Just like bin/ and sbin/, I think setting WARNS to the highest value
possible will make it more attractive for people to fix warnings.
- The WARNS variable is set in the Makefile in the directory of the
application itself, making it more likely that it will be removed out
of curiosity to see what happens.
- New applications will most likely build with WARNS=6 out of the box,
because the author would more likely fix the warnings during
development than lower WARNS.
Unfortunately almost all apps in libexec require a lowered value of
WARNS.
1. separating L2 tables (ARP, NDP) from the L3 routing tables
2. removing as much locking dependencies among these layers as
possible to allow for some parallelism in the search operations
3. simplify the logic in the routing code,
The most notable end result is the obsolescent of the route
cloning (RTF_CLONING) concept, which translated into code reduction
in both IPv4 ARP and IPv6 NDP related modules, and size reduction in
struct rtentry{}. The change in design obsoletes the semantics of
RTF_CLONING, RTF_WASCLONE and RTF_LLINFO routing flags. The userland
applications such as "arp" and "ndp" have been modified to reflect
those changes. The output from "netstat -r" shows only the routing
entries.
Quite a few developers have contributed to this project in the
past: Glebius Smirnoff, Luigi Rizzo, Alessandro Cerri, and
Andre Oppermann. And most recently:
- Kip Macy revised the locking code completely, thus completing
the last piece of the puzzle, Kip has also been conducting
active functional testing
- Sam Leffler has helped me improving/refactoring the code, and
provided valuable reviews
- Julian Elischer setup the perforce tree for me and has helped
me maintaining that branch before the svn conversion
POSIX. This also makes the struct correct we ever implement an i386-time64
architecture. Not that we need too.
Reviewed by: imp, brooks
Approved by: njl (acpica), des (no objects, touches procfs)
Tested with: make universe
While I'm here, sync the usage() synopsis with the manual page synopsis:
make the [-i | -s] explicit and sort the options alphabetically.
Reminded by: ru
MFC after: 3 days
ever since rev. 1.1 of bootpd.c.
While I'm here, rearrange the synopsis a bit: sort the options and
clarify that -i and -s are mutually exclusive.
Reported by: Atanas Buchvarov <nasko@nove.bg>
MFC after: 3 days
refers to the size of the whole ethernet packet, just the DHCP
message within the UDP payload, or something else. bootpd interpreted
it as a maximum UDP payload size, so it could end up sending
fragmented packets to clients (such as some versions of Etherboot)
that used different interpretations of the maximum message size.
Switch to the most conservative interpretation: ensure that the
ethernet packet containing the response is no larger than the
specified maximum message size. This matches the behaviour of
the ISC dhcpd.
MFC after: 1 week
bptypes.h originally defined int32 to be of type long. This obviously
doesn't work on the Alpha. By defining int32 (and u_int32) in terms of
int32_t (and u_int32_t) it now is what it says it should be.
Two occurrences of 'unsigned int32' have been changed to 'u_int32' for
consistency.
Submitted by: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>
o main returns int not void
o use return 0 at end of main when needed
o use braces to avoid potentially ambiguous else
o don't default to type int (and also remove a useless register
modifier).
Reviewed by: obrien and chuckr
friends are terminated and allow for a maximum
host name length of MAXHOSTNAMELEN - 1.
Put parenthesis around sizeof args.
Make some variables static.
Fix telnetd -u (broken by my last commit)
Prompted by: bde
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
do it themselves. (Some of these programs actually depended on this
beyond compiling the definition of struct ifinfo!) Also fix up some
other #include messes while we're at it.
I know that many of these entries are bogus and need to be revisited,
but let's get the tree working again for now and then do a pass through
looking at all the __FreeBSD__ entries, shall we?
