Sur Proxmox on déploie le plus souvent un parc MIXTE — un hyperviseur imbriqué à côté de VM ERPLibre. C'est exactement le cas où un réglage par machine sert, et c'est le seul écran qui ne l'offrait pas : ses rangées n'avaient ni branche, ni profil, ni type. Les trois choix et leur gestionnaire — quatre-vingts lignes — rejoignent le socle. Les dupliquer aurait remis en place le mécanisme de dérive qu'on vient d'enlever. L'écran QEMU/KVM perd encore 130 lignes sans qu'un widget, un modèle ou une spec ne bouge : ancien et nouveau montés dans le même processus, mêmes rangées, mêmes valeurs après avoir changé une branche, un type et un profil. Le déploiement suit : il lisait la seule valeur commune alors que le plan portait déjà le choix par rangée. Une seule VM qui s'écarte suffit à rendre la carte nécessaire — « len(set) > 1 » ne l'aurait pas vu. Un défaut trouvé par un test, pas à l'usage : l'écho du montage se reconnaissait à sa commande, or quand la commande imposée par le système n'est pas dans la liste proposée, la liste retombe au rang 0 — et l'écho de ce rang 0 effaçait l'imposition. Un Proxmox imbriqué reprenait ERPLibre et Odoo 18. L'écho se reconnaît maintenant au RANG affiché. --- EN --- On Proxmox you usually deploy a MIXED fleet — a nested hypervisor next to ERPLibre VMs. That is exactly where a per-machine setting earns its keep, and it was the only screen without one: its rows had no branch, no profile, no type. The three choices and their handler — eighty lines — move into the shared foundation. Duplicating them would have restored the very drift mechanism we just removed. The QEMU/KVM screen loses another 130 lines with no widget, model or spec moving: old and new mounted in one process, same rows, same values after changing a branch, a type and a profile. The deployment follows: it read the single common value while the plan already carried the per-row choice. One VM that differs is enough to require the map — "len(set) > 1" would not have seen it. One defect found by a test, not by use: the mount echo was recognised by its command, yet when the command imposed by the guest OS is absent from the offered list, the list falls back to index 0 — and that index-0 echo erased the imposition. A nested Proxmox took ERPLibre and Odoo 18 back. The echo is now recognised by the DISPLAYED index. Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| auto_ask.py | ||
| database_manager.py | ||
| deploy_form_extras.py | ||
| deploy_form_lib.py | ||
| deploy_form_plan.py | ||
| kdbx_manager.py | ||
| logo_ascii.txt | ||
| migration_form.py | ||
| migration_stats.py | ||
| migration_status.py | ||
| migration_status_tui.py | ||
| proxmox_deploy_form.py | ||
| proxmox_menu.py | ||
| qemu_access.py | ||
| qemu_deploy.py | ||
| qemu_deploy_form.py | ||
| qemu_hardware.py | ||
| qemu_install.py | ||
| qemu_install_monitor.py | ||
| qemu_manage.py | ||
| qemu_menu.py | ||
| README.base.md | ||
| README.fr.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| source_todo.sh | ||
| textual_setup.py | ||
| todo.json | ||
| todo.py | ||
| todo_example.json | ||
| todo_file_browser.py | ||
| todo_i18n.py | ||
| todo_prefs.py | ||
| todo_telemetry.py | ||
| todo_upgrade.py | ||
| version_manager.py | ||
TODO is an assistant robot to use ERPLibre
Execute it with ./script/todo/todo.py or make todo.
For a new project, copy todo_example.json to private/todo/todo_override.json | private/todo/todo_override_private.json and edit it.
The mail/ package is the mail client reachable from Assistant > Mail:
several IMAP/SMTP accounts, a local cache, and a Textual TUI. See
../../doc/EMAIL.md.
Where the code lives
todo.py carries the menus and the general helpers. Everything around a
single subject sits in its own file, and the whole thing is assembled by
mixins on the TODO class — one file, one subject, its header states its
boundary.
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
todo.py |
the menus, the configuration, the general helpers |
qemu_menu.py |
the QEMU/KVM menu, the image catalogue, the statistics |
qemu_deploy.py |
deciding then running a deployment |
qemu_install.py |
the recipes run inside a VM |
qemu_manage.py |
lifecycle, disks, hardware, cleanup, addresses |
qemu_access.py |
SSH, tunnels, consoles, Android emulator |
proxmox_menu.py |
the same, on a REMOTE Proxmox VE host |
The two deployment forms — libvirt here, Proxmox over there — ask the same questions, so they share a foundation rather than each holding a copy:
| File | What it owns |
|---|---|
deploy_form_lib.py |
pure logic (sizes, plan, totals, spec), the shared CSS, the resource-row factory, the progress view |
deploy_form_plan.py |
the plan's gestures: overrides, locks, copies, renaming, free values |
qemu_deploy_form.py |
what QEMU/KVM adds: desktops, tools, branches, install profiles |
proxmox_deploy_form.py |
what Proxmox adds: host, storage, bridge, VMID, address |
A form inherits PlanMixin and provides three hooks: which presets each
resource offers, the name a VM would fall back to, and what a lock freezes.
test_todo_deploy_form_lib.py fails if a form redefines a gesture the
foundation already carries — that is what keeps the architecture from drifting
back into two copies.