3104. [bug] Better support for cross-compiling. [RT #24367]

This commit is contained in:
Evan Hunt 2011-05-05 19:22:19 +00:00
parent c2bfd89aa1
commit f9d92ced79
2 changed files with 23 additions and 31 deletions

View file

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
3104. [bug] Better support for cross-compiling. [RT #24367]
3099. [test] "dlz" system test now runs but gives R:SKIPPED if
not compiled with --with-dlz-filesystem. [RT #24146]

View file

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ AC_DIVERT_PUSH(1)dnl
esyscmd([sed "s/^/# /" COPYRIGHT])dnl
AC_DIVERT_POP()dnl
AC_REVISION($Revision: 1.457.26.33 $)
AC_REVISION($Revision: 1.457.26.34 $)
AC_INIT(lib/dns/name.c)
AC_PREREQ(2.59)
@ -1605,10 +1605,8 @@ char a[16],b[64]; return(inet_ntop(AF_INET6, a, b, sizeof(b)) == (char*)0);}],
ISC_EXTRA_OBJS="$ISC_EXTRA_OBJS inet_ntop.$O"
ISC_EXTRA_SRCS="$ISC_EXTRA_SRCS inet_ntop.c"
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP="#define ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP 1"],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(assuming inet_ntop needed)
ISC_EXTRA_OBJS="$ISC_EXTRA_OBJS inet_ntop.$O"
ISC_EXTRA_SRCS="$ISC_EXTRA_SRCS inet_ntop.c"
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP="#define ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP 1"])
[AC_MSG_RESULT(assuming inet_ntop not needed)
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP="#undef ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP"])
# On NetBSD 1.4.2 and maybe others, inet_pton() incorrectly accepts
@ -1630,14 +1628,10 @@ main() { char a[16]; return (inet_pton(AF_INET, "1.2.3", a) == 1 ? 1 :
ISC_EXTRA_OBJS="$ISC_EXTRA_OBJS inet_pton.$O"
ISC_EXTRA_SRCS="$ISC_EXTRA_SRCS inet_pton.c"
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON="#define ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON 1"],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(assuming target platform has working inet_pton)
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON="#undef ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON"],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(assuming inet_pton needed)
ISC_EXTRA_OBJS="$ISC_EXTRA_OBJS inet_pton.$O"
ISC_EXTRA_SRCS="$ISC_EXTRA_SRCS inet_pton.c"
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON="#define ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON 1"],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(assuming target platform has working inet_pton)
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON="#undef ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON"])
ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON="#define ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON 1"])
AC_SUBST(ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDNTOP)
AC_SUBST(ISC_PLATFORM_NEEDPTON)
@ -2090,8 +2084,9 @@ ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE="#define ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE long long int"],
],[AC_MSG_ERROR(this cannot happen)])
],[AC_MSG_ERROR(this cannot happen)])
],[
ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE="#define ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE long long int"
AC_MSG_RESULT(cannot determine type of rlim_cur when cross compiling - assuming long long int)])
AC_ARG_WITH(rlimtype, , rlimtype="$withval", rlimtype="long long int")
ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE="#define ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE $rlimtype"
AC_MSG_RESULT(cannot determine type of rlim_cur when cross compiling - assuming $rlimtype)])
])
AC_SUBST(ISC_PLATFORM_RLIMITTYPE)
@ -2298,27 +2293,22 @@ if test "$use_atomic" = "yes"; then
[i[3456]86-*])
# XXX: some old x86 architectures actually do not support
# (some of) these operations. Do we need stricter checks?
AC_TRY_RUN([
main() {
exit((sizeof(void *) == 8) ? 0 : 1);
}
],
[arch=x86_64
have_xaddq=yes],
[arch=x86_32],
[arch=x86_32])
AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([void *])
if test $ac_cv_sizeof_void_p = 8; then
arch=x86_64
have_xaddq=yes
else
arch=x86_32
fi
;;
x86_64-*|amd64-*)
AC_TRY_RUN([
main() {
exit((sizeof(void *) == 8) ? 0 : 1);
}
],
[arch=x86_64
have_xaddq=yes],
[arch=x86_32],
[arch=x86_64
have_xaddq=yes])
AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([void *])
if test $ac_cv_sizeof_void_p = 8; then
arch=x86_64
have_xaddq=yes
else
arch=x86_32
fi
;;
alpha*-*)
arch=alpha