From 974efbb3d5c0a21062e67cd72b6685acaaf17fdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Harmening" Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:14:11 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] unionfs: fix typo in comment I deleted the wrong word when writing up a comment in a prior change; the covered vnode may be recursed during any unmount, not just forced unmount. --- sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c b/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c index 466c88c705f..08202501fe0 100644 --- a/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c +++ b/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ unionfs_noderem(struct vnode *vp) int writerefs; /* - * The root vnode lock may be recursed during forcible, because + * The root vnode lock may be recursed during unmount, because * it may share the same lock as the unionfs mount's covered vnode, * which is locked across VFS_UNMOUNT(). This lock will then be * recursively taken during the vflush() issued by unionfs_unmount().