Bug fix to UFS/FFS superblock integrity checks when reading a superblock.

The original check verified that if an alternate superblock has not
been selected that the superblock is located in its standard location.
For UFS1 the with a 65536 block size, the first backup superblock
is at the same location as the UFS2 superblock. Since SBLOCK_UFS2
is the first location checked, the first backup is the superblock
that will be used for a UFS1 filesystems with a 65536 block size.
This patch allows the use of the first backup superblock in that
situation.

Reported by: Peter Holm
Tested by:   Peter Holm
MFC after:   1 month (with 076002f24d)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35219
This commit is contained in:
Kirk McKusick 2022-07-06 14:31:00 -07:00
parent f3f5368dfb
commit 9e1f44d044

View file

@ -348,9 +348,21 @@ validate_sblock(struct fs *fs, int isaltsblk)
%jd);
} else if (fs->fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) {
if (!isaltsblk) {
CHK(fs->fs_sblockloc, >, SBLOCK_UFS1, %#jx);
CHK2(fs->fs_sblockactualloc, !=, SBLOCK_UFS1,
fs->fs_sblockactualloc, !=, 0, %jd);
CHK(fs->fs_sblockloc, >, SBLOCK_UFS1, %jd);
/*
* For UFS1 the with a 65536 block size, the first
* backup superblock is at the same location as the
* UFS2 superblock. Since SBLOCK_UFS2 is the first
* location checked, the first backup is the
* superblock that will be accessed.
*/
if (fs->fs_bsize == SBLOCK_UFS2) {
CHK(fs->fs_sblockactualloc, >, SBLOCK_UFS2,
%jd);
} else {
CHK2(fs->fs_sblockactualloc, !=, SBLOCK_UFS1,
fs->fs_sblockactualloc, !=, 0, %jd);
}
}
CHK(fs->fs_nindir, !=, fs->fs_bsize / sizeof(ufs1_daddr_t),
%jd);
@ -382,7 +394,6 @@ validate_sblock(struct fs *fs, int isaltsblk)
CHK(fs->fs_bsize, >, MAXBSIZE, %jd);
CHK(fs->fs_bsize, <, roundup(sizeof(struct fs), DEV_BSIZE), %jd);
CHK(fs->fs_sbsize, >, SBLOCKSIZE, %jd);
CHK(fs->fs_sbsize, <, fs->fs_fsize, %jd);
CHK(powerof2(fs->fs_bsize), ==, 0, %jd);
CHK(fs->fs_fsize, <, sectorsize, %jd);
CHK(fs->fs_fsize, >, fs->fs_bsize, %jd);