mirror of
https://github.com/isc-projects/bind9.git
synced 2026-06-11 00:50:00 -04:00
Merge branch 'security-4480-drop-sig0-support' into 'v9.18.28-release'
[9.18] [CVE-2024-1975] Remove support for SIG(0) message verification See merge request isc-private/bind9!690
This commit is contained in:
commit
1e6cf868dd
12 changed files with 48 additions and 124 deletions
3
CHANGES
3
CHANGES
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
|
|||
6402. [security] Remove SIG(0) support from named as a countermeasure
|
||||
for CVE-2024-1975. [GL #4480]
|
||||
|
||||
6401. [security] An excessively large number of rrtypes per owner can
|
||||
slow down database query processing, so a limit has been
|
||||
placed on the number of rrtypes that can be stored per
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ if (!defined($path)) {
|
|||
exit(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Enable output autoflush so that it's not lost when the parent sends TERM.
|
||||
select STDOUT;
|
||||
$| = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
unlink($path);
|
||||
my $server = IO::Socket::UNIX->new(Local => $path, Type => SOCK_STREAM, Listen => 8) or
|
||||
die "unable to create socket $path";
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,6 +54,7 @@ if ($timeout != 0) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
while (my $client = $server->accept()) {
|
||||
printf("accept()\n");
|
||||
$client->recv(my $buf, 8, 0);
|
||||
my ($version, $req_len) = unpack('N N', $buf);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ status=$((status + ret))
|
|||
|
||||
echo_i "testing external update policy (CNAME) with auth sock ($n)"
|
||||
ret=0
|
||||
$PERL ./authsock.pl --type=CNAME --path=ns1/auth.sock --pidfile=authsock.pid --timeout=120 >/dev/null 2>&1 &
|
||||
$PERL ./authsock.pl --type=CNAME --path=ns1/auth.sock --pidfile=authsock.pid --timeout=120 >authsock.log 2>&1 &
|
||||
sleep 1
|
||||
test_update $n testcname.example.nil. CNAME "86400 CNAME testdenied.example.nil" "testdenied" || ret=1
|
||||
n=$((n + 1))
|
||||
|
|
@ -131,17 +131,19 @@ n=$((n + 1))
|
|||
if [ "$ret" -ne 0 ]; then echo_i "failed"; fi
|
||||
status=$((status + ret))
|
||||
|
||||
echo_i "testing external policy with SIG(0) key ($n)"
|
||||
echo_i "testing external policy with unsupported SIG(0) key ($n)"
|
||||
ret=0
|
||||
$NSUPDATE -k ns1/Kkey.example.nil.*.private <<END >/dev/null 2>&1 || ret=1
|
||||
$NSUPDATE -d -k ns1/Kkey.example.nil.*.private <<END >nsupdate.out${n} 2>&1 || true
|
||||
debug
|
||||
server 10.53.0.1 ${PORT}
|
||||
zone example.nil
|
||||
update add fred.example.nil 120 cname foo.bar.
|
||||
send
|
||||
END
|
||||
output=$($DIG $DIGOPTS +short cname fred.example.nil.)
|
||||
[ -n "$output" ] || ret=1
|
||||
[ $ret -eq 0 ] || echo_i "failed"
|
||||
# update must have failed - SIG(0) signer is not supported
|
||||
[ -n "$output" ] && ret=1
|
||||
grep -F "signer=key.example.nil" authsock.log >/dev/null && ret=1
|
||||
n=$((n + 1))
|
||||
if [ "$ret" -ne 0 ]; then echo_i "failed"; fi
|
||||
status=$((status + ret))
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -229,10 +229,12 @@ fi
|
|||
n=$((n + 1))
|
||||
|
||||
if test -f keyname; then
|
||||
echo_i "checking update forwarding to with sig0 ($n)"
|
||||
echo_i "checking update forwarding to with sig0 (expected to fail) ($n)"
|
||||
ret=0
|
||||
keyname=$(cat keyname)
