From 799cf446be2ca0ece3c501f23e47f0b646c5d569 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:13:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Clarify to explain that C99 conforming compilers don't need
 CMPLX*().

Discussed with: kargl@
---
 lib/msun/src/math_private.h | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/msun/src/math_private.h b/lib/msun/src/math_private.h
index 083197e1b94..afaf201ae03 100644
--- a/lib/msun/src/math_private.h
+++ b/lib/msun/src/math_private.h
@@ -456,9 +456,8 @@ typedef union {
  * to -0.0+I*0.0.
  *
  * The C11 standard introduced the macros CMPLX(), CMPLXF() and CMPLXL()
- * to construct complex values. The functions below are modelled after
- * these macros, with the exception that they cannot be used to
- * construct compile-time complex values.
+ * to construct complex values.  Compilers that conform to the C99
+ * standard require the following functions to avoid the above issues.
  */
 
 #ifndef CMPLXF