The migration now opens with the same choice the QEMU deployment does — TUI
or line-by-line prompts — settled in advance by TODO > Configuration if you
want it to be. Choosing the TUI loads the saved progression and asks the very
same first question: where does this migration stand, and where do we resume?
prompt_resume was one function that rendered, read and decided at once, so a
second view would have meant a second copy of the decision. It is now three:
resume_context() the progression -> plain data (file, database, target,
steps with their icon and detail, version bumps)
print_resume() renders it on the terminal
apply_resume_answer() answer -> (progression, changed)
The TUI returns the SAME answer strings as the prompt — c, n, r, q, 0..4,
4.<version> — so apply_resume_answer stays the only place that decides what a
choice means. Neither view can drift into describing the migration
differently, because both render the same context.
In the TUI the steps are a table and the version bumps a list: Enter on either
replays from there, which is what « [0-4] » and « [4.N] » meant in text. The
cursor opens on the first unfinished step and on the first unmigrated version
— where it stopped is where one usually wants to act.
Both views gain « q », quit without doing anything. A TUI needs Escape to do
something sane, and an escape hatch present in only one of the two views is
exactly the kind of divergence this split exists to prevent. execute_odoo_
upgrade returns immediately on it, writing nothing.
Verified on a 12->18 progression with steps 0-3 done and 2 of 6 bumps
migrated: identical context feeding both views, Enter on step 2 giving « 2 »,
Enter on the 15 bump giving « 4.15 », the c/n/r/q/Escape shortcuts, and every
answer producing the same progression through both paths — « 2 » leaving only
the state of steps 0 and 1, « 4.15 » resetting the clone list from the third
bump on so the half-migrated intermediate database gets rebuilt. « q » checked
to leave the progression file byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nothing in the CLI could be remembered from one session to the next except the
language, which lives in env_var.sh with its own ad-hoc parser. Entry [6]
Configuration, below Telemetry, now groups the settings that belong to the
USER rather than to the repository.
todo_prefs.py stores them in ~/.erplibre/todo_prefs.json — the same place and
the same best-effort shape as todo_telemetry.py, since both are per-user and
per-machine, and neither must ever prevent the CLI from starting. A DEFAULTS
table gives every known key its fallback, so a missing or corrupt file simply
reads as defaults.
The two keys added here prepare the QEMU deploy form: which interface to use
(ask / TUI / classic) and what to display while deploying (CLI output or TUI).
They are declared once in _PREF_CHOICES — the screen, the current-value label
and the editor all derive from that single table, so adding a preference is
one entry, not three edits.
Language keeps its own mechanism: it is read before the preferences file
exists and is consumed by shell scripts too.
Verified against a temporary HOME: defaults returned with no file on disk, a
change persisted and reflected in the menu, and reset falling back to
defaults.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