|
||||
$NSUPDATE -k $keyname.private -- - <<EOF
|
||||
# SIG(0) is removed, update is expected to fail.
|
||||
{
|
||||
$NSUPDATE -k $keyname.private -- - <<EOF
|
||||
local 10.53.0.1
|
||||
server 10.53.0.3 ${PORT}
|
||||
zone example2
|
||||
|
|
@ -240,8 +242,9 @@ if test -f keyname; then
|
|||
update add unsigned.example2. 600 TXT Foo
|
||||
send
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
} >nsupdate.out.$n 2>&1 && ret=1
|
||||
$DIG -p ${PORT} unsigned.example2 A @10.53.0.1 >dig.out.ns1.test$n || ret=1
|
||||
grep "status: NOERROR" dig.out.ns1.test$n >/dev/null || ret=1
|
||||
grep "status: NOERROR" dig.out.ns1.test$n >/dev/null && ret=1
|
||||
if [ $ret != 0 ]; then echo_i "failed"; fi
|
||||
status=$((status + ret))
|
||||
n=$((n + 1))
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -391,10 +391,8 @@ Notes
|
|||
.. [#rfc1035_2] CLASS ANY queries are not supported. This is considered a
|
||||
feature.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#rfc2931] When receiving a query signed with a SIG(0), the server is
|
||||
only able to verify the signature if it has the key in its local
|
||||
authoritative data; it cannot do recursion or validation to
|
||||
retrieve unknown keys.
|
||||
.. [#rfc2931] Support for SIG(0) message verification was removed
|
||||
as part of the mitigation of CVE-2024-1975.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#rfc2874] Compliance is with loading and serving of A6 records only.
|
||||
A6 records were moved to the experimental category by :rfc:`3363`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ or ports come preconfigured with local (loopback address) security preconfigured
|
|||
If ``rndc`` is being invoked from a remote host, further configuration is required.
|
||||
The ``nsupdate`` tool uses **Dynamic DNS (DDNS)** features and allows users to dynamically
|
||||
change the contents of the zone file(s). ``nsupdate`` access and security may be controlled
|
||||
using ``named.conf`` :ref:`statements or using TSIG or SIG(0) cryptographic methods <dynamic_update_security>`.
|
||||
using ``named.conf`` :ref:`statements or via the TSIG cryptographic method <dynamic_update_security>`.
|
||||
Clearly, if the remote hosts used for either ``rndc`` or DDNS lie within a network entirely
|
||||
under the user's control, the security threat may be regarded as non-existent. Any implementation requirements,
|
||||
therefore, depend on the site's security policy.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7450,7 +7450,7 @@ the zone's filename, unless :any:`inline-signing` is enabled.
|
|||
updates are allowed. It specifies a set of rules, in which each rule
|
||||
either grants or denies permission for one or more names in the zone to
|
||||
be updated by one or more identities. Identity is determined by the key
|
||||
that signed the update request, using either TSIG or SIG(0). In most
|
||||
that signed the update request, using TSIG. In most
|
||||
cases, :any:`update-policy` rules only apply to key-based identities. There
|
||||
is no way to specify update permissions based on the client source address.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -7507,7 +7507,7 @@ the zone's filename, unless :any:`inline-signing` is enabled.
|
|||
field. Details for each rule type are described below.
|
||||
|
||||
The ``identity`` field must be set to a fully qualified domain name. In
|
||||
most cases, this represents the name of the TSIG or SIG(0) key that
|
||||
most cases, this represents the name of the TSIG key that
|
||||
must be used to sign the update request. If the specified name is a
|
||||
wildcard, it is subject to DNS wildcard expansion, and the rule may
|
||||
apply to multiple identities. When a TKEY exchange has been used to
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Limiting access to the server by outside parties can help prevent
|
|||
spoofing and denial of service (DoS) attacks against the server.
