From 18203af447801b387d7d9aa2bc10b9a45a2efb26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Dag-Erling=20Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 18:18:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove a comment that has been not only obsolete but patently wrong for the last 31 revisions (almost three years). --- sys/fs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c | 8 -------- sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c | 8 -------- 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c b/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c index e9523183356..e7711286c86 100644 --- a/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c +++ b/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c @@ -187,14 +187,6 @@ procfs_close(ap) if ((ap->a_fflag & FWRITE) && (pfs->pfs_flags & O_EXCL)) pfs->pfs_flags &= ~(FWRITE|O_EXCL); /* - * This rather complicated-looking code is trying to - * determine if this was the last close on this particular - * vnode. While one would expect v_usecount to be 1 at - * that point, it seems that (according to John Dyson) - * the VM system will bump up the usecount. So: if the - * usecount is 2, and VOBJBUF is set, then this is really - * the last close. Otherwise, if the usecount is < 2 - * then it is definitely the last close. * If this is the last close, then it checks to see if * the target process has PF_LINGER set in p_pfsflags, * if this is *not* the case, then the process' stop flags diff --git a/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c b/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c index e9523183356..e7711286c86 100644 --- a/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c +++ b/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_vnops.c @@ -187,14 +187,6 @@ procfs_close(ap) if ((ap->a_fflag & FWRITE) && (pfs->pfs_flags & O_EXCL)) pfs->pfs_flags &= ~(FWRITE|O_EXCL); /* - * This rather complicated-looking code is trying to - * determine if this was the last close on this particular - * vnode. While one would expect v_usecount to be 1 at - * that point, it seems that (according to John Dyson) - * the VM system will bump up the usecount. So: if the - * usecount is 2, and VOBJBUF is set, then this is really - * the last close. Otherwise, if the usecount is < 2 - * then it is definitely the last close. * If this is the last close, then it checks to see if * the target process has PF_LINGER set in p_pfsflags, * if this is *not* the case, then the process' stop flags