mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-02-19 03:57:49 -05:00
462ad7bb33
On an open PR that is waiting for job approval, if jobs haven't been approved by the time the abandon timeout occurs they get marked as cancelled. This doesn't match the expectations of abandoned jobs in my opinion, which is that they were never able to be dispatched to a runner (no matching labels), but these jobs never got a chance. They should remain valid and blocked until approved. Discovered while testing #11125, but unrelated to the behaviour fixed there. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11145 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| artifact.go | ||
| forgejo.go | ||
| forgejo_test.go | ||
| main_test.go | ||
| pre_execution_errors.go | ||
| pre_execution_errors_test.go | ||
| run.go | ||
| run_job.go | ||
| run_job_list.go | ||
| run_job_status_test.go | ||
| run_job_test.go | ||
| run_list.go | ||
| run_test.go | ||
| runner.go | ||
| runner_list.go | ||
| runner_test.go | ||
| runner_token.go | ||
| runner_token_test.go | ||
| schedule.go | ||
| schedule_spec.go | ||
| schedule_spec_list.go | ||
| schedule_spec_test.go | ||
| status.go | ||
| task.go | ||
| task_list.go | ||
| task_output.go | ||
| task_step.go | ||
| task_test.go | ||
| tasks_version.go | ||
| user.go | ||
| user_test.go | ||
| utils.go | ||
| utils_test.go | ||
| variable.go | ||