# LongTest — tests that create real machines These are not unit tests. They create virtual machines, install systems on them, and take hours. They live here and **not** in `test/`, which the unit runner sweeps: `./script/test/run_unit_test.sh` must stay runnable in seconds on any machine, including one without virtualisation. Run them from the menu — `TODO › Execute › Test › Long tests` — or directly. ## deep_proxmox.py — how deep does Proxmox-in-Proxmox go? The practicable nesting depth cannot be deduced, only measured — and one measurement is not a measurement. A manual look at one fourth-level VM found a guest **36 times slower than real time** (583 seconds of wall clock for 16 seconds of guest time, each ACPI line taking a second) and then a frozen kernel: identical RIP across three samples two minutes apart, and **not one byte written** to disk. Running this script **refuted the conclusion drawn from it**. Its own fourth-level VM — 2 vCPU where the manual one had 12 — booted, installed, and wrote gigabytes. What looked like a nesting ceiling was a *parallelism* ceiling under nesting. That is exactly what the algorithm caps, and this is how it stopped being a guess. Which is the point of the script: a number obtained once, on one machine, in one chain, is an anecdote. ``` ./LongTest/deep_proxmox.py --depth 10 --dry-run # the plan, nothing created ./LongTest/deep_proxmox.py --depth 10 # hours ./LongTest/deep_proxmox.py --detruire # undo it ``` The descent is **uniform**. Every level, the first included, goes through the same six steps: create, wait for ssh, install Proxmox, reboot and check the kernel, bring pmxcfs back up, check the storage. Only creation differs — libvirt locally, `qm` afterwards. It sends **our** `install_proxmox.sh` over scp instead of letting the VM clone the repository: it is our code we want to exercise, and the remote is often behind the checkout — a fix absent from the remote made the same defect "come back" on three VMs in a row. ### The resource algorithm — sized from the bottom up The first version handed down whatever the parent could spare, and a real descent showed what that costs. Level 4 ended up with 44 GB of memory and 2 vCPU **on a host that had 2** — a hundred percent overcommit, at every level, with the hypervisor itself to serve on top. Its install ran past two and a half hours against thirteen minutes for level 3, and extrapolating that ratio gave five years for the tenth. So the direction is reversed. The deepest level gets what a test Proxmox actually asks for — 4 GB of memory, 25 GB of disk, 2 vCPU — and every parent above it adds its own overhead and nothing else: one vCPU, 2 GiB, 10 GB. A ten-level descent therefore asks its first level for 11 vCPU, 22 GB and 115 GB, where handing resources down wanted 50 GB of memory for the same depth. Three budgets can bound the depth, and `script/proxmox/nesting.py` names the one that ran out: * **memory** — every level must run its own daemons (`pve-cluster`, `pvestatd`, `pvedaemon`, `pveproxy`) *and* hold its child; * **disk** — the child's disk lives *inside* the parent's, which must also hold its own system; * **processor** — each level wants one vCPU more than its child, so ten levels ask eleven of the first. Half the physical cores is the ceiling: the orchestrator runs on that machine too. That third budget is measured, not assumed. Twelve vCPU at the fourth level froze the guest kernel in early boot — same instruction pointer at three readings two minutes apart — while two progressed. The number was not the culprit: that VM had twelve vCPU on a host with two, six times wider than its own machine. Overcommit freezes, not the twelve. Memory is not the lever. On that same manual VM, dropping it from 9 GB to 2 GB moved nothing — it stopped after reading the same 32 MiB, which is simply the size of the boot files. The plan is printed **before** anything is created, and the script never promises a depth it knows will not fit — better to announce six levels and reach six than to promise ten and die at the seventh without knowing why.