Ma propre conclusion de ce matin était fausse, et une mesure l'a réfutée. J'avais écrit — code, README, commit — que le gel à 12 vCPU venait du SURENGAGEMENT : cette VM avait douze vCPU sur un hôte qui en avait deux. Descente réelle : l'étage 4 à huit vCPU, sur un parent qui en avait NEUF, charge 1,47, aucun surengagement. Gelé pareil. 32 Mio lus en 106 minutes, même RIP à trois relevés espacés de cinq minutes. C'est le nombre de vCPU de l'invité imbriqué, et rien d'autre. Le dimensionnement de bas en haut donnait 8 vCPU à l'étage 4, 7 au 5 : il rendait larges précisément les étages qui doivent rester étroits. Trois largeurs fixes le remplacent — métal, intermédiaire, fond. La mémoire et le disque, eux, restent dimensionnés depuis le bas. VCPU_INTERMEDIAIRE = 3 est une hypothèse assumée : deux démarre au quatrième étage, huit gèle, rien n'est mesuré entre les deux. --- EN --- My own conclusion from this morning was wrong, and a measurement refuted it. I had written — code, README, commit — that the 12-vCPU freeze came from OVERCOMMIT: that VM had twelve vCPU on a host with two. Real descent: level 4 at eight vCPU, on a parent with NINE, load 1.47, no overcommit whatsoever. Frozen all the same. 32 MiB read in 106 minutes, same RIP at three readings five minutes apart. It is the nested guest's vCPU count, nothing else. Bottom-up sizing gave level 4 eight vCPU and level 5 seven: it made wide exactly the levels that must stay narrow. Three fixed widths replace it — metal, intermediate, floor. Memory and disk stay sized from the bottom. VCPU_INTERMEDIAIRE = 3 is an owned hypothesis: two boots at the fourth level, eight freezes, nothing is measured in between. Assisted-by: claude-opus-5 (cherry picked from commit ee45ff4f333c69e3862e277334cb34efa39bbd57) |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| install_proxmox.sh | ||
| nesting.py | ||
| proxmox_deploy.py | ||
| README.base.md | ||
| README.fr.md | ||
| README.md | ||
Deploying VMs on a Proxmox VE host
Two different things live in this directory:
install_proxmox.shturns a Debian into a Proxmox hypervisor. Seescript/qemu/README.md, which documents theproxmoxdistro of the deployment catalog.proxmox_deploy.pydeploys VMs on such a host, fromTODO › Execute › Deploy › Proxmox VE, right underQEMU/KVM.
The whole difference: the hypervisor is elsewhere
With QEMU/KVM, the hypervisor is the machine running the script. With Proxmox it is somewhere else, so the first question is which host — and the answer is remembered for the session. Three ways, all offered by the menu:
- From the local QEMU VMs — a
proxmoxVM deployed here. Its address comes from the DHCP lease, nothing to retype. - By address —
user@host, plus an optional SSH jump. - From
~/.ssh/config— the alias already carries user, port and ProxyJump; nothing else is asked.
The chosen host is then checked, not assumed: pveversion proves it is a
Proxmox, id -u and sudo -n true decide whether commands need sudo, and an
unknown SSH host key is offered for recording (with ssh-keyscan, never by
disabling the check — a hypervisor is not a throwaway VM).
# Ce que l'outil envoie, et qu'on peut rejouer à la main :
ssh erplibre@pve1 sudo sh -c 'qm list'
ssh erplibre@pve1 sudo sh -c 'pvesm status --content images'
Why SSH and qm, not the REST API
The API needs a token or a ticket to create and renew. qm is the path every
Proxmox administrator knows, the repository already manages SSH access
(~/.ssh/config, ProxyJump, keys), and the commands stay readable in the log —
so they can be replayed by hand. That is how every failure of this module was
diagnosed.
sudo sh -c '<whole command>' and not sudo <command>: these commands are
sequences and redirections. Prefixing with sudo would elevate only the first
word, and the redirection would still be the unprivileged shell's.
Four traps met on a real host
A Proxmox installed on Debian has no vmbr0 — the ISO installer creates
one, that procedure does not. And qm create requires a bridge.
The menu offers an internal bridge (vmbr0, 10.10.10.1/24, NAT through
the uplink). Never adding the physical NIC to a bridge is deliberate: that
moves the host address and cuts the SSH session in progress — remotely, there
is no way back. A LAN-facing bridge is printed as a stanza to apply from a
console.
On an internal bridge no DHCP answers, so the address is static, derived from the VMID — and therefore known before the VM boots. Looking for it afterwards was absurd.
The Debian cloud image does not ship qemu-guest-agent, so Proxmox cannot tell
the address of a DHCP guest: it does not hand out the leases. The fallback is
the host's own neighbour table (ip neigh), which needs nothing from the guest.
The menu, entry by entry
The seventeen QEMU/KVM entries have their counterpart. Four of them are the
same code, because it is the same work: reopening the install monitoring,
the remote desktop tunnel, the Android emulator and the image catalog. They
reach Proxmox guests through the ~/.ssh/config entries that entry 13 writes,
with the Proxmox host as ProxyJump.
[1] Déployer une VM [8] Redimensionner un disque [15] Émulateur Android *
[2] Prévisualiser [9] Effacer des VM [16] Catalogue d'images *
[3] Télécharger une image [10] Nettoyer (orphelins) [17] Exemple (dry-run)
[4] Rouvrir le suivi * [11] Tester une VM (Odoo) [18] Changer d'hôte
[5] Lister (qm list) [12] Statistiques
[6] Adresse IP d'une VM [13] Configuration SSH
[7] Console d'une VM [14] Tunnel bureau distant *
* code partagé avec le menu QEMU/KVM
Verified
Deploying a VM inside a Proxmox that itself runs in a libvirt VM: image
downloaded on the host, internal bridge created, static address, cloud-init
user and key, disk resized, qm start. Then ssh vm-essai from the outside
reaches it through the jump — three nested levels. Resize 12G → 16G, delete
with --purge, orphan scan: all checked against Proxmox VE 9.2.11.