Since the commit "MINOR: hlua/h1: Use http_parse_cont_len_header() to parse
content-length value", this function is no longer used. So it can be safely
removed.
When the request is too large to fit in a buffer a 414 or a 431 error
message is returned depending on the error state of the request parser. A
414 is returned if the URI is too long, otherwise a 431 is returned.
This patch should fix the issue #1309.
haproxy supports tunnel establishment through HTTP Upgrade mechanism.
Since the following commit, extended CONNECT is also supported for
HTTP/2 both on frontend and backend side.
commit 9bf957335e
MEDIUM: mux_h2: generate Extended CONNECT from htx upgrade
As specified by HTTP/2 rfc, "h2c" can be used by an HTTP/1.1 client to
request an upgrade to HTTP/2. In haproxy, this is not supported so it
silently ignores this. However, Connection and Upgrade headers are
forwarded as-is on the backend side.
If using HTTP/1 on the backend side and the server supports this upgrade
mechanism, haproxy won't be able to parse the HTTP response. If using
HTTP/2, mux backend tries to incorrectly convert the request to an
Extended CONNECT with h2c protocol, which may also prevent the response
to be transmitted.
To fix this, flag HTTP/1 request with "h2c" or "h2" token in an upgrade
header. On converting the header list to HTX, the upgrade header is
skipped if any of this token is present and the H1_MF_CONN_UPG flag is
removed.
This issue can easily be reproduced using curl --http2 argument to
connect to an HTTP/1 frontend.
This must be backported up to 2.4 after a period of observation.
In 2.5-dev9, commit 631c7e866 ("MEDIUM: h1: Force close mode for invalid
uses of T-E header") enforced a recently arrived new security rule in the
HTTP specification aiming at preventing a class of content-smuggling
attacks involving HTTP/1.0 agents. It consists in handling the very rare
T-E + C-L requests or responses in close mode.
It happens it does have an impact of a rare few and very old clients
(probably running insecure TLS stacks by the way) that continue to send
both with their POST requests. The impact is that for each and every
request they'll have to reconnect, possibly negotiating a full TLS
handshake that becomes harmful to the machine in terms of CPU computation.
This commit adds a new option "h1-do-not-close-on-insecure-transfer-encoding"
that does exactly what it says, it just asks not to close on such messages,
even though the message continues to be sanitized and C-L dropped. It means
that the risk is only between the sender and haproxy, which is limited, and
might be the only acceptable solution for such environments having to deal
with broken implementations.
The cases are so rare that it should not need to be backported, or in the
worst case, to the latest LTS if there is any demand.
It is similar to the previous fix but for the chunk size parsing. But this
one is more annoying because a poorly coded application in front of haproxy
may ignore the last digit before the LF thinking it should be a CR. In this
case it may be out of sync with HAProxy and that could be exploited to
perform some sort or request smuggling attack.
While it seems unlikely, it is safer to forbid LF with CR at the end of a
chunk size.
This patch must be backported to 2.9 and probably to all stable versions
because there is no reason to still support LF without CR in this case.
When the message is chunked, all chunks must ends with a CRLF. However, on
old versions, to support bad client or server implementations, the LF only
was also accepted. Nowadays, it seems useless and can even be considered as
an issue. Just forbid LF only at the end of chunks, it seems reasonnable.
This patch must be backported to 2.9 and probably to all stable versions
because there is no reason to still support LF without CR in this case.
At a few places in the code the switch/case ond flags are tested against
64-bit constants without explicitly being marked as long long. Some
32-bit compilers complain that the constant is too large for a long, and
other likely always use long long there. Better fix that as it's uncertain
what others which do not complain do. It may be backported to avoid doubts
on uncommon platforms if needed, as it touches very few areas.
If H1 headers are not fully received at once, the parsing is restarted a
last time when all headers are finally received. When this happens, the h1m
flags are sanitized to remove all value set during parsing.
But some flags where erroneously preserved. Among others, H1_MF_TE_CHUNKED
flag was not removed, what could lead to parsing error.
To fix the bug and make things easy, a mask has been added with all flags
that must be preserved. It will be more stable. This mask is used to
sanitize h1m flags.
This patch should fix the issue #1469. It must be backported to 2.5.
According to the RFC7230, "chunked" encoding must not be applied more than
once to a message body. To handle this case, h1_parse_xfer_enc_header() is
now responsible to fail when a parsing error is found. It also fails if the
"chunked" encoding is not the last one for a request.
To help the parsing, two H1 parser flags have been added: H1_MF_TE_CHUNKED
and H1_MF_TE_OTHER. These flags are set, respectively, when "chunked"
encoding and any other encoding are found. H1_MF_CHNK flag is used when
"chunked" encoding is the last one.
The allowed chunk size was historically limited to 2GB to avoid risk of
overflow. This restriction is no longer necessary because the chunk size is
immediately stored into a 64bits integer after the parsing. Thus, it is now
possible to raise this limit. However to never fed possibly bogus values
from languages that use floats for their integers, we don't get more than 13
hexa-digit (2^52 - 1). 4 petabytes is probably enough !
This patch should fix the issue #1065. It may be backported as far as
2.1. For the 2.0, the legacy HTTP part must be reviewed. But there is
honestely no reason to do so.
Add the header Sec-Websocket-Key when generating a h1 handshake websocket
without this header. This is the case when doing h2-h1 conversion.
The key is randomly generated and base64 encoded. It is stored on the session
side to be able to verify response key and reject it if not valid.
Add the Sec-Websocket-Accept header on a websocket handshake response.
This header may be missing if a h2 server is used with a h1 client.
The response key is calculated following the rfc6455. For this, the
handshake request key must be stored in the h1 session, as a new field
name ws_key. Note that this is only done if the message has been
prealably identified as a Websocket handshake request.
If a request is identified as a WebSocket handshake, it must contains a
websocket key header or else it can be reject, following the rfc6455.
A new flag H1_MF_UPG_WEBSOCKET is set on such messages. For the request
te be identified as a WebSocket handshake, it must contains the headers:
Connection: upgrade
Upgrade: websocket
This commit is a compagnon of
"MEDIUM: h1: generate WebSocket key on response if needed" and
"MEDIUM: h1: add a WebSocket key on handshake if needed".
Indeed, it ensures that a WebSocket key is added only from a http/2 side
and not for a http/1 bogus peer.
The file was moved as-is. There was a wrong dependency on dynbuf.h
instead of buf.h which was addressed. There was no benefit to
splitting this between types and functions.