|
||||
|
||||
ACLs match clients on the basis of up to three characteristics: 1) The
|
||||
client's IP address; 2) the TSIG or SIG(0) key that was used to sign the
|
||||
client's IP address; 2) the TSIG key that was used to sign the
|
||||
request, if any; and 3) an address prefix encoded in an EDNS
|
||||
Client-Subnet option, if any.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ and no queries at all from the networks specified in ``bogusnets``.
|
|||
|
||||
In addition to network addresses and prefixes, which are matched against
|
||||
the source address of the DNS request, ACLs may include ``key``
|
||||
elements, which specify the name of a TSIG or SIG(0) key.
|
||||
elements, which specify the name of a TSIG key.
|
||||
|
||||
When BIND 9 is built with GeoIP support, ACLs can also be used for
|
||||
geographic access restrictions. This is done by specifying an ACL
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,17 +12,5 @@
|
|||
SIG(0)
|
||||
------
|
||||
|
||||
BIND partially supports DNSSEC SIG(0) transaction signatures as
|
||||
specified in :rfc:`2535` and :rfc:`2931`. SIG(0) uses public/private keys to
|
||||
authenticate messages. Access control is performed in the same manner as with
|
||||
TSIG keys; privileges can be granted or denied in ACL directives based
|
||||
on the key name.
|
||||
|
||||
When a SIG(0) signed message is received, it is only verified if
|
||||
the key is known and trusted by the server. The server does not attempt
|
||||
to recursively fetch or validate the key.
|
||||
|
||||
SIG(0) signing of multiple-message TCP streams is not supported.
|
||||
|
||||
The only tool shipped with BIND 9 that generates SIG(0) signed messages
|
||||
is :iscman:`nsupdate`.
|
||||
Support for DNSSEC SIG(0) transaction signatures has been removed.
|
||||
This is a countermeasure for CVE-2024-1975.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ Security Fixes
|
|||
ISC would like to thank Toshifumi Sakaguchi who independently discovered
|
||||
and responsibly reported the issue to ISC. :gl:`#4548`
|
||||
|
||||
- Validating DNS messages signed using the SIG(0) protocol (:rfc:`2931`) could
|
||||
cause excessive CPU load, leading to a denial-of-service condition.
|
||||
Support for SIG(0) message validation was removed from this version of
|
||||
:iscman:`named`. :cve:`2024-1975` :gl:`#4480`
|
||||
|
||||
- Named could trigger an assertion failure when looking up the NS
|
||||
records of parent zones as part of looking up DS records. This
|
||||
has been fixed. :gl:`#4661`
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3292,111 +3292,24 @@ dns_message_dumpsig(dns_message_t *msg, char *txt1) {
|
|||
|
||||
isc_result_t
|
||||
dns_message_checksig(dns_message_t *msg, dns_view_t *view) {
|
||||
isc_buffer_t b, msgb;
|
||||
isc_buffer_t msgb;
|
||||
|
||||
REQUIRE(DNS_MESSAGE_VALID(msg));
|
||||
|
||||
if (msg->tsigkey == NULL && msg->tsig == NULL && msg->sig0 == NULL) {
|
||||
if (msg->tsigkey == NULL && msg->tsig == NULL) {
|
||||
return (ISC_R_SUCCESS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
INSIST(msg->saved.base != NULL);
|
||||
isc_buffer_init(&msgb, msg->saved.base, msg->saved.length);
|
||||
isc_buffer_add(&msgb, msg->saved.length);
|
||||
if (msg->tsigkey != NULL || msg->tsig != NULL) {
|
||||
#ifdef SKAN_MSG_DEBUG
|
||||
dns_message_dumpsig(msg, "dns_message_checksig#1");
|
||||
dns_message_dumpsig(msg, "dns_message_checksig#1");
|
||||
#endif /* ifdef SKAN_MSG_DEBUG */
|
||||
if (view != NULL) {
|
||||
return (dns_view_checksig(view, &msgb, msg));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return (dns_tsig_verify(&msgb, msg, NULL, NULL));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (view != NULL) {
|
||||
