From ab931303561da5244ba21f0f8fbe4a9ec837160d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 18:32:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Doc: fix release-note typo. This mention of memcpy() should of course have said memcmp(). Reported-by: chris@chrullrich.net Author: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/177883653690.764749.14038057906859461991@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 14 --- doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml index 9bad665531e..207d42713c6 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ Branch: REL_14_STABLE [b282280e9] 2026-05-11 05:13:51 -0700 Use timingsafe_bcmp() instead - of memcpy() or strcmp() + of memcmp() or strcmp() when checking passwords, hashes, etc. It is not known whether the data dependency of those functions is usefully exploitable in any of these places, but in the interests of safety, replace them.