s/BIT_NAND/BIT_ANDNOT/, and for CPU and DOMAINSET too. The actual
implementation is "and not" (or "but not"), i.e. A but not B.
Fortunately this does appear to be what all existing callers want.
Don't supply a NAND (not (A and B)) operation at this time.
Discussed with: jeff
Reviewed by: cem
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22791
The benefit of BIT_FLS() is that ffsl() can be implemented with a
count leading zeros instruction which is more widespread available.
Submitted by: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
MFC after: 1 week