From 2a975b991e44ec6b3ac39612869176fdbd3c0db2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 18:32:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Doc: fix release-note typo. This mention of memcpy() should of course have said memcmp(). Reported-by: chris@chrullrich.net Author: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/177883653690.764749.14038057906859461991@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 14 --- doc/src/sgml/release-15.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-15.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-15.sgml index 3e8b4dc39c4..4975d446337 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-15.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-15.sgml @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ Branch: REL_14_STABLE [b282280e9] 2026-05-11 05:13:51 -0700 Use timingsafe_bcmp() instead - of memcpy() or strcmp() + of memcmp() or strcmp() when checking passwords, hashes, etc. It is not known whether the data dependency of those functions is usefully exploitable in any of these places, but in the interests of safety, replace them.