mirror of
https://github.com/isc-projects/bind9.git
synced 2026-06-08 18:22:05 -04:00
Merge branch 'security-dlz-axfr-deny-broken' into security-master
denied axfr requests were not effective for writable DLZ zones See merge request isc-private/bind9!57
This commit is contained in:
commit
8514320271
5 changed files with 42 additions and 12 deletions
4
CHANGES
4
CHANGES
|
|
@ -87,7 +87,9 @@
|
|||
and "nsdname-enable" both now default to yes,
|
||||
regardless of compile-time settings. [GL #824]
|
||||
|
||||
5141. [placeholder]
|
||||
5141. [security] Zone transfer controls for writable DLZ zones were
|
||||
not effective as the allowzonexfr method was not being
|
||||
called for such zones. (CVE-2019-6465) [GL #790]
|
||||
|
||||
5140. [bug] Don't immediately mark existing keys as inactive and
|
||||
deleted when running dnssec-keymgr for the first
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -536,10 +536,22 @@ dlz_lookup(const char *zone, const char *name, void *dbdata,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
isc_result_t
|
||||
dlz_allowzonexfr(void *dbdata, const char *name, const char *client) {
|
||||
UNUSED(client);
|
||||
isc_result_t result;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Just say yes for all our zones */
|
||||
return (dlz_findzonedb(dbdata, name, NULL, NULL));
|
||||
result = dlz_findzonedb(dbdata, name, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
return (result);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Exception for 10.53.0.5 so we can test that allow-transfer
|
||||
* is effective.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (strcmp(client, "10.53.0.5") == 0) {
|
||||
return (ISC_R_NOPERM);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return (ISC_R_SUCCESS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -108,15 +108,23 @@ test_update testdc1.alternate.nil. A "86400 A 10.53.0.10" "10.53.0.10" || ret=1
|
|||
status=`expr $status + $ret`
|
||||
|
||||
newtest "testing AXFR from DLZ drivers"
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS +noall +answer axfr example.nil > dig.out.ns1.test$n
|
||||
lines=`cat dig.out.ns1.test$n | wc -l`
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS +noall +answer axfr example.nil > dig.out.example.ns1.test$n
|
||||
lines=`cat dig.out.example.ns1.test$n | wc -l`
|
||||
[ ${lines:-0} -eq 4 ] || ret=1
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS +noall +answer axfr alternate.nil > dig.out.ns1.test$n
|
||||
lines=`cat dig.out.ns1.test$n | wc -l`
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS +noall +answer axfr alternate.nil > dig.out.alternate.ns1.test$n
|
||||
lines=`cat dig.out.alternate.ns1.test$n | wc -l`
|
||||
[ ${lines:-0} -eq 5 ] || ret=1
|
||||
[ "$ret" -eq 0 ] || echo_i "failed"
|
||||
status=`expr $status + $ret`
|
||||
|
||||
newtest "testing AXFR denied from DLZ drivers"
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS -b 10.53.0.5 +noall +answer axfr example.nil > dig.out.example.ns1.test$n
|
||||
grep "; Transfer failed" dig.out.example.ns1.test$n > /dev/null || ret=1
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS -b 10.53.0.5 +noall +answer axfr alternate.nil > dig.out.alternate.ns1.test$n
|
||||
grep "; Transfer failed" dig.out.alternate.ns1.test$n > /dev/null || ret=1
|
||||
[ "$ret" -eq 0 ] || echo_i "failed"
|
||||
status=`expr $status + $ret`
|
||||
|
||||
newtest "testing unsearched/unregistered DLZ zone is not found"
|
||||
$DIG $DIGOPTS +noall +answer ns other.nil > dig.out.ns1.test$n
|
||||
grep "3600.IN.NS.other.nil." dig.out.ns1.test$n > /dev/null && ret=1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -157,6 +157,14 @@
|
|||
[GL #772]
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Zone transfer controls for writable DLZ zones were not
|
||||
effective as the <command>allowzonexfr</command> method was
|
||||
not being called for such zones. This flaw is disclosed in
|
||||
CVE-2019-6465. [GL #790]
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -817,12 +817,12 @@ ns_xfr_start(ns_client_t *client, dns_rdatatype_t reqtype) {
|
|||
result = dns_zt_find(client->view->zonetable, question_name, 0, NULL,
|
||||
&zone);
|
||||
|
||||
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS || dns_zone_gettype(zone) == dns_zone_dlz) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Normal zone table does not have a match.
|
||||
* Try the DLZ database
|
||||
* The normal zone table does not have a match, or this is
|
||||
* marked in the zone table as a DLZ zone. Check the DLZ
|
||||
* databases for a match.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
// Temporary: only searching the first DLZ database
|
||||
if (! ISC_LIST_EMPTY(client->view->dlz_searched)) {
|
||||
result = dns_dlzallowzonexfr(client->view,
|
||||
question_name,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue