I believe this is not a violation of our policy against requiring initdb
for minor-version bugfixes, since users don't *have* to initdb; they
just won't see any effect from the fix if they don't. But a user who
does do a clean install or initdb upgrade to 6.5.2 will get the fix,
and that seems worthwhile.
been applied. The patches are in the .tar.gz attachment at the end:
varchar-array.patch this patch adds support for arrays of bpchar() and
varchar(), which where always missing from postgres.
These datatypes can be used to replace the _char4,
_char8, etc., which were dropped some time ago.
block-size.patch this patch fixes many errors in the parser and other
program which happen with very large query statements
(> 8K) when using a page size larger than 8192.
This patch is needed if you want to submit queries
larger than 8K. Postgres supports tuples up to 32K
but you can't insert them because you can't submit
queries larger than 8K. My patch fixes this problem.
The patch also replaces all the occurrences of `8192'
and `1<<13' in the sources with the proper constants
defined in include files. You should now never find
8192 hardwired in C code, just to make code clearer.
--
Massimo Dal Zotto
hashjoin's hashFunc() so that it does the right thing with pass-by-value
data types (the old code would always return 0 for int2 or char values,
which would work but would slow things down a lot). Extend opr_sanity
regress test to catch more kinds of errors.
function is found in prosrc field of pg_proc, not proname. This allows
multiple aliases of a built-in to all be implemented as direct builtins,
without needing a level of indirection through an SQL function. Replace
existing SQL alias functions with builtin entries accordingly.
Save a few K by not storing string names of builtin functions in fmgr's
internal table (if you really want 'em, get 'em from pg_proc...).
Update opr_sanity with a few more cross-checks.
I would like some feedback on what the hash function for the int8 hash
function
in the ./backend/access/hash/hashfunc.c should return.
Also, could someone (maybe Tomas Lockhart?) look-over the patch and make
sure
the system table entries are correct? I've tried to research them as
much as I
could, but some of them are still not clear to me.
Thanks,
-Ryan
and pg_operator. The lone error in pg_operator was reported as a bug
by Michael Reifenberger; the multiple errors in pg_proc would only have
been noticed if one invoked the functions by name rather than using
operator syntax. I guess few people do that.
a field was labelled as a primary key, the system automatically
created a unique index on the field. This patch extends it so
that the index has the indisprimary field set. You can pull a list
of primary keys with the followiing select.
SELECT pg_class.relname, pg_attribute.attname
FROM pg_class, pg_attribute, pg_index
WHERE pg_class.oid = pg_attribute.attrelid AND
pg_class.oid = pg_index.indrelid AND
pg_index.indkey[0] = pg_attribute.attnum AND
pg_index.indisunique = 't';
There is nothing in this patch that modifies the template database to
set the indisprimary attribute for system tables. Should they be
changed or should we only be concerned with user tables?
D'Arcy
Fix one usage of substr() which mapped to the "Oracle compatibility" funcs
rather than the more recent (and closer to SQL92) function in varlena.c.
Add more DESC() entries for conversion functions.
oprlsortop and oprrsortop links. There's still a bug involving
conflicting definitions for point @ path, but I'm not taking
responsibility for deciding which one is right...
