Drop support of EoL python versions for running system tests. The
maintenance cost of supporting end of life ecosystem, especially Python
3.6 on EL8 and the related outdated packages (pytest, dnspython, ...),
has become unreasonable.
(cherry picked from commit ac8e2905b8)
Detect whether and where the xmllint utility is available at build time,
so that it can be used in system tests. If the tool is not found,
specific checks employing it will be skipped.
(cherry picked from commit 85773d4d21)
Detect whether and where the jq utility is available at build time, so
that it can be used in system tests. If the tool is not found, specific
checks employing it will be skipped.
(cherry picked from commit 273b4bbfd7)
Use .sh(.in) file extension consistently for shell scripts
to allow more reliable detection of shell scripts based on their file
extension.
(cherry picked from commit 2d690499dd)
libsystemd, despite being useful, adds a huge surface area for just
using the sd_notify API. libsystemd's surface has been exploited in the
past [1].
Implement the systemd notification protocol by hand since it is just
sending newline-delimited datagrams to a UNIX socket. The code shouldn't
need more attention in the future since the notification protocol is
covered under systemd's stability promise [2].
We don't need to support VSOCK-backed service notifications since they
are only intended for virtual machine inits.
[1]: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4
[2]: https://systemd.io/PORTABILITY_AND_STABILITY/
(cherry picked from commit 3eb253e81f)
Release automation went wrong, it seems. And I just glanced over the
line, saw 4 -> 5 change at the end and did not notice the change at the
beginning of the line...
Administrators may wish to constrain the set of cores that BIND 9 runs
on via the 'taskset', 'cpuset' or 'numactl' programs (or equivalent on
other O/S), for example to achieve higher (or more stable) performance
by more closely associating threads with individual NIC rx queues. If
the admin has used taskset, it follows that BIND ought to
automatically use the given number of CPUs rather than the system wide
count.
Co-Authored-By: Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5a2df8caf5)
Although the nanual page of malloc_usable_size says:
Although the excess bytes can be over‐written by the application
without ill effects, this is not good programming practice: the
number of excess bytes in an allocation depends on the underlying
implementation.
it looks like the premise is broken with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 on newer
systems and it might return a value that causes program to stop with
"buffer overflow" detected from the _FORTIFY_SOURCE. As we do have own
implementation that tracks the allocation size that we can use to track
the allocation size, we can stop relying on this introspection function.
Also the newer manual page for malloc_usable_size changed the NOTES to:
The value returned by malloc_usable_size() may be greater than the
requested size of the allocation because of various internal
implementation details, none of which the programmer should rely on.
This function is intended to only be used for diagnostics and
statistics; writing to the excess memory without first calling
realloc(3) to resize the allocation is not supported. The returned
value is only valid at the time of the call.
Remove usage of both malloc_usable_size() and malloc_size() to be on the
safe size and only use the internal size tracking mechanism when
jemalloc is not available.
(cherry picked from commit d61712d14e)
It looks like that all supported systems now have support for
_POSIX_SAVED_IDS, so it's safe to use setegid() and setegid() because
those will not change saved used/group IDs.
(cherry picked from commit ab517fc6e4)
GCC 11.1+ emits a note during compilation when there are 64-bit
atomic fields in a structure, because it fixed a compiler bug
by changing the alignment of such fields, which caused ABI change.
Add -Wno-psabi to CFLAGS for such builds in order to silence the
warning. That shouldn't be a problem since we don't expose our
structures to the outside.
(cherry picked from commit 867066aa53)
The PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP and PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP are
usually not defines, but enum values, so simple preprocessor check
doesn't work.
Check for PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP from the autoconf AS_COMPILE_IFELSE
block and define HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_ADAPTIVE_NP. This should enable
adaptive mutex on Linux and FreeBSD.
As PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK actually comes from POSIX and Linux glibc
does define it when compatibility macros are being set, we can just use
PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK instead of PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP.
(cherry picked from commit cc4f99bc6d)
To avoid any escaping issues or messing with a language-specific format
when the variable has to be parsed, create a dedicated file for each
variable that is obtained from autoconf.
Remove conf.sh.in and move the environment variables into isctest/vars
python package. This enabled the removal of an ugly pytest hack which
loaded and parsed these variables from the environment.
now that "qpzone" databases are available for use in zones, we no
longer need to retain the zone semantics in the "qp" database.
all zone-specific code has been removed from QPDB, and "configure
--with-zonedb" once again takes two values, rbt and qp.
some database API methods that are never used with a cache have
been removed from qpdb.c and qp-cachedb.c; these include newversion,
closeversion, subtractrdataset, and nodefullname.
use the dns_qpmulti-based "qpzone" by default throughout BIND,
instead of the existing dns_qp-based "qp", when creating zone
databases. (cache databases still use "qp".)
the "--with-zonedb" option has been updated in configure.ac to permit
the use of both "qp" and "qpzone" databases.
in zone.c there was a test that prevented any database type other than
"qp" from hosting an RPZ. this was outdated, and has been removed.
by default, QPDB is the database used by named and all tools and
unit tests. the old default of RBTDB can now be restored by using
"configure --with-zonedb=rbt --with-cachedb=rbt".
some tests have been fixed so they will work correctly with either
database.
CHANGES and release notes have been updated to reflect this change.
As it was pointed out, the alignas() can't be used on objects larger
than `max_align_t` otherwise the compiler might miscompile the code to
use auto-vectorization on unaligned memory.
As we were only using alignas() as a way to prevent false memory
sharing, we can use manual padding in the affected structures.