From 9ec89d355f7becc682cf9fc4e23571be7a200036 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:14:16 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Remove completely bogus alignment check -- it's the physical
 address that needs to be aligned, not the virtual, and it doesn't seem worth
 the cost of a vtophys() call just to see if kmem_alloc_contig() works
 properly.

---
 sys/arm/arm/busdma_machdep-v6.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/arm/arm/busdma_machdep-v6.c b/sys/arm/arm/busdma_machdep-v6.c
index f45a5d1e03a..608c650f594 100644
--- a/sys/arm/arm/busdma_machdep-v6.c
+++ b/sys/arm/arm/busdma_machdep-v6.c
@@ -721,8 +721,6 @@ bus_dmamem_alloc(bus_dma_tag_t dmat, void** vaddr, int flags,
 		free(*mapp, M_DEVBUF);
 		*mapp = NULL;
 		return (ENOMEM);
-	} else if ((uintptr_t)*vaddr & (dmat->alignment - 1)) {
-		printf("bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly.\n");
 	}
 	dmat->map_count++;