Des mots pris dans une liste, des nombres tirés entre 0 et 1000, écrits en SQL. Aucun modèle, aucun réseau — un test le vérifie sur les imports. Le difficile n'est pas de remplacer, c'est de savoir ce qu'on n'a PAS le droit de toucher. Mesuré sur une base 18 réelle : 505 champs `selection` sont stockés en varchar, 2693 many2one sont des entiers, 194 textes sont des jsonb par langue, 301 contraintes d'unicité attendent une collision. « Tous les champs string » n'existe pas ; on croise ir_model_fields, pg_attribute et pg_constraint, et aucune des trois ne suffit seule. Trois pièges ont été trouvés en LANÇANT l'outil, pas en le relisant : PostgreSQL refuse d'indexer un ARRAY[...] sans parenthèses, res_partner.credit_limit est un jsonb qu'Odoo appelle float, et crm_lead.probability porte un CHECK qui interdit 1000. Chaque fois l'écriture a échoué et la base est restée intacte : une seule transaction, tout ou rien. Preuve sur copie jetable : empreinte du schéma identique, 848 tables, 6495 contraintes, arch_db et xmlid intacts, lang et many2one inchangés — seules les colonnes visées ont changé. --- EN --- Words from a list, numbers drawn between 0 and 1000, written in SQL. No model, no network — a test checks that on the imports. The hard part is not replacing, it is knowing what must NOT be touched. Measured on a real 18 database: 505 `selection` fields are stored as varchar, 2693 many2one are integers, 194 texts are per-language jsonb, 301 unique constraints await a collision. "All string fields" does not exist; we cross ir_model_fields, pg_attribute and pg_constraint, and none of the three is enough alone. Three traps were found by RUNNING it, not by rereading it: PostgreSQL refuses to subscript a bare ARRAY[...], res_partner.credit_limit is a jsonb Odoo calls float, and crm_lead.probability has a CHECK forbidding 1000. Each time the write failed and the database stayed intact: one transaction, all or nothing. Proof on a throwaway copy: identical schema fingerprint, 848 tables, 6495 constraints, arch_db and xmlids intact, lang and many2one unchanged — only the targeted columns changed. Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto_ask.py | ||
| database_manager.py | ||
| deploy_form_extras.py | ||
| deploy_form_lib.py | ||
| deploy_form_plan.py | ||
| kdbx_manager.py | ||
| logo_ascii.txt | ||
| migration_form.py | ||
| migration_stats.py | ||
| migration_status.py | ||
| migration_status_tui.py | ||
| proxmox_deploy_form.py | ||
| proxmox_menu.py | ||
| qemu_access.py | ||
| qemu_deploy.py | ||
| qemu_deploy_form.py | ||
| qemu_hardware.py | ||
| qemu_install.py | ||
| qemu_install_monitor.py | ||
| qemu_manage.py | ||
| qemu_menu.py | ||
| README.base.md | ||
| README.fr.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| source_todo.sh | ||
| textual_setup.py | ||
| todo.json | ||
| todo.py | ||
| todo_example.json | ||
| todo_file_browser.py | ||
| todo_i18n.py | ||
| todo_prefs.py | ||
| todo_telemetry.py | ||
| todo_upgrade.py | ||
| version_manager.py | ||
TODO is an assistant robot to use ERPLibre
Execute it with ./script/todo/todo.py or make todo.
For a new project, copy todo_example.json to private/todo/todo_override.json | private/todo/todo_override_private.json and edit it.
The mail/ package is the mail client reachable from Assistant > Mail:
several IMAP/SMTP accounts, a local cache, and a Textual TUI. See
../../doc/EMAIL.md.
Where the code lives
todo.py carries the menus and the general helpers. Everything around a
single subject sits in its own file, and the whole thing is assembled by
mixins on the TODO class — one file, one subject, its header states its
boundary.
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
todo.py |
the menus, the configuration, the general helpers |
qemu_menu.py |
the QEMU/KVM menu, the image catalogue, the statistics |
qemu_deploy.py |
deciding then running a deployment |
qemu_install.py |
the recipes run inside a VM |
qemu_manage.py |
lifecycle, disks, hardware, cleanup, addresses |
qemu_access.py |
SSH, tunnels, consoles, Android emulator |
proxmox_menu.py |
the same, on a REMOTE Proxmox VE host |
The two deployment forms — libvirt here, Proxmox over there — ask the same questions, so they share a foundation rather than each holding a copy:
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
deploy_form_lib.py |
pure logic (sizes, plan, totals, spec), the shared CSS, the resource-row factory, the progress view |
deploy_form_plan.py |
the plan's gestures: overrides, locks, copies, renaming, free values |
qemu_deploy_form.py |
what QEMU/KVM adds: desktops, tools, branches, install profiles |
proxmox_deploy_form.py |
what Proxmox adds: host, storage, bridge, VMID, address |
A form inherits PlanMixin and provides three hooks: which presets each
resource offers, the name a VM would fall back to, and what a lock freezes.
test_todo_deploy_form_lib.py fails if a form redefines a gesture the
foundation already carries — that is what keeps the architecture from drifting
back into two copies.