upstream/haproxy
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy.git synced 2026-06-09 08:51:28 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 7

MINOR: checks: use conn_full_close() instead of conn_force_close()

Browse source 
There's no point in using conn_force_close() in the checks since they
do not use XPRT_TRACKED so both functions are equivalent.
This commit is contained in:
Willy Tarreau 2017-10-05 17:53:13 +02:00
parent 8c82901958
commit 402dbc11d5
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/checks.c
View file

@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static int wake_srv_chk(struct connection *conn)
* sure want to abort the hard way.
*/
conn_sock_drain(conn);
conn_force_close(conn);
conn_full_close(conn);
ret = -1;
}
@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static struct task *process_chk_conn(struct task *t)
* server state to be suddenly changed.
*/
conn_sock_drain(conn);
conn_force_close(conn);
conn_full_close(conn);
}
if (conn) {
@ -2640,7 +2640,7 @@ static int tcpcheck_main(struct check *check)
* 3: release and replace the old one on success
*/
if (check->conn) {
conn_force_close(check->conn);
conn_full_close(check->conn);
retcode = -1; /* do not reuse the fd! */
}