# LongTest — tests that create real machines These are not unit tests. They create virtual machines, install systems on them, and take hours. They live here and **not** in `test/`, which the unit runner sweeps: `./script/test/run_unit_test.sh` must stay runnable in seconds on any machine, including one without virtualisation. Run them from the menu — `TODO › Execute › Test › Long tests` — or directly. ## deep_proxmox.py — how deep does Proxmox-in-Proxmox go? The practicable nesting depth cannot be deduced, only measured. A manual measurement found, at the fourth level, a guest **36 times slower than real time** — 583 seconds of wall clock for 16 seconds of guest time, each ACPI line taking a second — then a guest kernel frozen at the **same byte** whatever the resources. A number obtained once, on one machine, is not a number: this script redoes it on demand and says exactly where it breaks. ``` ./LongTest/deep_proxmox.py --depth 10 --dry-run # the plan, nothing created ./LongTest/deep_proxmox.py --depth 10 # hours ./LongTest/deep_proxmox.py --detruire # undo it ``` The descent is **uniform**. Every level, the first included, goes through the same six steps: create, wait for ssh, install Proxmox, reboot and check the kernel, bring pmxcfs back up, check the storage. Only creation differs — libvirt locally, `qm` afterwards. It sends **our** `install_proxmox.sh` over scp instead of letting the VM clone the repository: it is our code we want to exercise, and the remote is often behind the checkout — a fix absent from the remote made the same defect "come back" on three VMs in a row. ### The resource algorithm Two things run out going down, and a third degrades. What runs out is arithmetic, and `script/proxmox/nesting.py` computes it: * **memory** — each level keeps what its own daemons need (`pve-cluster`, `pvestatd`, `pvedaemon`, `pveproxy`) before handing the rest down; * **disk** — the child's disk lives *inside* the parent's, which must also hold its own system. What degrades is measured, not assumed: past the second level, vendors document nothing. Hence one capped number — **2 vCPU** for every nested level. Twelve vCPU at the fourth level froze the guest kernel in early boot; the same two progressed. Bringing twelve processors online costs as many round trips through the whole stack. Memory is **not** capped: the same VM froze at the same byte with 9 GB and with 2 GB, so trimming it would gain nothing and starve the level below. The plan is printed **before** anything is created, and the script never promises a depth it knows will not fit — better to announce six levels and reach six than to promise ten and die at the seventh without knowing why.