mirror of
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy.git
synced 2026-06-13 10:50:16 -04:00
BUG/MINOR: cpu-topo: use ha_diag_notice() to report thread creations
Using ha_diag_warning() to report the number of threads created resulted in warnings being counted and possibly an error being fired when combined with -dW: $ printf "global\nstats socket /tmp/sock1\n" | ./haproxy -dD -dW -c -f /dev/stdin; echo $? [NOTICE] (10406) : haproxy version is 3.5-dev0-5091ac-35 [NOTICE] (10406) : path to executable is ./haproxy [DIAG] (10406) : Created 20 threads split into 2 groups [ALERT] (10406) : Some warnings were found and 'zero-warning' is set. Aborting. 1 Now that we have ha_diag_notice(), let's use it: $ printf "global\nstats socket /tmp/sock1\n" | ./haproxy -dD -dW -c -f /dev/stdin; echo $? [DIAG] (10513) : Created 20 threads split into 2 groups 0 It would make sense to backport this to 3.2 because it helps validate configs against diag warnings without triggering a false positive. It depends on this previous patch: MINOR: errors: add ha_diag_notice() to report diag-level notifications
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d63efa5f5
commit
960fa1c921
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static int cpu_policy_first_usable_node(int policy, int tmin, int tmax, int gmin
|
|||
if (tmin <= thr_count && thr_count < tmax)
|
||||
tmax = thr_count;
|
||||
|
||||
ha_diag_warning("Multi-socket cpu detected, automatically binding on active CPUs of '%d' (%u active cpu(s))\n", first_node_id, cpu_count);
|
||||
ha_diag_notice("Multi-socket cpu detected, automatically binding on active CPUs of '%d' (%u active cpu(s))\n", first_node_id, cpu_count);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!global.nbthread)
|
||||
global.nbthread = tmax;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1586,9 +1586,9 @@ static int cpu_policy_group_by_cluster(int policy, int tmin, int tmax, int gmin,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (global.nbthread)
|
||||
ha_diag_warning("Created %d threads split into %d groups\n", global.nbthread, global.nbtgroups);
|
||||
ha_diag_notice("Created %d threads split into %d groups\n", global.nbthread, global.nbtgroups);
|
||||
else
|
||||
ha_diag_warning("Could not determine any CPU cluster\n");
|
||||
ha_diag_notice("Could not determine any CPU cluster\n");
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1684,9 +1684,9 @@ static int cpu_policy_group_by_ccx(int policy, int tmin, int tmax, int gmin, int
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (global.nbthread)
|
||||
ha_diag_warning("Created %d threads split into %d groups\n", global.nbthread, global.nbtgroups);
|
||||
ha_diag_notice("Created %d threads split into %d groups\n", global.nbthread, global.nbtgroups);
|
||||
else
|
||||
ha_diag_warning("Could not determine any CPU cluster\n");
|
||||
ha_diag_notice("Could not determine any CPU cluster\n");
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue