website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
---
2023-03-15 15:56:34 -04:00
description: >-
2023-08-30 07:06:23 -04:00
Use providers within modules. Learn about version constraints, aliases, implicit inheritance, and passing providers to modules.
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
---
# Providers Within Modules
In a configuration with multiple modules, there are some special considerations
for how resources are associated with provider configurations.
Each resource in the configuration must be associated with one provider
configuration. Provider configurations, unlike most other concepts in
2023-09-21 05:57:47 -04:00
OpenTofu, are global to an entire OpenTofu configuration and can be shared
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
across module boundaries. Provider configurations can be defined only in a
2023-08-30 07:06:23 -04:00
root module.
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
Providers can be passed down to descendent modules in two ways: either
_implicitly_ through inheritance, or _explicitly_ via the `providers` argument
within a `module` block. These two options are discussed in more detail in the
following sections.
A module intended to be called by one or more other modules must not contain
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
any `provider` blocks. A module containing its own provider configurations is
2024-12-05 07:46:02 -05:00
not compatible with the `for_each`, `count`, and `depends_on` meta-arguments.
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
Provider configurations are used for all operations on associated resources,
2023-09-21 05:57:47 -04:00
including destroying remote objects and refreshing state. OpenTofu retains, as
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
part of its state, a reference to the provider configuration that was most
recently used to apply changes to each resource. When a `resource` block is
2024-12-05 07:46:02 -05:00
removed from the configuration, or a dynamic instance of a resource is removed
by modifying the value assigned to the `count` or `for_each` meta-argument,
this record in the state will be used to locate the appropriate configuration
because the resource instance's `provider` argument (if any) will no longer be
present in the configuration.
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
As a consequence, you must ensure that all resources that belong to a
2024-12-05 07:46:02 -05:00
particular provider instance are destroyed before you can remove that
provider instance from your configuration. If OpenTofu finds a resource instance
tracked in the state whose provider instance is no longer declared in the
configuration then it will return an error during planning, prompting you
to reintroduce the provider instance.
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
## Provider Version Constraints in Modules
Although provider _configurations_ are shared between modules, each module must
2024-04-24 07:24:30 -04:00
declare its own [provider requirements](../../../language/providers/requirements.mdx), so that
2023-09-21 05:57:47 -04:00
OpenTofu can ensure that there is a single version of the provider that is
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
compatible with all modules in the configuration and to specify the
2024-04-24 07:24:30 -04:00
[source address](../../../language/providers/requirements.mdx#source-addresses) that serves as
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
the global (module-agnostic) identifier for a provider.
To declare that a module requires particular versions of a specific provider,
use a `required_providers` block inside a `terraform` block:
```hcl
terraform {
required_providers {
aws = {
2023-12-11 15:10:03 -05:00
source = "hashicorp/aws"
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
version = ">= 2.7.0"
}
}
}
```
A provider requirement says, for example, "This module requires version v2.7.0
2023-12-11 15:10:03 -05:00
of the provider `hashicorp/aws` and will refer to it as `aws`." It doesn't,
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
however, specify any of the configuration settings that determine what remote
endpoints the provider will access, such as an AWS region; configuration
2023-09-21 05:57:47 -04:00
settings come from provider _configurations_, and a particular overall OpenTofu
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
configuration can potentially have
2024-04-24 07:24:30 -04:00
[several different configurations for the same provider](../../../language/providers/configuration.mdx#alias-multiple-provider-configurations).
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
2021-02-12 14:49:00 -05:00
## Provider Aliases Within Modules
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
To declare multiple configuration names for a provider within a module, add the
`configuration_aliases` argument:
```hcl
terraform {
required_providers {
aws = {
2023-12-11 15:10:03 -05:00
source = "hashicorp/aws"
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
version = ">= 2.7.0"
configuration_aliases = [ aws.alternate ]
}
}
}
```
The above requirements are identical to the previous, with the addition of the
alias provider configuration name `aws.alternate`, which can be referenced by
resources using the `provider` argument.
2023-08-30 07:06:23 -04:00
If you are writing a shared module, constrain only the minimum
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
required provider version using a `>=` constraint. This should specify the
minimum version containing the features your module relies on, and thus allow a
user of your module to potentially select a newer provider version if other
features are needed by other parts of their overall configuration.
2024-12-05 07:46:02 -05:00
It is not currently possible to pass a provider configuration with multiple
instances (that was declared using `for_each`) as a whole to a child module,
although it is valid for the parent module to assign a single dynamic instance
of a provider configuration to each instance of the module.
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
## Implicit Provider Inheritance
For convenience in simple configurations, a child module automatically inherits
2024-04-24 07:24:30 -04:00
[default provider configurations](../../../language/providers/configuration.mdx#default-provider-configurations) from its parent. This means that
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
explicit `provider` blocks appear only in the root module, and downstream
modules can simply declare resources for that provider and have them
automatically associated with the root provider configurations.
