Le formulaire demandait « tout le trafic ? » à un pilote dont le SERVEUR décide du routage, ne faisait rien de la réponse, et `status` la jugeait quand même : un ✗ permanent sur un tunnel sain, et un profil annonçant « tout le trafic » sans l'obtenir. Un drapeau, sur le modèle de celui du MTU, dit quels pilotes posent cette route. Les autres ne sont ni interrogés ni jugés, et un drapeau laissé à vrai n'est plus conservé. L'honorer serait pire qu'inutile : forcer une route par défaut contre une passerelle en tunnel scindé donne un trou noir, une passerelle ne routant pas ce qu'elle n'a pas annoncé. Les routes déclarées, elles, restent honorées — le formulaire le dit. --- EN --- The form asked "all traffic?" of a driver whose SERVER decides the routing, did nothing with the answer, and `status` judged it anyway: a permanent ✗ on a healthy tunnel, and a profile announcing "all traffic" without getting it. A flag, modelled on the MTU one, says which drivers lay that route. The others are neither asked nor judged, and a flag left true is no longer kept. Honouring it would be worse than useless: forcing a default route against a split-tunnel gateway gives a black hole, a gateway not routing what it never advertised. Declared routes are still honoured — the form says so. Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto_ask.py | ||
| database_manager.py | ||
| deploy_form_extras.py | ||
| deploy_form_lib.py | ||
| deploy_form_plan.py | ||
| dev_tools.py | ||
| kdbx_manager.py | ||
| logo_ascii.txt | ||
| longtest_menu.py | ||
| migration_form.py | ||
| migration_stats.py | ||
| migration_status.py | ||
| migration_status_tui.py | ||
| proxmox_deploy_form.py | ||
| proxmox_menu.py | ||
| qemu_access.py | ||
| qemu_deploy.py | ||
| qemu_deploy_form.py | ||
| qemu_hardware.py | ||
| qemu_install.py | ||
| qemu_install_monitor.py | ||
| qemu_manage.py | ||
| qemu_menu.py | ||
| qemu_network.py | ||
| qemu_privilege.py | ||
| qemu_recover.py | ||
| README.base.md | ||
| README.fr.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| source_todo.sh | ||
| textual_setup.py | ||
| todo.json | ||
| todo.py | ||
| todo_example.json | ||
| todo_file_browser.py | ||
| todo_i18n.py | ||
| todo_install.py | ||
| todo_prefs.py | ||
| todo_telemetry.py | ||
| todo_upgrade.py | ||
| version_manager.py | ||
| vpn_menu.py | ||
TODO is an assistant robot to use ERPLibre
Execute it with ./script/todo/todo.py or make todo.
For a new project, copy todo_example.json to private/todo/todo_override.json | private/todo/todo_override_private.json and edit it.
The mail/ package is the mail client reachable from Assistant > Mail:
several IMAP/SMTP accounts, a local cache, and a Textual TUI. See
../../doc/EMAIL.md.
Where the code lives
todo.py carries the menus and the general helpers. Everything around a
single subject sits in its own file, and the whole thing is assembled by
mixins on the TODO class — one file, one subject, its header states its
boundary.
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
todo.py |
the menus, the configuration, the general helpers |
qemu_menu.py |
the QEMU/KVM menu, the image catalogue, the statistics |
qemu_deploy.py |
deciding then running a deployment |
qemu_install.py |
the recipes run inside a VM |
qemu_manage.py |
lifecycle, disks, hardware, cleanup, addresses |
qemu_access.py |
SSH, tunnels, consoles, Android emulator |
proxmox_menu.py |
the same, on a REMOTE Proxmox VE host |
The two deployment forms — libvirt here, Proxmox over there — ask the same questions, so they share a foundation rather than each holding a copy:
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
deploy_form_lib.py |
pure logic (sizes, plan, totals, spec), the shared CSS, the resource-row factory, the progress view |
deploy_form_plan.py |
the plan's gestures: overrides, locks, copies, renaming, free values |
qemu_deploy_form.py |
what QEMU/KVM adds: desktops, tools, branches, install profiles |
proxmox_deploy_form.py |
what Proxmox adds: host, storage, bridge, VMID, address |
A form inherits PlanMixin and provides three hooks: which presets each
resource offers, the name a VM would fall back to, and what a lock freezes.
test_todo_deploy_form_lib.py fails if a form redefines a gesture the
foundation already carries — that is what keeps the architecture from drifting
back into two copies.