postgresql/src/include/commands/tablecmds.h

95 lines
3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* tablecmds.h
* prototypes for tablecmds.c.
*
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2018, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
2010-09-20 16:08:53 -04:00
* src/include/commands/tablecmds.h
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef TABLECMDS_H
#define TABLECMDS_H
#include "access/htup.h"
#include "catalog/dependency.h"
#include "catalog/objectaddress.h"
#include "nodes/parsenodes.h"
#include "catalog/partition.h"
#include "storage/lock.h"
#include "utils/relcache.h"
extern ObjectAddress DefineRelation(CreateStmt *stmt, char relkind, Oid ownerId,
Implement table partitioning. Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences. The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed. Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries. Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an expression. Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible. Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova, Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
2016-12-07 13:17:43 -05:00
ObjectAddress *typaddress, const char *queryString);
extern void RemoveRelations(DropStmt *drop);
extern Oid AlterTableLookupRelation(AlterTableStmt *stmt, LOCKMODE lockmode);
extern void AlterTable(Oid relid, LOCKMODE lockmode, AlterTableStmt *stmt);
extern LOCKMODE AlterTableGetLockLevel(List *cmds);
extern void ATExecChangeOwner(Oid relationOid, Oid newOwnerId, bool recursing, LOCKMODE lockmode);
extern void AlterTableInternal(Oid relid, List *cmds, bool recurse);
extern Oid AlterTableMoveAll(AlterTableMoveAllStmt *stmt);
extern ObjectAddress AlterTableNamespace(AlterObjectSchemaStmt *stmt,
Oid *oldschema);
extern void AlterTableNamespaceInternal(Relation rel, Oid oldNspOid,
Oid nspOid, ObjectAddresses *objsMoved);
extern void AlterRelationNamespaceInternal(Relation classRel, Oid relOid,
2005-10-14 22:49:52 -04:00
Oid oldNspOid, Oid newNspOid,
bool hasDependEntry,
ObjectAddresses *objsMoved);
extern void CheckTableNotInUse(Relation rel, const char *stmt);
extern void ExecuteTruncate(TruncateStmt *stmt);
extern void SetRelationHasSubclass(Oid relationId, bool relhassubclass);
extern ObjectAddress renameatt(RenameStmt *stmt);
extern ObjectAddress renameatt_type(RenameStmt *stmt);
extern ObjectAddress RenameConstraint(RenameStmt *stmt);
extern ObjectAddress RenameRelation(RenameStmt *stmt);
extern void RenameRelationInternal(Oid myrelid,
const char *newrelname, bool is_internal);
extern void find_composite_type_dependencies(Oid typeOid,
Relation origRelation,
const char *origTypeName);
extern void check_of_type(HeapTuple typetuple);
extern void register_on_commit_action(Oid relid, OnCommitAction action);
extern void remove_on_commit_action(Oid relid);
extern void PreCommit_on_commit_actions(void);
extern void AtEOXact_on_commit_actions(bool isCommit);
extern void AtEOSubXact_on_commit_actions(bool isCommit,
2005-10-14 22:49:52 -04:00
SubTransactionId mySubid,
SubTransactionId parentSubid);
extern void RangeVarCallbackOwnsTable(const RangeVar *relation,
Oid relId, Oid oldRelId, void *arg);
extern void RangeVarCallbackOwnsRelation(const RangeVar *relation,
Oid relId, Oid oldRelId, void *noCatalogs);
extern bool PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint(Relation scanrel,
List *partConstraint);
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 15:18:54 -04:00
#endif /* TABLECMDS_H */