For example, the root module might contain only a `provider` block and a
`module` block to instantiate a child module:
```hcl
provider "aws" {
region = "us-west-1"
}
module "child" {
source = "./child"
}
```
The child module can then use any resource from this provider with no further
provider configuration required:
```hcl
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "example" {
bucket = "provider-inherit-example"
}
```
We recommend using this approach when a single configuration for each provider
is sufficient for an entire configuration.
2023-09-18 07:56:28 -04:00
:::warning Note
2024-04-24 07:24:30 -04:00
Only provider configurations are inherited by child modules, not provider source or version requirements. Each module must [declare its own provider requirements](../../../language/providers/requirements.mdx). This is especially important for non-HashiCorp providers.
2023-09-18 07:56:28 -04:00
:::
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
In more complex situations there may be
2024-04-24 07:24:30 -04:00
[multiple provider configurations](../../../language/providers/configuration.mdx#alias-multiple-provider-configurations),
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
or a child module may need to use different provider settings than
its parent. For such situations, you must pass providers explicitly.
## Passing Providers Explicitly
When child modules each need a different configuration of a particular
provider, or where the child module requires a different provider configuration
than its parent, you can use the `providers` argument within a `module` block
to explicitly define which provider configurations are available to the
child module. For example:
```hcl
# The default "aws" configuration is used for AWS resources in the root
# module where no explicit provider instance is selected.
provider "aws" {
region = "us-west-1"
}
# An alternate configuration is also defined for a different
# region, using the alias "usw2".
provider "aws" {
alias = "usw2"
region = "us-west-2"
}
# An example child module is instantiated with the alternate configuration,
# so any AWS resources it defines will use the us-west-2 region.
module "example" {
source = "./example"
providers = {
aws = aws.usw2
}
}
```
2024-12-05 07:46:02 -05:00
[The `providers` argument within a `module` block](../../../language/meta-arguments/module-providers.mdx)
is similar to
[the `provider` argument within a `resource` block](../../../language/meta-arguments/resource-provider.mdx),
but is a mapping rather than a single string because a module may
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
contain resources from many different providers.
The keys of the `providers` map are provider configuration names as expected by
the child module, and the values are the names of corresponding configurations
in the _current_ module.
Once the `providers` argument is used in a `module` block, it overrides all of
the default inheritance behavior, so it is necessary to enumerate mappings
for _all_ of the required providers. This is to avoid confusion and surprises
that may result when mixing both implicit and explicit provider passing.
Additional provider configurations (those with the `alias` argument set) are
_never_ inherited automatically by child modules, and so must always be passed
explicitly using the `providers` map. For example, a module
that configures connectivity between networks in two AWS regions is likely
to need both a source and a destination region. In that case, the root module
may look something like this:
```hcl
provider "aws" {
alias = "usw1"
region = "us-west-1"
}
provider "aws" {
alias = "usw2"
region = "us-west-2"
}
module "tunnel" {
source = "./tunnel"
providers = {
aws.src = aws.usw1
aws.dst = aws.usw2
}
}
```
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
The subdirectory `./tunnel` must then declare the configuration aliases for the
2021-02-12 14:57:26 -05:00
provider so the calling module can pass configurations with these names in its `providers` argument:
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
```hcl
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
terraform {
required_providers {
aws = {
2023-12-11 15:10:03 -05:00
source = "hashicorp/aws"
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
version = ">= 2.7.0"
2022-03-09 15:26:10 -05:00
configuration_aliases = [ aws.src, aws.dst ]
2021-02-12 11:44:26 -05:00
}
}
website: Break up main Modules and Module Development pages
This one is a lot like the previous two commits, but slightly more complex:
- Only adding one new meta-argument page, for `providers`; otherwise, it just
re-uses the dual-purpose pages I made in the resources commit.
- About that `providers` argument: The stuff that was relevant to consumers of a
module went in that meta-argument page, but there was also a huge deep dive on
how the _author_ of a re-usable module should handle provider configurations
in cases where inheriting the default providers isn't sufficient. THAT, I
moved into a new page in the module development section. (For the consumer of
a module, this should all be an implementation detail; the module README
should tell you which aliased providers you need to configure and pass, and
then you just do it, without worrying about proxy configuration blocks etc.)
- The "standard module structure" recommendations in the main module development
page gets a page of its own, to make it more prominent and discoverable.
- Same deal with using the old URL as a landing page, at least for the main
module calls page. It didn't seem necessary for the module development page.
2020-11-12 21:21:35 -05:00
}
```
Each resource should then have its own `provider` attribute set to either
`aws.src` or `aws.dst` to choose which of the two provider configurations to
use.