From 5d5ca6d75e2f83055e723d2269dc0ca9934dfa88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 03:38:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix some misunderstandings about 64 bit extension. Fix
 fuword/suword - they're supposed to be 'long' - ie: point them at
 fuword64/suword64 instead of the incorrect 32 bit versions.

---
 sys/amd64/amd64/support.S | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/amd64/amd64/support.S b/sys/amd64/amd64/support.S
index 94b5229daa8..2f1f34664ff 100644
--- a/sys/amd64/amd64/support.S
+++ b/sys/amd64/amd64/support.S
@@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ ENTRY(fuword64)
 	movq	$0,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
 	ret
 
+ENTRY(fuword)
+	jmp	fuword64
+
 ENTRY(fuword32)
 	movq	PCPU(CURPCB),%rcx
 	movq	$fusufault,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
@@ -366,15 +369,10 @@ ENTRY(fuword32)
 	cmpq	%rax,%rdi			/* verify address is valid */
 	ja	fusufault
 
-/* XXX use the 64 extend */
-	xorq	%rax, %rax
 	movl	(%rdi),%eax
 	movq	$0,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
 	ret
 
-ENTRY(fuword)
-	jmp	fuword32
-
 /*
  * These two routines are called from the profiling code, potentially
  * at interrupt time. If they fail, that's okay, good things will
@@ -397,8 +395,6 @@ ENTRY(fuword16)
 	cmpq	%rax,%rdi
 	ja	fusufault
 
-/* XXX use the 64 extend */
-	xorq	%rax, %rax
 	movzwl	(%rdi),%eax
 	movq	$0,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
 	ret
@@ -414,8 +410,6 @@ ENTRY(fubyte)
 	cmpq	%rax,%rdi
 	ja	fusufault
 
-/* XXX use the 64 extend */
-	xorq	%rax, %rax
 	movzbl	(%rdi),%eax
 	movq	$0,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
 	ret
@@ -448,6 +442,9 @@ ENTRY(suword64)
 	movq	%rax,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
 	ret
 
+ENTRY(suword)
+	jmp	suword64
+
 ENTRY(suword32)
 	movq	PCPU(CURPCB),%rcx
 	movq	$fusufault,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
@@ -462,9 +459,6 @@ ENTRY(suword32)
 	movq	%rax,PCB_ONFAULT(%rcx)
 	ret
 
-ENTRY(suword)
-	jmp	suword32
-
 /*
  * suword16 - MP SAFE
  */