. When d0d44049d
went in, there was no evidence that it was fixing a reachable bug,
so I refrained from back-patching. Now we have such evidence.
Per bug #18465 from Hal Takahara. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18465-2fae927718976b22@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2391880.1689025003@sss.pgh.pa.us
Underscores were added to numeric literals in faff8f8e47. This change
also affected the positional parameters (e.g., $1) rule, which uses
the same production for its digits. But this did not actually work,
because the digits for parameters are processed using atol(), which
does not handle underscores and ignores whatever it cannot parse.
The underscores notation is probably not useful for positional
parameters, so for simplicity revert that rule to its old form that
only accepts digits 0-9.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5d216d1c-91f6-4cbe-95e2-b4cbd930520c%40ewie.name
Most of the infrastructure for procedure arguments was already
okay with polymorphic output arguments, but it turns out that
CallStmtResultDesc() was a few bricks shy of a load here. It thought
all it needed to do was call build_function_result_tupdesc_t, but
that function specifically disclaims responsibility for resolving
polymorphic arguments. Failing to handle that doesn't seem to be
a problem for CALL in plpgsql, but CALL from plain SQL would get
errors like "cannot display a value of type anyelement", or even
crash outright.
In v14 and later we can simply examine the exposed types of the
CallStmt.outargs nodes to get the right type OIDs. But it's a lot
more complicated to fix in v12/v13, because those versions don't
have CallStmt.outargs, nor do they do expand_function_arguments
until ExecuteCallStmt runs. We have to duplicatively run
expand_function_arguments, and then re-determine which elements
of the args list are output arguments.
Per bug #18463 from Drew Kimball. Back-patch to all supported
versions, since it's busted in all of them.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18463-f8cd77e12564d8a2@postgresql.org
Presently, when this function is called for an unlogged sequence on
a standby server, it will error out with a message like
ERROR: could not open file "base/5/16388": No such file or directory
Since the pg_sequences system view uses pg_sequence_last_value(),
it can error similarly. To fix, modify the function to return NULL
for unlogged sequences on standby servers. Since this bug is
present on all versions since v15, this approach is preferable to
making the ERROR nicer because we need to repair the pg_sequences
view without modifying its definition on released versions. For
consistency, this commit also modifies the function to return NULL
for other sessions' temporary sequences. The pg_sequences view
already appropriately filters out such sequences, so there's no bug
there, but we might as well offer some defense in case someone
invokes this function directly.
Unlogged sequences were first introduced in v15, but temporary
sequences are much older, so while the fix for unlogged sequences
is only back-patched to v15, the temporary sequence portion is
back-patched to all supported versions.
We could also remove the privilege check in the pg_sequences view
definition in v18 if we modify this function to return NULL for
sequences for which the current user lacks privileges, but that is
left as a future exercise for when v18 development begins.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240501005730.GA594666%40nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 12
The catalog view pg_stats_ext fails to consider privileges for
expression statistics. The catalog view pg_stats_ext_exprs fails
to consider privileges and row-level security policies. To fix,
restrict the data in these views to table owners or roles that
inherit privileges of the table owner. It may be possible to apply
less restrictive privilege checks in some cases, but that is left
as a future exercise. Furthermore, for pg_stats_ext_exprs, do not
return data for tables with row-level security enabled, as is
already done for pg_stats_ext.
On the back-branches, a fix-CVE-2024-4317.sql script is provided
that will install into the "share" directory. This file can be
used to apply the fix to existing clusters.
Bumps catversion on 'master' branch only.
Reported-by: Lukas Fittl
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch, Tomas Vondra, Tom Lane
Security: CVE-2024-4317
Backpatch-through: 14
94985c210 added code to detect when WindowFuncs were monotonic and
allowed additional quals to be "pushed down" into the subquery to be
used as WindowClause runConditions in order to short-circuit execution
in nodeWindowAgg.c.
The Node representation of runConditions wasn't well selected and
because we do qual pushdown before planning the subquery, the planning
of the subquery could perform subquery pull-up of nested subqueries.
For WindowFuncs with args, the arguments could be changed after pushing
the qual down to the subquery.
This was made more difficult by the fact that the code duplicated the
WindowFunc inside an OpExpr to include in the WindowClauses runCondition
field. This could result in duplication of subqueries and a pull-up of
such a subquery could result in another initplan parameter being issued
for the 2nd version of the subplan. This could result in errors such as:
ERROR: WindowFunc not found in subplan target lists
Here in the backbranches, we don't have the flexibility to improve the
Node representation to resolve this, so instead we just disable the
runCondition optimization for ntile() unless the argument is a Const,
(v16 only) and likewise for count(expr) (both v15 and v16). count(*) is
unaffected. All other window functions which support this optimization
all take zero arguments and therefore are unaffected.
Bug: #18170
Reported-by: Zuming Jiang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18170-f1d17bf9a0d58b24@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through 15 (master will be fixed independently)
As an optimization, we store "name" columns as cstrings in btree
indexes.
