The version that ended upstream was ultimately slightly different than the
version committed here; notably, statvfs() is used but it's redefined
appropriately to statfs() on FreeBSD since we don't provide the fstypename
for the former interface.
The revokex test does not work when the scratch directory is created on NFS.
Given the nature of NFS, it likely can never work without looking like a
security hole since O_SEARCH would rely on the server knowing that the
directory did have +x at the time of open and that it's OK for it to have
been revoked based on POSIX specification for O_SEARCH.
This does mean that O_SEARCH is only partially functional on NFS in general,
but I suspect the execute bit getting revoked in the process is likely not
common.
Reviewed by: kib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23573
The RCSID data was wrong, so this is effectively a record-only merge
with correction of said data. No further changes should be needed in this
area, as we've now upstreamed our local changes to this specific test.
In FreeBSD's O_SEARCH implementation, O_SEARCH in conjunction with O_RDWR or
O_WRONLY is explicitly rejected. In this case, O_RDWR was not necessary
anyways as the file will get created with or without it.
This was submitted upstream as misc/54940 and committed in rev 1.8 of the
file.
Coverity correctly reports this as a resource leak. It's an admittedly minor
one, but plug it anyways.
This has been submitted upstream as misc/54939.
CID: 978288
O_SEARCH is defined by POSIX [0] to open a directory for searching, skipping
permissions checks on the directory itself after the initial open(). This is
close to the semantics we've historically applied for O_EXEC on a directory,
which is UB according to POSIX. Conveniently, O_SEARCH on a file is also
explicitly undefined behavior according to POSIX, so O_EXEC would be a fine
choice. The spec goes on to state that O_SEARCH and O_EXEC need not be
distinct values, but they're not defined to be the same value.
This was pointed out as an incompatibility with other systems that had made
its way into libarchive, which had assumed that O_EXEC was an alias for
O_SEARCH.
This defines compatibility O_SEARCH/FSEARCH (equivalent to O_EXEC and FEXEC
respectively) and expands our UB for O_EXEC on a directory. O_EXEC on a
directory is checked in vn_open_vnode already, so for completeness we add a
NOEXECCHECK when O_SEARCH has been specified on the top-level fd and do not
re-check that when descending in namei.
[0] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
Reviewed by: kib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23247
The current code clearly intended for these to be octal based on the values
used, but the octal prefix was forgotten. Add it now for correctness, but
note that we don't currently execute these tests.
This has been submitted upstream as misc/54902, so I've omitted the standard
FreeBSD markers that we tend to put into netbsd-tests for upstream-candidate
identification.
Reviewed by: ngie
MFC after: 3 days
This also (inadvertently) contains an update to
contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc/sys/t_wait.c (new testcases).
MFC after: 2 weeks
In collaboration with: christos@NetBSD.org
Some files lack required #include <sys/stat.h>. The #ifdef is per ngie's
request; the includes are clearly necessary for struct stat.
The faccessat test fails because it tries to use AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW with
faccessat(), which is not specified by POSIX.1-2008.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1411
Reviewed by: ngie
minus the vendor Makefiles
Provide directions for how to bootstrap the vendor sources in
FREEBSD-upgrade
MFC after 2 weeks
Discussed with: rpaulo
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
