From 24b0280f8ce2fe252f57bdd98343ffd8e2da38b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dima Dorfman Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:38:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove the EXAMPLES section that describes how to sort by size using sort(1). This functionality is provided by the -S option now, and it is useful even though a similar effect is achievable with sort(1), since the latter doesn't work in combination with -h. This option is also present in NetBSD, OpenBSD, and GNU fileutils, so there's clearly a demand for it. Noticed by: asmodai --- bin/ls/ls.1 | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/ls/ls.1 b/bin/ls/ls.1 index 71a4116a411..bb73dda92e1 100644 --- a/bin/ls/ls.1 +++ b/bin/ls/ls.1 @@ -622,21 +622,6 @@ for more information. .El .Sh EXIT STATUS .Ex -std -.Sh EXAMPLES -The following is how to do an -.Nm -listing sorted by size (and shows why -.Nm -does not need a separate option for this): -.Pp -.Dl "ls -l | sort -n +4" -.Pp -Additionally, the -.Fl r -flag to -.Xr sort 1 -may be used -to get the results sorted from largest to smallest (a reverse sort). .Sh COMPATIBILITY The group field is now automatically included in the long listing for files in order to be compatible with the