Here we modify it so that Index Only Scans convert these cstrings back
to names with NAMEDATALEN bytes rather than storing the cstring in the
tuple slot, as was happening previously.
Bug: #17855
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17855-5f523e0f9769a566@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12, all supported versions
In commit 25cd2d640 I (tgl) opined that "The additions of the months
and microseconds fields could also overflow, of course. However,
I believe we need no additional checks there; the existing range
checks should catch such cases". This is demonstrably wrong however
for the microseconds field, and given that discovery it seems prudent
to be paranoid about the months addition as well.
Report and patch by Joseph Koshakow. As before, back-patch to all
supported branches. (However, the test case doesn't work before
v15 because we didn't allow wider-than-int32 numbers in interval
literals. A variant test could probably be built that fits within
that restriction, but it didn't seem worth the trouble.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHf77sRHKoEzUw9_cMYSpbpNS2C+J_+8Dq4+0oi8iKopeA@mail.gmail.com
Commit 2ed8f9a01 intended to institute a policy that if a
RangeTblFunction has a coldeflist, then the function return type is
certainly RECORD, and we should use the coldeflist as the source of
truth about what the columns of the record type are. When the
original function has been folded to a constant, inspection of the
constant might give a different answer. This situation will lead to
a tuple-type-mismatch error at execution, but up until that point we
need to consistently believe the coldeflist, or we'll have problems
from different bits of code reaching different conclusions.
expandRTE didn't get that memo though, and would try to produce a
tupdesc based on the constant in this situation, leading to an
assertion failure. (Desultory testing suggests that non-assert
builds often manage to give the expected error, although I also
saw a "cache lookup failed for type 0" error, and it seems at
least possible that a crash could happen.)
Some other callers of get_expr_result_type and get_expr_result_tupdesc
were also being incautious about this. While none of them seem to
have actual bugs, they're working harder than necessary in this case,
besides which it seems safest to have an explicit policy of not using
those functions on an RTE with a coldeflist. Adjust the code
accordingly, and add commentary to funcapi.c about this policy.
Also fix an obsolete comment that claimed "get_expr_result_type()
doesn't know how to extract type info from a RECORD constant".
That hasn't been true since commit d57534740.
Per bug #18422 from Alexander Lakhin.
As with the previous commit, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18422-89ca86c8eac5246d@postgresql.org
GetPageWithFreeSpace() callers assume the returned block exists in the
main fork, failing with "could not read block" errors if that doesn't
hold. Make that assumption reliable now. It hadn't been guaranteed,
due to the weak WAL and data ordering of participating components. Most
operations on the fsm fork are not WAL-logged. Relation extension is
not WAL-logged. Hence, an fsm-fork block on disk can reference a
main-fork block that no WAL record has initialized. That could happen
after an OS crash, a replica promote, or a PITR restore. wal_log_hints
makes the trouble easier to hit; a replica promote or PITR ending just
after a relevant fsm-fork FPI_FOR_HINT may yield this broken state. The
v16 RelationAddBlocks() mechanism also makes the trouble easier to hit,
since it bulk-extends even without extension lock waiters. Commit
917dc7d239 stopped trouble around
truncation, but vectors involving PageIsNew() pages remained.
This implementation adds a RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() call when the
cached relation size doesn't confirm a block exists. We've been unable
to identify a benchmark that slows materially, but this may show up as
additional time in lseek(). An alternative without that overhead would
be a new ReadBufferMode such that ReadBufferExtended() returns NULL
after a 0-byte read, with all other errors handled normally. However,
each GetFreeIndexPage() caller would then need code for the return-NULL
case. Back-patch to v14, due to earlier versions not caching relation
size and the absence of a pre-v16 problem report.
Ronan Dunklau. Reported by Ronan Dunklau.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1878547.tdWV9SEqCh%40aivenlaptop
Up to now, read_sql_construct() has collected all the source text from
the statement or expression's initial token up to the character just
before the "until" token. It normally tries to strip trailing
whitespace from that, largely for neatness. If there was a "-- text"
comment after the expression, this resulted in removing the newline
that terminates the comment, which creates a hazard if we try to paste
the collected text into a larger SQL construct without inserting a
newline after it. In particular this caused our handling of CASE
constructs to fail if there's a comment after a WHEN expression.
Commit 4adead1d2 noticed a similar problem with cursor arguments,
and worked around it through the rather crude hack of suppressing
the whitespace-trimming behavior for those. Rather than do that
and leave the hazard open for future hackers to trip over, let's
fix it properly. pl_scanner.c already has enough infrastructure
to report the end location of the expression's last token, so
we can copy up to that location and never collect any trailing
whitespace or comment to begin with.
Erik Wienhold and Tom Lane, per report from Michal Bartak.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAVzF_FjRoi8fOVuLCZhQJx6HATQ7MKm=aFOHWZODFnLmjX-xA@mail.gmail.com