return (dns_view_checksig(view, &msgb, msg));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dns_rdata_t rdata = DNS_RDATA_INIT;
|
||||
dns_rdata_sig_t sig;
|
||||
dns_rdataset_t keyset;
|
||||
isc_result_t result;
|
||||
|
||||
result = dns_rdataset_first(msg->sig0);
|
||||
INSIST(result == ISC_R_SUCCESS);
|
||||
dns_rdataset_current(msg->sig0, &rdata);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This can occur when the message is a dynamic update, since
|
||||
* the rdata length checking is relaxed. This should not
|
||||
* happen in a well-formed message, since the SIG(0) is only
|
||||
* looked for in the additional section, and the dynamic update
|
||||
* meta-records are in the prerequisite and update sections.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rdata.length == 0) {
|
||||
return (ISC_R_UNEXPECTEDEND);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result = dns_rdata_tostruct(&rdata, &sig, NULL);
|
||||
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
return (result);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dns_rdataset_init(&keyset);
|
||||
if (view == NULL) {
|
||||
result = DNS_R_KEYUNAUTHORIZED;
|
||||
goto freesig;
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = dns_view_simplefind(view, &sig.signer,
|
||||
dns_rdatatype_key /* SIG(0) */, 0,
|
||||
0, false, &keyset, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
/* XXXBEW Should possibly create a fetch here */
|
||||
result = DNS_R_KEYUNAUTHORIZED;
|
||||
goto freesig;
|
||||
} else if (keyset.trust < dns_trust_secure) {
|
||||
/* XXXBEW Should call a validator here */
|
||||
result = DNS_R_KEYUNAUTHORIZED;
|
||||
goto freesig;
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = dns_rdataset_first(&keyset);
|
||||
INSIST(result == ISC_R_SUCCESS);
|
||||
for (; result == ISC_R_SUCCESS;
|
||||
result = dns_rdataset_next(&keyset))
|
||||
{
|
||||
dst_key_t *key = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
dns_rdata_reset(&rdata);
|
||||
dns_rdataset_current(&keyset, &rdata);
|
||||
isc_buffer_init(&b, rdata.data, rdata.length);
|
||||
isc_buffer_add(&b, rdata.length);
|
||||
|
||||
result = dst_key_fromdns(&sig.signer, rdata.rdclass, &b,
|
||||
view->mctx, &key);
|
||||
if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (dst_key_alg(key) != sig.algorithm ||
|
||||
dst_key_id(key) != sig.keyid ||
|
||||
!(dst_key_proto(key) == DNS_KEYPROTO_DNSSEC ||
|
||||
dst_key_proto(key) == DNS_KEYPROTO_ANY))
|
||||
{
|
||||
dst_key_free(&key);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = dns_dnssec_verifymessage(&msgb, msg, key);
|
||||
dst_key_free(&key);
|
||||
if (result == ISC_R_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (result == ISC_R_NOMORE) {
|
||||
result = DNS_R_KEYUNAUTHORIZED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
freesig:
|
||||
if (dns_rdataset_isassociated(&keyset)) {
|
||||
dns_rdataset_disassociate(&keyset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
dns_rdata_freestruct(&sig);
|
||||
return (result);
|
||||
return (dns_tsig_verify(&msgb, msg, NULL, NULL));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2167,6 +2167,13 @@ ns__client_request(isc_nmhandle_t *handle, isc_result_t eresult,
|
|||
ns_client_log(client, DNS_LOGCATEGORY_SECURITY,
|
||||
NS_LOGMODULE_CLIENT, ISC_LOG_DEBUG(3),
|
||||
"request is signed by a nonauthoritative key");
|
||||
} else if (result == DNS_R_NOTVERIFIEDYET &&
|
||||
client->message->sig0 != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ns_client_log(client, DNS_LOGCATEGORY_SECURITY,
|
||||
NS_LOGMODULE_CLIENT, ISC_LOG_DEBUG(3),
|
||||
"request has a SIG(0) signature but its support "
|
||||
"was removed (CVE-2024-1975)");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
char tsigrcode[64];
|
||||
isc_buffer_t b;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue