even could call VOP_REVOKE() on vnodes associated with its dev_t's
has originated, but it stops right here.
If there are things people belive destroy_dev() needs to learn how to
do, please tell me about it, preferably with a reproducible test case.
Include <sys/uio.h> in bluetooth code rather than rely on <sys/vnode.h>
to do so.
The fact that some of the USB code needs to include <sys/vnode.h>
still disturbs me greatly, but I do not have time to chase that.
branches:
Initialize struct cdevsw using C99 sparse initializtion and remove
all initializations to default values.
This patch is automatically generated and has been tested by compiling
LINT with all the fields in struct cdevsw in reverse order on alpha,
sparc64 and i386.
Approved by: re(scottl)
debugging levels to off by default. Now that debug levels can be
tweaked by sysctl we don't need to go through hoops to get the
different usb parts to produce debug data.
Original NetBSD log messages are:
----------------------------
revision 1.23
date: 2001/12/12 15:48:18; author: augustss; lines: +132 -114
Add a scanner quirk for keeping the pipes open between device opening.
Idea from Enami.
----------------------------
revision 1.22
date: 2001/12/03 01:47:13; author: augustss; lines: +8 -16
Handle vendor/product lookup with a common routine.
----------------------------
revision 1.21
date: 2001/12/01 09:42:39; author: enami; lines: +4 -4
Shorten wmesg so that they can be distinguished in ps/top output.
----------------------------
revision 1.12
date: 2001/01/23 14:04:14; author: augustss; lines: +7 -1
Make sure driver attach/detach events are generated in a
consistent manner.
----------------------------
PR:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Approved by:
Obtained from:
MFC after:
Note ALL MODULES MUST BE RECOMPILED
make the kernel aware that there are smaller units of scheduling than the
process. (but only allow one thread per process at this time).
This is functionally equivalent to teh previousl -current except
that there is a thread associated with each process.
Sorry john! (your next MFC will be a doosie!)
Reviewed by: peter@freebsd.org, dillon@freebsd.org
X-MFC after: ha ha ha ha
