`vpn.py` savait tout faire en ligne de commande, mais il fallait écrire le profil JSON à la main et déposer les secrets dans KeePassXC soi-même. Le menu pose les questions que le pilote choisi déclare, et lui seul : ajouter une technologie n'ajoute pas une ligne ici. Le coffre est manipulé EN PROCESSUS — le mot de passe maître est déjà en mémoire, le redemander à un sous-processus serait une saisie de plus à chaque geste. Montage, démontage et diagnostic passent au contraire par `vpn.py` en sous-processus : ils durent, ils parlent, et la sortie en direct est ce qui rend une montée de tunnel suivable. Vérifié : 37 tests sur le menu, aucune saisie réelle. --- EN --- `vpn.py` could already do everything from the command line, but the JSON profile had to be written by hand and the secrets filed into KeePassXC by hand. The menu asks the questions the chosen driver declares, and only those: adding a technology adds no line here. The vault is handled IN PROCESS — the master password is already in memory, and asking a subprocess for it again would be one more entry at every step. Raising, tearing down and diagnosing go through `vpn.py` as a subprocess instead: they last, they talk, and live output is what makes a tunnel coming up followable. Checked: 37 tests on the menu, no real input. Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto_ask.py | ||
| database_manager.py | ||
| deploy_form_extras.py | ||
| deploy_form_lib.py | ||
| deploy_form_plan.py | ||
| dev_tools.py | ||
| kdbx_manager.py | ||
| logo_ascii.txt | ||
| longtest_menu.py | ||
| migration_form.py | ||
| migration_stats.py | ||
| migration_status.py | ||
| migration_status_tui.py | ||
| proxmox_deploy_form.py | ||
| proxmox_menu.py | ||
| qemu_access.py | ||
| qemu_deploy.py | ||
| qemu_deploy_form.py | ||
| qemu_hardware.py | ||
| qemu_install.py | ||
| qemu_install_monitor.py | ||
| qemu_manage.py | ||
| qemu_menu.py | ||
| qemu_privilege.py | ||
| qemu_recover.py | ||
| README.base.md | ||
| README.fr.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| source_todo.sh | ||
| textual_setup.py | ||
| todo.json | ||
| todo.py | ||
| todo_example.json | ||
| todo_file_browser.py | ||
| todo_i18n.py | ||
| todo_install.py | ||
| todo_prefs.py | ||
| todo_telemetry.py | ||
| todo_upgrade.py | ||
| version_manager.py | ||
| vpn_menu.py | ||
TODO is an assistant robot to use ERPLibre
Execute it with ./script/todo/todo.py or make todo.
For a new project, copy todo_example.json to private/todo/todo_override.json | private/todo/todo_override_private.json and edit it.
The mail/ package is the mail client reachable from Assistant > Mail:
several IMAP/SMTP accounts, a local cache, and a Textual TUI. See
../../doc/EMAIL.md.
Where the code lives
todo.py carries the menus and the general helpers. Everything around a
single subject sits in its own file, and the whole thing is assembled by
mixins on the TODO class — one file, one subject, its header states its
boundary.
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
todo.py |
the menus, the configuration, the general helpers |
qemu_menu.py |
the QEMU/KVM menu, the image catalogue, the statistics |
qemu_deploy.py |
deciding then running a deployment |
qemu_install.py |
the recipes run inside a VM |
qemu_manage.py |
lifecycle, disks, hardware, cleanup, addresses |
qemu_access.py |
SSH, tunnels, consoles, Android emulator |
proxmox_menu.py |
the same, on a REMOTE Proxmox VE host |
The two deployment forms — libvirt here, Proxmox over there — ask the same questions, so they share a foundation rather than each holding a copy:
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
deploy_form_lib.py |
pure logic (sizes, plan, totals, spec), the shared CSS, the resource-row factory, the progress view |
deploy_form_plan.py |
the plan's gestures: overrides, locks, copies, renaming, free values |
qemu_deploy_form.py |
what QEMU/KVM adds: desktops, tools, branches, install profiles |
proxmox_deploy_form.py |
what Proxmox adds: host, storage, bridge, VMID, address |
A form inherits PlanMixin and provides three hooks: which presets each
resource offers, the name a VM would fall back to, and what a lock freezes.
test_todo_deploy_form_lib.py fails if a form redefines a gesture the
foundation already carries — that is what keeps the architecture from drifting
back into two copies.