diff --git a/doc/arm/notes.xml b/doc/arm/notes.xml
index e98fdbb159..34951a53f5 100644
--- a/doc/arm/notes.xml
+++ b/doc/arm/notes.xml
@@ -625,43 +625,45 @@
Several bugs have been fixed in the RPZ implementation:
-
- Policy zones that did not specifically require recursion
- could be treated as if they did; consequently, setting
- qname-wait-recurse no; was
- sometimes ineffective. This has been corrected.
- In most configurations, behavioral changes due to this
- fix will not be noticeable. [RT #39229]
-
-
-
-
- The server could crash if policy zones were updated (e.g.
- via rndc reload or an incoming zone
- transfer) while RPZ processing was still ongoing for an
- active query. [RT #39415]
-
-
-
-
- On servers with one or more policy zones configured as
- slaves, if a policy zone updated during regular operation
- (rather than at startup) using a full zone reload, such as
- via AXFR, a bug could allow the RPZ summary data to fall out
- of sync, potentially leading to an assertion failure in
- rpz.c when further incremental updates were made to the
- zone, such as via IXFR. [RT #39567]
-
-
-
-
- The server could match a shorter prefix than what was
- available in CLIENT-IP policy triggers, and so, an
- unexpected action could be taken. This has been
- corrected. [RT #39481]
-
-
-
+
+
+ Policy zones that did not specifically require recursion
+ could be treated as if they did; consequently, setting
+ qname-wait-recurse no; was
+ sometimes ineffective. This has been corrected.
+ In most configurations, behavioral changes due to this
+ fix will not be noticeable. [RT #39229]
+
+
+
+
+ The server could crash if policy zones were updated (e.g.
+ via rndc reload or an incoming zone
+ transfer) while RPZ processing was still ongoing for an
+ active query. [RT #39415]
+
+
+
+
+ On servers with one or more policy zones configured as
+ slaves, if a policy zone updated during regular operation
+ (rather than at startup) using a full zone reload, such as
+ via AXFR, a bug could allow the RPZ summary data to fall out
+ of sync, potentially leading to an assertion failure in
+ rpz.c when further incremental updates were made to the
+ zone, such as via IXFR. [RT #39567]
+
+
+
+
+ The server could match a shorter prefix than what was
+ available in CLIENT-IP policy triggers, and so, an
+ unexpected action could be taken. This has been
+ corrected. [RT #39481]
+
+
+
+